- Joined
- Dec 6, 2020
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My schizo theory is that most of these YouTube alternatives are run by alt right people. Since Ralph is a huge white trash wigger he is of course a hero to the alt right. So basically they are willing to back him as long as hes useful to them.So Odysee status: Gunted?
How does he keep getting away with it!?!?!?!?
Odysee is all jews and pajeetsMy schizo theory is that most of these YouTube alternatives are run by alt right people. Since Ralph is a huge white trash wigger he is of course a hero to the alt right. So basically they are willing to back him as long as hes useful to them.
And these Jews and Indians go out of their way to fund and give voice to a 300lb liability who killed previous platforms that he called home? That's odd to me.Odysee is all jews and pajeets
Very odd. Stream.me was run by people in the porn industry, dlive is all chinks and turks, trovo is chinks and former dlive employees and now we've got jews and street shitters. No clue why these people feel the need to cater to Gunty.And these Jews and Indians go out of their way to fund and give voice to a 300lb liability who killed previous platforms that he called home? That's odd to me.
Despite what he allows his guests to say, these are all ethnic groups that Ethan Ralph would happily slip 3.5 desperate inches to one of their women, born with vagina or not, who scored up to a standard 6.5 on the rating scaleVery odd. Stream.me was run by people in the porn industry, dlive is all chinks and turks, trovo is chinks and former dlive employees and now we've got jews and street shitters. No clue why these people feel the need to cater to Gunty.
What's your source on the identity of the website owners?Very odd. Stream.me was run by people in the porn industry, dlive is all chinks and turks, trovo is chinks and former dlive employees and now we've got jews and street shitters. No clue why these people feel the need to cater to Gunty.
In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary. It is playing Ralph's content wholesale with no commentary present. As such this is probably a good call from a legal standpoint, and I think the law would back Odysee up in this case. That being said, if Odysee decided, on it's own, that they would remove it without conforming to what is required under the DMCA, then they likely would be giving up Section 230 protections because they made an editorial decision. If Pho has no recourse--or his recourse has to include them--then Odysee could theoretically be named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Pho.View attachment 2227761
Ralph owns the copyright of Pho talking shit and criticizing him.
Then I hope Odysee puts Pho’s videos on Ralph’s channel. Ralph obviously wouldn’t want that....
The lbry websiteWhat's your source on the identity of the website owners?
Pho comments during the entire stream provides criticism. HeIn fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary. It is playing Ralph's content wholesale with no commentary present. As such this is probably a good call from a legal standpoint, and I think the law would back Odysee up in this case. That being said, if Odysee decided, on it's own, that they would remove it without conforming to what is required under the DMCA, then they likely would be giving up Section 230 protections because they made an editorial decision. If Pho has no recourse--or his recourse has to include them--then Odysee could theoretically be named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Pho.
They run by skin of the teeth profit margins. They do not have the money for proper staff or bots to deal with this properly or consistently or who cannot be steamrolled by a "Memphis mauler" waaaaaaaghing uncontrollably in the support vcSo they completely crumble to a bullshit DMCA from a literal who? How do you not have policies to deal with this, why are these alt platforms so embarrassingly shit?
except for the all the commentary he has where he vocalizes opinions on whats happening over ralph to the point if for some reason you cared about what he said youd miss entire chunks of his wheezing on tucker clips if pho isnt fair use ethan ralph should be sued by tucker a thousand fold since he doesnt edit anything over it and im not sure a "what! are you serious?" for two seconds out of sometimes literally over half an hour of uncut stolen content passes the test.In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary
Pho's snipes are transformative to the point that they're nearly unusable for other ayyyylawgs who want to do commentary on whatever retardation Ralph broadcast that eveningexcept for the all the commentary he has where he vocalizes opinions on whats happening over ralph to the point if for some reason you cared about what he said youd miss entire chunks of his wheezing on tucker clips if pho isnt fair use ethan ralph should be sued by tucker a thousand fold since he doesnt edit anything over it and im not sure a "what! are you serious?" for two seconds out of sometimes literally over half an hour of uncut stolen content passes the test.
I may be thinking of Sam, then. I know I watched a few streamsnipes probably four or five months ago, and there was no actual commentary, just a bunch of gifs and pictures. I don't know.Pho comments during the entire stream provides criticism. Hehas actual commentary... His streams start before the Gunts, he plays music, talks to chat. It starts he criticizes the gunt.
YOU'RE CARRYING DAT GUNT.I think it's really funny PhoBingas got taken down and people are mad about it. Anyone who actually thought what Pho did was transformative is just lying, i don't even think they are under the delusion that it was transformative. The whole thing was basically just in Ralph's face "Haha I'm restreaming your content for kiwifarmers to laugh at". I mean I used his restreams sometimes too, but let's be honest at least
it depends, its just as transformative, actually far more so than nearly any instance of ralph's copyright theft. legally maybe dunno how lax it is, morally if ralph wasnt a massive hypocrite then people just wouldnt be doing it anyway. if ralph has a right on odysee to play tucker clips in full with little to nothing in the way of commentary or editing, just watching tucker uploads then something that alters the visuals and audio heavily like pho's streams should be allowed or he and ralph should be banned together.I think it's really funny PhoBingas got taken down and people are mad about it. Anyone who actually thought what Pho did was transformative is just lying, i don't even think they are under the delusion that it was transformative. The whole thing was basically just in Ralph's face "Haha I'm restreaming your content for kiwifarmers to laugh at". I mean I used his restreams sometimes too, but let's be honest at least
that was a lot of older snipes. nowadays pho has plenty of transformative commentaryI may be thinking of Sam, then. I know I watched a few streamsnipes probably four or five months ago, and there was no actual commentary, just a bunch of gifs and pictures. I don't know.
Did you even watch my streams? I gave commentary over them, had a soundboard and on a couple of occasions had guests and callers.In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary.