🐷 The Killstream General Discussion Thread - Discuss Ethan Ralph's stagnant Killstream and his appearances on other shows.

Will Faith and/or Amanda get another DVRO after this pillstream?

  • YES. Suffa piggy.

    Votes: 278 71.8%
  • NO! Another Ralphamale W.

    Votes: 109 28.2%

  • Total voters
    387
ralph_pedo.jpg
Imagine bowing down to this guy. Fuck you Odysee.

EDIT: did some color correction on the head.
ralph_pedo.jpg
 
Last edited:
And these Jews and Indians go out of their way to fund and give voice to a 300lb liability who killed previous platforms that he called home? That's odd to me.
Very odd. Stream.me was run by people in the porn industry, dlive is all chinks and turks, trovo is chinks and former dlive employees and now we've got jews and street shitters. No clue why these people feel the need to cater to Gunty.
 
Very odd. Stream.me was run by people in the porn industry, dlive is all chinks and turks, trovo is chinks and former dlive employees and now we've got jews and street shitters. No clue why these people feel the need to cater to Gunty.
Despite what he allows his guests to say, these are all ethnic groups that Ethan Ralph would happily slip 3.5 desperate inches to one of their women, born with vagina or not, who scored up to a standard 6.5 on the rating scale
 
View attachment 2227761
Ralph owns the copyright of Pho talking shit and criticizing him. ❌

Then I hope Odysee puts Pho’s videos on Ralph’s channel. Ralph obviously wouldn’t want that....
In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary. It is playing Ralph's content wholesale with no commentary present. As such this is probably a good call from a legal standpoint, and I think the law would back Odysee up in this case. That being said, if Odysee decided, on it's own, that they would remove it without conforming to what is required under the DMCA, then they likely would be giving up Section 230 protections because they made an editorial decision. If Pho has no recourse--or his recourse has to include them--then Odysee could theoretically be named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Pho.

It's supposed to be "Notification > Counternotification > Lawsuit" under the DMCA. That means Ralph files the notification, including all relevant personal informaion; Pho then files his own counternotification, complete with his own information (and yes, this includes legal name and address where he can be served legal paperowkr--a PO Box works fine for this); then, Ralph has 14 days to either drop the claim, or file a lawsuit. Obviously, Ralph would do what he did with @Null previously and just let it lapse at the endo f the 14 days in order to fuck with him. At the end of that 14 days, if Ralph has not filed the lawsuit then Odysee would be required to reinstitute anything they took down.

What Tea Clips andd other clipping channels do is 100% fair use. Ralph knows this. Gator knows this. Since each clip is transformative in nature simply for be a fucking clip then they would easily pass scrutiny of the fair use. Ralph would lose, and he knows this. That's why his response is people can sue him if they don't like it. Except that's not how it works, the fat, overused prison fucktoy simply doesn't have the money to file a lawsuit, let along fucking win it. File your counternotifications, use a PO Box (it's like $50/month, people) and put the ball back in the fat faggot's court.
 
In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary. It is playing Ralph's content wholesale with no commentary present. As such this is probably a good call from a legal standpoint, and I think the law would back Odysee up in this case. That being said, if Odysee decided, on it's own, that they would remove it without conforming to what is required under the DMCA, then they likely would be giving up Section 230 protections because they made an editorial decision. If Pho has no recourse--or his recourse has to include them--then Odysee could theoretically be named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by Pho.
Pho comments during the entire stream provides criticism. He 💯 has actual commentary... His streams start before the Gunts, he plays music, talks to chat. It starts he criticizes the gunt.
 
So they completely crumble to a bullshit DMCA from a literal who? How do you not have policies to deal with this, why are these alt platforms so embarrassingly shit?
They run by skin of the teeth profit margins. They do not have the money for proper staff or bots to deal with this properly or consistently or who cannot be steamrolled by a "Memphis mauler" waaaaaaaghing uncontrollably in the support vc
 
In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary
except for the all the commentary he has where he vocalizes opinions on whats happening over ralph to the point if for some reason you cared about what he said youd miss entire chunks of his wheezing on tucker clips if pho isnt fair use ethan ralph should be sued by tucker a thousand fold since he doesnt edit anything over it and im not sure a "what! are you serious?" for two seconds out of sometimes literally over half an hour of uncut stolen content passes the test.
 
except for the all the commentary he has where he vocalizes opinions on whats happening over ralph to the point if for some reason you cared about what he said youd miss entire chunks of his wheezing on tucker clips if pho isnt fair use ethan ralph should be sued by tucker a thousand fold since he doesnt edit anything over it and im not sure a "what! are you serious?" for two seconds out of sometimes literally over half an hour of uncut stolen content passes the test.
Pho's snipes are transformative to the point that they're nearly unusable for other ayyyylawgs who want to do commentary on whatever retardation Ralph broadcast that evening
 
Since this thread is for the broadcast proper, and you read it for show specific feedback, Ethan, just to let you know:

The way you flounce your titties each time you brag on-air about banning Tea Clips, etc., and start yelling you'll do it again and so forth...that is a real highlight to me.

Please, continue to bask in the glory of causing mild-to-moderate Internet inconvenience to a handful of strangers, and know that, on air, that's when your succulent, gravy-filled breasts truly get their time to shine.

When you shimmy in delight at what a fat flaggot you are, just know that someone will .gif it, so other someones can masturbate to make fun of your jaunty, sweaty mammaries.
 
I think it's really funny PhoBingas got taken down and people are mad about it. Anyone who actually thought what Pho did was transformative is just lying, i don't even think they are under the delusion that it was transformative. The whole thing was basically just in Ralph's face "Haha I'm restreaming your content for kiwifarmers to laugh at". I mean I used his restreams sometimes too, but let's be honest at least
 
Pho comments during the entire stream provides criticism. He 💯 has actual commentary... His streams start before the Gunts, he plays music, talks to chat. It starts he criticizes the gunt.
I may be thinking of Sam, then. I know I watched a few streamsnipes probably four or five months ago, and there was no actual commentary, just a bunch of gifs and pictures. I don't know.
 
I think it's really funny PhoBingas got taken down and people are mad about it. Anyone who actually thought what Pho did was transformative is just lying, i don't even think they are under the delusion that it was transformative. The whole thing was basically just in Ralph's face "Haha I'm restreaming your content for kiwifarmers to laugh at". I mean I used his restreams sometimes too, but let's be honest at least
YOU'RE CARRYING DAT GUNT.
 
I think it's really funny PhoBingas got taken down and people are mad about it. Anyone who actually thought what Pho did was transformative is just lying, i don't even think they are under the delusion that it was transformative. The whole thing was basically just in Ralph's face "Haha I'm restreaming your content for kiwifarmers to laugh at". I mean I used his restreams sometimes too, but let's be honest at least
it depends, its just as transformative, actually far more so than nearly any instance of ralph's copyright theft. legally maybe dunno how lax it is, morally if ralph wasnt a massive hypocrite then people just wouldnt be doing it anyway. if ralph has a right on odysee to play tucker clips in full with little to nothing in the way of commentary or editing, just watching tucker uploads then something that alters the visuals and audio heavily like pho's streams should be allowed or he and ralph should be banned together.

so in short maybe not but he measures up to the bar FAR higher than the tucker restream hour.

I may be thinking of Sam, then. I know I watched a few streamsnipes probably four or five months ago, and there was no actual commentary, just a bunch of gifs and pictures. I don't know.
that was a lot of older snipes. nowadays pho has plenty of transformative commentary
 
In fairness to them, Pho adding the "transformative dancing gunt" and what-not probably does not pass the fair use test, if only because there's no actual commentary.
Did you even watch my streams? I gave commentary over them, had a soundboard and on a couple of occasions had guests and callers.
 
Back