Trans kids in the US were seeking treatment decades before today’s political battles over access to health care


In 1942, a 17-year-old transgender girl named Lane visited a doctor in her Missouri hometown with her parents. Lane had known that she was a girl from a very young age, but fights with her parents over her transness had made it difficult for her to live comfortably and openly during her childhood. She had dropped out of high school and she was determined to get out of Missouri as soon as she was old enough to pursue a career as a dancer.

The doctor reportedly found “a large portion of circulating female hormone” in her body during his examination and suggested to Lane’s parents that he undertake an exploratory laparotomy – a surgery in which he would probe her internal organs in order to find out more about her endocrine system. But the appointment ended abruptly after her father refused the surgery, feeling “the doctor did not know what he was talking about.”

I first encountered Lane’s story buried among the papers of an endocrinologist, but her brief encounter with a doctor during her teenage years was typical of many transgender children like her in the early to mid-20th century. These stories form a key thread of the first several chapters of my book, “Histories of the Transgender Child,” and they point to the tremendous obstacles these kids faced in a world where the word “transgender” didn’t even exist.

The living laboratories of gender​

In the first half of the 20th century there was nothing like today’s gender-affirming pediatric care model, which involves building a social support network and can include treatments like hormone blockers. Doctors simply did not allow trans patients to transition.

That doesn’t mean doctors and researchers weren’t interested in seeing children like Lane as patients. But instead of supporting their wishes and hopes, doctors tended to see them as canvases for experimentation – to see how their growing bodies responded to various surgeries or hormonal cocktails. In my research I tracked several decades of this kind of medical research, beginning in the early 20th century at research hospitals like the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore.

In fact, medical researchers were particularly interested in treating still-developing LGBTQ youths as a way to refine their techniques for forcing a binary sex on intersex children or carrying out conversion therapy – which aims to coerce a heterosexual or gender-confirming behavioral outcome – on gay children.

In this climate, Lane’s father may have unwittingly saved her from a harmful attempt at “corrective” surgery or hormones to try to prevent her from being trans. Even though Lane left home at age 18 to live as a woman, she would have to wait over a decade before finally obtaining access to hormones and surgery in the mid-1950s.

Trans childhoods before trans medicine​

The struggles of trans children in the era before modern transgender medicine show not just how trans youths are far from a new phenomenon, but also how tenacious and forward-thinking they were compared with their parents and doctors.

Two stories of other trans people like Lane show how clinicians’ refusal to let them transition never stopped them from being trans. Both of them found their way to the Johns Hopkins Hospital, which, during the first seven decades of the 20th century, was widely regarded as the one institution in the U.S. for people with questions about their sex and gender.

When psychologists at Johns Hopkins interviewed a retired trans woman from the Midwest in 1954, she told them about her childhood in the 1890s. Even then, without any concept or term for being trans, this woman – by then in her 60s – told them it was obvious to her that she was a girl.

“I wanted a doll and buggy very much,” she reminisced of her intense attachment to the toys given only to girls. While her wish to be a girl never waned, her life had never afforded her the opportunity to transition to living full time as a woman until she retired.

Five years later, the clinicians at Johns Hopkins met a trans man who was then in his 30s. He had come to them seeking top and bottom surgery. Growing up in rural upstate New York in the 1930s, he had been forced to drop out of school “because of the excruciating sense of embarrassment at being obliged to wear girls’ clothes.”

Unlike the trans woman from the Midwest, this trans man, as a teenager, found a path to living openly as a boy: manual labor at a lumber mill. By working in a men’s profession and proving his masculinity through showcasing his strength, his presentation as a boy was embraced by his community. Decades later, he sought out the doctors at Hopkins only to confirm what had long been true in his life: that he was a man.

Growing up despite every obstacle​

Each of these three children – like the countless more from this early 20th-century era – had to wait until adulthood to finally transition.

Yet the failure of doctors and other gatekeepers to stop them from transitioning as children, and their inability to access any form of gender-affirming medical treatment, hardly prevented them from being trans or growing up to be trans adults.

This is all the more remarkable given that before the 1950s, very few Americans had access to any concept or information about trans life. While small communities of adult trans people are evident as far back as the turn of the 20th century, most children would not have had access to these discreet social worlds, which tended to exist in major cities like New York and San Francisco. Without any media to supposedly influence them and without role models, these remarkable young people were able to stay true their inner feelings en route to living trans lives.

They’re a reminder that conversion therapy, attempts to suppress or limit transness and gatekeeping through legislation don’t work.

They didn’t work a century ago and they won’t work today.
 
Just read up on the articles (also please read some of the articles the second one was cited by, im not shitting on it, just a funny observation). While yes it is very very obvious that there a high comorbidity between gender dysphoria and autism (even knowing a bunch makes it obvious) the idea that gender dysphoria is a fetish is beyond retarded. While I can't pull anything up (read: im too lazy) I can assure you that the idea in and of itself being a fetish is popularized by Dr. Blanchard who is a self-confessed tranny chasing (totally not projecting) kike who hasn't changed his theory in 40 years despite evidence to the contrary. The fact the people like Kevin Gibes believe in his shit should be proof further as to why you shouldn't believe his bullcrap.
Are you really trying to act like AGPs do not exist? I agree that "all" trannies aren't fetishists, but I'd argue a pretty fair share of them are in it for that these days.
 
You know, we used to perform lobotomies in the 20th century, too.

And we used to jail people for being gay.
I thought we used to pay them disability checks.

Though, I guess I couldn't speak about Canada.

Hopefully one day there will be a better way to treat trans people, but at the moment, hormones and chopping or stuffing shit is the only way.
Castrating people, slicing and flowering out their penises, carving a canal in their pelvises, reappropriating their intestines to create an inert parody of a uterus, and setting them up for increased risk of cancer, sepsis, and osteoporosis all for gynecomastia "breasts" are as much "treatment" for gender dysphoria as lobotomy was for grief.

The stability of a trans person isn't contingent on whether they've mutilated their body, it's contingent on whether they can put themselves in a community that will humor their sexual delusion. When they lose that, no amount of barbaric body treatment will save them from what is likely to evolve into suicidal ideation.
 
Last edited:
You know, we used to perform lobotomies in the 20th century, too.


I thought we used to pay them disability checks.

Though, I guess I couldn't speak about Canada.


Castrating people, carving a canal in their pelvises, reappropriating their intestines to create an inert parody of a uterus, and setting them up for increased risk of cancer, sepsis, and osteoporosis all for gynecomastia "breasts" are as much "treatment" for gender dysphoria as lobotomy was for grief.

The stability of a trans person isn't contingent on whether they've mutilated their body, it's contingent on whether they can put themselves in a community that will humor their sexual delusion. When they lose that, no amount of barbaric body treatment will save them from what is likely to evolve into suicidal ideation.
Lobotomy would legitimately be a better 'cure' for dysphoria than transitioning is. Lifelong pain and still having the disconnect between your body and your self image, and having to continually maintain the "treatment" you've gotten... or dull numbness?
 
Lobotomy would legitimately be a better 'cure' for dysphoria than transitioning is. Lifelong pain and still having the disconnect between your body and your self image, and having to continually maintain the "treatment" you've gotten... or dull numbness?
If you start HRT young enough, you're already lobotomizing yourself.
 
Are you really trying to act like AGPs do not exist? I agree that "all" trannies aren't fetishists, but I'd argue a pretty fair share of them are in it for that these days.
Oh god no I am not saying AGP's don't exist lol. I'm saying that Blanchard's theory almost boils down to "either you're a fetishist or a gay man" which is not at all the case.
Hey I was making cake, had more important stuff to worry about.
That's an interesting way of saying their mentally ill abusive parents seeking the "treatment" for their kids.
I have met kids (18 years old, but still that's kid for me) that started hormones as young as 13 by buying it online without their parents knowing. (Luckily those have also been legit and like not trenders)
 
@Kenya Jones your avatar is extremely fitting. Most of tranny-dom is a forced trend that is fucking up people's lives right now.
I wouldn't say most of it, but I will agree that there is a LARGE portion that is forced (and which usually affects young kids) into believing they have a VERY serious condition. It's similar to the people trying to say they're autistic or whatever flavor of mental illness because it seems cool and hip to be different and quirky when in reality it ruins people.
 
I wouldn't say most of it, but I will agree that there is a LARGE portion that is forced (and which usually affects young kids) into believing they have a VERY serious condition. It's similar to the people trying to say they're autistic or whatever flavor of mental illness because it seems cool and hip to be different and quirky when in reality it ruins people.
Atleast claiming to have autism doesn't lead to mutilation and a fucked endocrine system
 
This story is made up BS. Glad to know this is the writer.

View attachment 2223252
"It puts the lotion in the basket. It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again."
The capacity for lego models to be disassembled and reassembled into something completely new is a metaphor for children deconstructing their gender in an attempt to form something entirely them. The pegs on top being inserted into the holes on the bottom of each piece is an inherently sexual demonstration that power much be exerted to enact change.
Legos are inherently both queer and revolutionary.
TFW this could actually be a news article today..... (:_(
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Flaming Insignias
If you put even the tiniest amount of research into why gender dysphoria may occur,
Because dad molested them. It is not a physical ailment, it is a behavioral disorder.
I'm saying that Blanchard's theory almost boils down to "either you're a fetishist or a gay man" which is not at all the case.
It is absolutely the case.
 
Because dad molested them. It is not a physical ailment, it is a behavioral disorder.

It is absolutely the case.
Of like the 50+ trans people I have met over the last 7 months I can only think of 2 people that were molested.
 
Got into a big /lgbt/ server where 90% of the users are trans. Next, be likable.
That's not meeting people. You don't have to see their behavioral tics, you don't have to see the disgusting way they dress, you don't have to smell them. The reason trannies love discord is because it makes it easy to hide who you are and become a new persona. You get to be your anime avatar. No one in discord is gonna tell you they were molested, dude.
 
That's not meeting people. You don't have to see their behavioral tics, you don't have to see the disgusting way they dress, you don't have to smell them. The reason trannies love discord is because it makes it easy to hide who you are and become a new persona. You get to be your anime avatar. No one in discord is gonna tell you they were molested, dude.
You forgot that they're also all autistic and have 0 filter and will dump their entire story if you just befriend them a tiny bit. I know for sure because despite what a lot of people think, a lot of them will tell you about how they got physically and verbally abused as children.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
You forgot that they're also all autistic and have 0 filter and will dump their entire story if you just befriend them a tiny bit. I know for sure because despite what a lot of people think, a lot of them will tell you about how they got physically and verbally abused as children.
You just said 48 of 50 of them won't tell you that. Autistic trannies have a massive fucking filter, everything has to be filtered through whether or not it validates their delusions.
 
Back