- Joined
- Jun 4, 2019
I want my children to have monkey skills.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's better than having Tard Baby skills, and could probably get u more gibsI want my children to have monkey skills.
There's nothing wrong with wanting kids.Gentlemen, it behooves me to revive a thread as dead as your kids shall be shy of a century to commune with ye "imperatives" and tell you that they bemuse me as much as they hex thee. Truly, there is nothing as hilarious and petty as being preoccupied with wanting children. A cluster of cells half-salient for decades on end that become a drain on your wallet, hopes and aspirations in tandem and to no avail. I claim that most of you are idiots coaxed by societal pressures to deliver blobs upon the earth if for no other reason than to secure a perverted legacy. And what a funny thing, legacy - to think that any of it matters in a grand scheme of things! Please, procreate. I want to laugh at your healths' speedy ailments looking after little shits that didn't even ask to be born.![]()
I would be surprised if Null ever has kids, at least biological. I think that would be some form of child cruelty. But that doesn't change the fact that for one, having children is a deeply rooted biological need. Sex isn't the only thing hard-wired into us to assure the human race's continued existence, we also have a great need to raise children, women moreso than men.There's nothing wrong with wanting kids.
But there's something really autistic about deriving the need to have kids from first principles and growing banana peppers in your bachelor pad to prepare for it.
If you want to talk about the most natural family settings, humans used to live in tribes. Children were raised by the entire tribe. Men did not bail the minute a child was born, they just weren't committed to caring for the mother specifically. The argument of males being non-monogamous is an argument against modern relationships more than it is an argument against traditional families.Families in the traditional sense are unnecessary for procreation. Most males in nature don't stay around to raise their offspring. Enough single mothers with deadbeat dads and the kids still survive and grow up fine.
Citation very much needed.If you want to talk about the most natural family settings, humans used to live in tribes. Children were raised by the entire tribe. Men did not bail the minute a child was born, they just weren't committed to caring for the mother specifically. The argument of males being non-monogamous is an argument against modern relationships more than it is an argument against traditional families.
My ass. If you want citations, go to one of the real forums.Citation very much needed.
I'm saying that's horseshit.My ass. If you want citations, go to one of the real forums.
That's an interesting way to put it. I've got a mate who says he never wants kids ("I've just never looked at a kid and thought, yeah I want one of them" <- this was in response to me telling him that my wife is pregnant, classySame thing goes if you're one of these people who don't like kids. Not liking kids isn't some quirk, like some people have it some people don't. It's what they call a glaring personality flaw and you should treat it like a mad temper or social anxiety.