Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I really wonder what Melinda gets out of posting in this thread.
Interaction with well-adjusted adult people, lots of good advice, someone listening and reacting to what she says, various perspectives on things that interest her. As hostile as this interaction is at times it's still a net positive.
It goes to show that it's not a widespread opportunity
It's not and it can't be. If everybody was a millionaire a million would be worthless.
 
Interaction with well-adjusted adult people, lots of good advice, someone listening and reacting to what she says, various perspectives on things that interest her. As hostile as this interaction is at times it's still a net positive.

It's not and it can't be. If everybody was a millionaire a million would be worthless.
Inflation would be insane.
 
I stay home to raise my children at home for their advantage and because of my religious beliefs.

Be honest: only one of these things is true. What you are doing is absolutely not for your children's benefit, you are crippling them for life because that way they will never leave you and seek a life for themselves amongst the wider society we all live in.


I really wonder what Melinda gets out of posting in this thread.

We're the only rational, thinking adults that pay Melinda the slightest bit of attention. Marshall's a moron, her children are children, and she is incapable of having friendly relationships with people IRL. We know how popular she's been among the fellow denizens of Pooter Creek. She's gotten in physical altercations with neighbors multiple times, she's applied for restraining orders against over a dozen people, she's had multiple investigations from CPS. I think she's probably one of the most disliked people in town. All of those neighbors and those recipients of restraining orders have friends and family in town. She's the outsider.
 
It's not and it can't be. If everybody was a millionaire a million would be worthless.
So you admit then that Corporate Capitalism is a system in which there are "haves" and "have nots".

So if you admit that, you cannot then disparage the redistribution of wealth through government intervention



I get you wouldn't understand such things Melinda because you refuse to work and have never seen close to 50k a year let alone even six figures. You prefer to sit at home and sit on your ass all day while tax payers have to give you money.
👆👆👆narcissistic reframing

Wow, your comment is so loaded with falsehood. Typical Goy!

Newsflash: I am a Taxpayer and I always will be until the day of depart this earth. It's my own money I receive back from the government. Those are my taxes I have paid and also a loan on taxes I will pay in the future.

Even if some of it is the taxes of wealthy Corporations, Billionaires and Millionaires, I see nothing unethical about it. Men who created a system to exclude breastfeeding women deserve to pay out. It's their own fault. Don't make a corporate system that is anti-breastfeeding and anti-family and there would be more participants.

Men who created a system where you are at an advantage if your parents gave you start up money for businesses deserve to pay out. The redistribution of wealth is ethical. Don't make "haves" and "have nots" if you don't want peasants at your door post with pitchforks.

"Both oppressing the poor to enrich oneself and giving to the rich yield only loss." (Proverbs 22:16)

Another NEWSFLASH: I have a Bachelor's degree. $50k+ is easily within my reach in many parts of VA. I choose to forego that in order to homeschool my children.

You're simply unable to understand the simple fact that homeschooling parents sacrifice income in exchange for moral principles/religious beliefs.

You're also unwilling to admit economic disparities exist in Capitalism. Or in other words, Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of all members of society.

You believe the lie that work ethic is the solution to build a fortune in all circumstances for all people. You're absolutely brainwashed. It also Itakes gifts and inheritance to build fortunes and the people left out are former foster children, people with cold-hearted, selfish or tight fisted parents and racial minorities. Also white people who come from poor regions/poor families unable to build wealth because they are economically disadvantaged.

You also don't understand the dynamics of generational poverty, issues former foster children face, and the dynamics of being a child of a drug addict. You live in delusions of an equal and fair world.

If my parents gave me money during their lifetime or an inheritance upon their death my life would have been enhanced and improved. Neither of my parents did either.

Donald Trump's father gave him a million dollars to start his first business.

Why not give everyone a million dollars to start their first business? Otherwise you're supporting the very economic theory ("haves" and "have nots") that drives government intervention. You're making a circular argument full of illogical conclusions!

You should read Zitelmann's The Wealth Elite. 66% factor in their talent as salespeople for helping them get rich. Doesn't matter what field it was in.

Hell the CEO for Netflix went around as a door to door vacuum salesman.

What's the number 2 job for CEO's on Linkedin before they became CEO's? Sales.

"A study by Fidelity Investments found that 88% of millionaires are self-made millionaires."
This study is also mentioned by other websites, and supported by Forbes own research. So far, there are two different sources to your none.

But one of the links you cited earlier says 79%, not 50 people.
Only the fact that disproves her narrative. Taking the article as truth, only 21% got there through inheritence, which still shows that most are self made.


88% of millionaires are not "self-made". That's a false claim they make because they ran businesses with their own hands. It's not "self made" when they inherited start up money for their business from their parents.

"As commentator Jim Hightower has colorfully put it, most of our super rich were born on third base and think they hit a triple.."

Source: https://ips-dc.org/the_self-made_hallucination_of_americas_rich/


It is. Investing your own money, and managing to profit from that, is the very definition of "self-made
It's not their own money. Their parents and grandparents gave it to them in the majority of cases.



What you are doing is absolutely not for your children's benefit,

According to who? You Goyim? That's laughable.


We're the only rational, thinking adults that pay Melinda the slightest bit of attention.
You're neither rational nor the only source of adult interaction I come by in my day to day.

You're Goyim, most of you. A few of you I suspect to be a Ger.

I already stated my reasons for typing on this thread.
 
All I’m seeing here is “FUCKING REEEEEEE IM A POOR PIECE OF SHIT BUT I’M GOING TO BLAME IT ON HAVING A LITTER OF PIGLETS. I TOTALLY COULD HAVE A LIVABLE WAGE SINCE I COMPLETED A NOTHING BURGER BACHELOR DEGREE, BUT THATS TOO HARD FOR ME.”
This is the most consistent whining we’ve seen in a while. Must really have a stick up her butt about being dirt poor of her own volition and making excuses for why she hasn’t gotten an actual job to support her family.

NEWSFLASH: Plenty of single parent households function just fine on a livable wage after they’ve put their college degree to use. Off hand I’d say I know about 30 of such cases in my day to day life and 15 of them would fit Smelly Kelly’s ridiculous standards of no birth control, no abortion, no public school, no nannies, no babysitters, no bottle or formula, and they even work from home with an actual wage. She just can’t accept their existence or all the delusional walls she put up around her will shatter revealing she’s just an unfit mother refusing to put in any work towards bettering her piglets lives. Can’t put any of the blame on herself, no sir.

Cue Mel asking for census details and tax return forms of the 15 or so people that live life just fine.
 
When is this idiot going to learn to read? She's nearly 40 and claims to be intelligent yet she always posts this sort of trash.

All I’m seeing here is “FUCKING REEEEEEE IM A POOR PIECE OF SHIT BUT I’M GOING TO BLAME IT ON HAVING A LITTER OF PIGLETS. I TOTALLY COULD HAVE A LIVABLE WAGE SINCE I COMPLETED A NOTHING BURGER BACHELOR DEGREE, BUT THATS TOO HARD FOR ME.”
This is the most consistent whining we’ve seen in a while. Must really have a stick up her butt about being dirt poor of her own volition and making excuses for why she hasn’t gotten an actual job to support her family.

NEWSFLASH: Plenty of single parent households function just fine on a livable wage after they’ve put their college degree to use. Off hand I’d say I know about 30 of such cases in my day to day life and 15 of them would fit Smelly Kelly’s ridiculous standards of no birth control, no abortion, no public school, no nannies, no babysitters, no bottle or formula, and they even work from home with an actual wage. She just can’t accept their existence or all the delusional walls she put up around her will shatter revealing she’s just an unfit mother refusing to put in any work towards bettering her piglets lives. Can’t put any of the blame on herself, no sir.

Cue Mel asking for census details and tax return forms of the 15 or so people that live life just fine.
Agreed, all she wants is hand outs.
 
So you admit then that Corporate Capitalism is a system in which there are "haves" and "have nots".
Yes, people can succeed, and they can fail. Shocker, I know. It's literally the same in every financial system ever conceived. Some people are simply smarter, others are faster, some are more creative, and there are some who are either none of those, or simply do not try to put in an effort (like you)
Emperor Charles vi Britannia summed up it pretty well:
Donald Trump edit:
So if you admit that, you cannot then disparage the redistribution of wealth through government intervention
You can. The more government redistribution there is, there more likely the entire economy is to crash. The more people are on benefits, the less people are financing those benefits. After a certain point, everything crashes. There's also a big problem that when people are on benefits, they do not want to work. That's a big problem with Biden Administration, they are paying people too much money to not work. And, so, people don't work. And the economy is falling. To put it in perspective, 44% of all job owners report that they can't get jobs, because the feds are paying people too much to not work. It's gotten so bad, that some stores are paying people to just show up for an interview. States that follow Biden's socialist orders are suffering, those that do not are doing great. My words are also supported by U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Biden's team admits that their bullshit is causing massive inflation. The Socialistic policies have forced the world into inflation levels not since since 2008. Consumer prices are on their fastest rise since 2008, and are the highest since 2008.
If that is too complicated, here's a cartoon that explains the issue somewhat easier
narcissistic reframing

Wow, your comment is so loaded with falsehood. Typical Goy!

Newsflash: I am a Taxpayer and I always will be until the day of depart this earth. It's my own money I receive back from the government. Those are my taxes I have paid and also a loan on taxes I will pay in the future.

Even if some of it is the taxes of wealthy Corporations, Billionaires and Millionaires, I see nothing unethical about it. Men who created a system to exclude breastfeeding women deserve to pay out. It's their own fault. Don't make a corporate system that is anti-breastfeeding and anti-family and there would be more participants.

Men who created a system where you are at an advantage if your parents gave you start up money for businesses deserve to pay out. The redistribution of wealth is ethical. Don't make "haves" and "have nots" if you don't want peasants at your door post with pitchforks.

"Both oppressing the poor to enrich oneself and giving to the rich yield only loss." (Proverbs 22:16)

Another NEWSFLASH: I have a Bachelor's degree. $50k+ is easily within my reach in many parts of VA. I choose to forego that in order to homeschool my children.

You're simply unable to understand the simple fact that homeschooling parents sacrifice income in exchange for moral principles/religious beliefs.

You're also unwilling to admit economic disparities exist in Capitalism. Or in other words, Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of all members of society.

You believe the lie that work ethic is the solution to build a fortune in all circumstances for all people. You're absolutely brainwashed. It also Itakes gifts and inheritance to build fortunes and the people left out are former foster children, people with cold-hearted, selfish or tight fisted parents and racial minorities. Also white people who come from poor regions/poor families unable to build wealth because they are economically disadvantaged.

You also don't understand the dynamics of generational poverty, issues former foster children face, and the dynamics of being a child of a drug addict. You live in delusions of an equal and fair world.

If my parents gave me money during their lifetime or an inheritance upon their death my life would have been enhanced and improved. Neither of my parents did either.

Donald Trump's father gave him a million dollars to start his first business.

Why not give everyone a million dollars to start their first business? Otherwise you're supporting the very economic theory ("haves" and "have nots") that drives government intervention. You're making a circular argument full of illogical conclusions!
For someone complaining about others lack of citations, you sure have a big lack of them yourself.
88% of millionaires are not "self-made". That's a false claim they make because they ran businesses with their own hands. It's not "self made" when they inherited start up money for their business from their parents.

"As commentator Jim Hightower has colorfully put it, most of our super rich were born on third base and think they hit a triple.."

Source: https://ips-dc.org/the_self-made_hallucination_of_americas_rich/
Have you read the article, though? They completely rely on study done in less than 24 hours. Even if everything they said was true (highly doubtful), only thing they managed to critique is Forbes' pick of highest billionaires. It quite literally attacked a straw man.
Here's some facts, over 50 percent of Americans find themselves among the top 10 percent of income-earners for at least one year during their working lives. Over 11 percent of Americans will be counted among the top 1 percent of income-earners for at least one year.
It's not their own money. Their parents and grandparents gave it to them in the majority of cases.
To start a small business with a hope of success, you will need around 30 grand. Whatever you got it from bank or somewhere else, it is now your money to spend. And everything you will earn going forward, will have to be reinvested into your business, so it doesn't collapse. I don't understand why simple concepts are so hard to get for you. You don't spend 1 mln and magically gain a working business, this is not a disney movie.
Look at history of communists like you. Any nation they touch ends up with an inflation ranging upwards to 42 quadrillion. Communists come, destroy, and leave. They are never sustainable even in their ideal state, and they are never in their ideal state. You are a filthy commie.
 
Last edited:
The more people are on benefits, the less people are financing those benefits
This is a non-issue.

If a President owns 50 billion in assets and shares 30 billion with 15,000 subjects under his care, everyone still has what they need.

Nobody needs to hoard more than a billion dollars to themselves. After 1 billion, the person or corporation should be taxed for the rest.


Off hand I’d say I know about 30 of such cases in my day to day life and 15 of them would fit Smelly Kelly’s ridiculous standards of no birth control, no abortion, no public school, no nannies, no babysitters, no bottle or formula, and they even work from home with an actual wage.
Made up number and stories. I don't believe you, not in the least bit.

I've met 100s of homeschooling parents over the last 15 years. 100s of single parents homeschooling. Number one complaint? Problems financing the operation.

In the last 15 years of me being a mother I have never met one parent who raised their children from home from DAY 1 (birth of their child) that didn't accept some kind of help from parents, relatives, a religious community or the government in order to balance their budget. Savings from working outside of the home before homeschooling doesn't count.

You're full of bologna.

There's also a big problem that when people are on benefits, they do not want to work.

Why is that a "problem"? Why do you make the assumption that people owe anyone their time and labor? Before creating "the grid" and "the system" did someone take a vote and ask who wanted to participate? No, they didn't.

People have a right to reject Capitalism and the system. Being born a citizen of a country isn't a contract for forced participation in an economic system. In fact, the US Constitution protects against involuntary servitude.

If a bunch of men are going to get together and design a system where a person must have perpetual money in order to feed, clothe and house themselves, than that's the issue of the people who designed that system. Not the issue of those who refuse to participate in it.

Elohim gave land and resources FREE for all to glean and harvest. What gives any man a right to claim natural resources and then demand others pay for them?

If Capitalists can use the government to build their businesses and corporations, then Socialists can use the Government to snatch the money back in the name of equality. So many wealthy families got their money from Government permits to take coal, timber, oil, land, water, and other natural resources from the earth, while blocking access to them for all. Then they turned around and sold them to the masses for a profit.

So by the same stroke, poorer families can use the Government to level the playing field since their access to what Elohim gave them free in the first place has been blocked.

One can only hope they won't start charging people for air in the next 30 years
 
This is a non-issue.

If a President owns 50 billion in assets and shares 30 billion with 15,000 subjects under his care, everyone still has what they need.

Nobody needs to hoard more than a billion dollars to themselves. After 1 billion, the person or corporation should be taxed for the rest.



Made up number and stories. I don't believe you, not in the least bit.

I've met 100s of homeschooling parents over the last 15 years. 100s of single parents homeschooling. Number one complaint? Problems financing the operation.

In the last 15 years of me being a mother I have never met one parent who raised their children from home from DAY 1 (birth of their child) that didn't accept some kind of help from parents, relatives, a religious community or the government in order to balance their budget. Savings from working outside of the home before homeschooling doesn't count.

You're full of bologna.



Why is that a "problem"? Why do you make the assumption that people owe anyone their time and labor? Before creating "the grid" and "the system" did someone take a vote and ask who wanted to participate? No, they didn't.

People have a right to reject Capitalism and the system. Being born a citizen of a country isn't a contract for forced participation in an economic system. In fact, the US Constitution protects against involuntary servitude.

If a bunch of men are going to get together and design a system where a person must have perpetual money in order to feed, clothe and house themselves, than that's the issue of the people who designed that system. Not the issue of those who refuse to participate in it.

Elohim gave land and resources FREE for all to glean and harvest. What gives any man a right to claim natural resources and then demand others pay for them?

If Capitalists can use the government to build their businesses and corporations, then Socialists can use the Government to snatch the money back in the name of equality. So many wealthy families got their money from Government permits to take coal, timber, oil, land, water, and other natural resources from the earth, while blocking access to them for all. Then they turned around and sold them to the masses for a profit.

So by the same stroke, poorer families can use the Government to level the playing field since their access to what Elohim gave them free in the first place has been blocked.

One can only hope they won't start charging people for air in the next 30 years
Oh melly. :story:But the 100’s of people you’ve met were poor sacks of shit like yourself so it’s no surprise they can’t manage to do anything right either. I’m in a better position to meet more of them than you have. Deny all you want, sweetheart. We all know it’s the only way you can preserve your illusion that you’re a good mom. Pretend I only speak lies and bologna, dear.

I already told you about my good neighbor and you all but asked their social security numbers to look them up.

Also. Money made before homeschooling doesn’t count? Why the fuck not? Some kid starts working at 16 and saves up a few grand but, nope. Can’t put that towards the kids. Because it wasn’t made with a tot hanging from a tit.
 
This is a non-issue
It is a massive issue in US. Since you seem to be unable to read complicated stuff, here's a simple cartoon to explain it to you. If you feel like you can handle big words, here's couple of articles showing the problem. Since 1960s, the amount of people paying for a single person living off social benefits dropped from 41 to 2.9 (as of 2010), (2.8 as of 2013) which proves that I was correct in my earlier post as to why this is falling apart. By 2030, the number was expected to drop to just 2 per 1. This study was done pre-Covid times, and given the massive usage of social benefits now, the number has likely changed for the worse (gov thought that it would fall to 2.6 in 2020). Congress actually released a very detailed report, explaining the faults in this system, repeating many of the same arguments I have. The entire benefits system is expected to die by 2031 (and this is using 2020 data). This covid spending? It killed 3 years worth of social benefits. And, Mel? You are part of this problem. Congrats, your inability to find a job will leave you, and your children, starving in about a decade.
If a President owns 50 billion in assets and shares 30 billion with 15,000 subjects under his care, everyone still has what they need.
Your failure at basic understanding of assets and math, is simply astonishing. I'm not going to explain why you can't simply share assets as you imagine, and the 15k number is no where near the amount of people using social security (or the president's finite worth (asset-wise) and finances), I'm simply going to show you this:
Screenshot 2021-06-08 234824.png
Screenshot 2021-06-08 235030.png
Seems like your math is off by at least 9k.
Nobody needs to hoard more than a billion dollars to themselves. After 1 billion, the person or corporation should be taxed for the rest.
Let's say everyone is as retarded as you, and US tries to do that. What happens? Hint hint, the company moves to Latvia, and US loses billions in revenue, and the economy shrinks. Basic economy, commie.
Why is that a "problem"?
Because somebody needs to work to finance both the economy, and the people relying on social benefits.
Oh melly. :story:But the 100’s of people you’ve met were poor sacks of shit like yourself so it’s no surprise they can’t manage to do anything right either. I’m in a better position to meet more of them than you have. Deny all you want, sweetheart. We all know it’s the only way you can preserve your illusion that you’re a good mom. Pretend I only speak lies and bologna, dear.
I remember listing Mel tons of jobs she could do while homeschooling and breastfeeding. She ignored it and continued to whine about capitalism. Because commies like her are allergic to work.
 
If someone is so evil that they are causing you misery, then why the fuck would you stay with them? Why just stand there saying someone makes you feeling miserable?
This is a funny viewpoint to have because we've also made this exact same argument about you coming back to the farms over and over again. Also, your baby daughter is surprisingly cute, but where did the blonde hair come from?
 
So you admit then that Corporate Capitalism is a system in which there are "haves" and "have nots".
Don't think there is a system free of this issue. In capitalism the rich form the oligarchy, in socialism - members of the party \ the governing body form the oligarchy. There will always be disproportions.

So if you admit that, you cannot then disparage the redistribution of wealth through government intervention
Have I at any point said I want capitalism in its pure form, without any form of social contract? No, I never said such thing. I said what we need is taking the best parts of both system and mitigate the worst parts of both systems.
I don't want people who can't work due to, for example, health-related issues to be deprived of their food, insurance and healthcare. I don't want people who lose a job to end up on the street within a month because they can't afford paying the bills. I want people, myself included, to enjoy some form of retirement pensions or disability benefits when they need it. I am or I would gladly pay my share in taxes to co-fund all those.
What I don't want is sponsoring welfare for people who can support themselves but choose not to.

You're simply unable to understand the simple fact that homeschooling parents sacrifice income in exchange for moral principles/religious beliefs.
School is like 20% about what they teach you and 80% about what you learn about the world and how it operates by simply being there. I don't believe children should be deprived of that 80%. It may not always be fun and pleasant but it's useful later in life.
If you insist on homeschooling I think the only sensible way to do this is to have one parent providing for the family and the other taking care of the house and teaching the kids. Eventually if someone's a good teacher, why not teach other people's kids and earn some money this way?

Why not give everyone a million dollars to start their first business?
I'm not sure you understand how money works and what money is. In simplest terms, money does not have value of its own, it represents value of country's economy. If we print enough money to give everybody a million bucks then a million bucks will become worthless because the economy did not grow - the new money is "empty" and does not represent any new value.

Why is that a "problem"? Why do you make the assumption that people owe anyone their time and labor? Before creating "the grid" and "the system" did someone take a vote and ask who wanted to participate? No, they didn't.
The problem is, things need to be done. People will not work out of the goodness of their hearts, they need some motivation. Money is such motivation.
If we give people money for free they will not have any reason to work: no workers in factories, nobody to sell you your groceries, nobody to fix leaking pipe, nobody to bake bread or maintain critical infrastructure.
I mean, I work since I legally can. Would I keep working if I got enough free cash to live comfortably to the end of my days? Forget about it, I'm retiring the day first check comes.
That's where the problem is.
 
So you admit then that Corporate Capitalism is a system in which there are "haves" and "have nots".

So if you admit that, you cannot then disparage the redistribution of wealth through government intervention




👆👆👆narcissistic reframing

Wow, your comment is so loaded with falsehood. Typical Goy!

Newsflash: I am a Taxpayer and I always will be until the day of depart this earth. It's my own money I receive back from the government. Those are my taxes I have paid and also a loan on taxes I will pay in the future.

Even if some of it is the taxes of wealthy Corporations, Billionaires and Millionaires, I see nothing unethical about it. Men who created a system to exclude breastfeeding women deserve to pay out. It's their own fault. Don't make a corporate system that is anti-breastfeeding and anti-family and there would be more participants.

Men who created a system where you are at an advantage if your parents gave you start up money for businesses deserve to pay out. The redistribution of wealth is ethical. Don't make "haves" and "have nots" if you don't want peasants at your door post with pitchforks.

"Both oppressing the poor to enrich oneself and giving to the rich yield only loss." (Proverbs 22:16)

Another NEWSFLASH: I have a Bachelor's degree. $50k+ is easily within my reach in many parts of VA. I choose to forego that in order to homeschool my children.

You're simply unable to understand the simple fact that homeschooling parents sacrifice income in exchange for moral principles/religious beliefs.

You're also unwilling to admit economic disparities exist in Capitalism. Or in other words, Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of all members of society.

You believe the lie that work ethic is the solution to build a fortune in all circumstances for all people. You're absolutely brainwashed. It also Itakes gifts and inheritance to build fortunes and the people left out are former foster children, people with cold-hearted, selfish or tight fisted parents and racial minorities. Also white people who come from poor regions/poor families unable to build wealth because they are economically disadvantaged.

You also don't understand the dynamics of generational poverty, issues former foster children face, and the dynamics of being a child of a drug addict. You live in delusions of an equal and fair world.

If my parents gave me money during their lifetime or an inheritance upon their death my life would have been enhanced and improved. Neither of my parents did either.

Donald Trump's father gave him a million dollars to start his first business.

Why not give everyone a million dollars to start their first business? Otherwise you're supporting the very economic theory ("haves" and "have nots") that drives government intervention. You're making a circular argument full of illogical conclusions!









88% of millionaires are not "self-made". That's a false claim they make because they ran businesses with their own hands. It's not "self made" when they inherited start up money for their business from their parents.

"As commentator Jim Hightower has colorfully put it, most of our super rich were born on third base and think they hit a triple.."

Source: https://ips-dc.org/the_self-made_hallucination_of_americas_rich/



It's not their own money. Their parents and grandparents gave it to them in the majority of cases.





According to who? You Goyim? That's laughable.



You're neither rational nor the only source of adult interaction I come by in my day to day.

You're Goyim, most of you. A few of you I suspect to be a Ger.

I already stated my reasons for typing on this thread.
Just don't be poor you dumb retard
 
This is a funny viewpoint to have because we've also made this exact same argument about you coming back to the farms over and over again. Also, your baby daughter is surprisingly cute, but where did the blonde hair come from?
It's pretty common for brunettes to be born with blonde hair and it slowly change colour.
 
Some kid starts working at 16 and saves up a few grand but, nope
I got my first job at 16 and every penny went toward my first car which was necessary for survival and then paying rent once I turned 17. I paid for my own toiletries, clothes, shoes and school supplies with my job since 16

So again, you're talking about relying on parents. NEWSFLASH: You can't save money at 16 unless you're living rent free with your parents and they are paying your expenses.

Once again, you've failed to describe a situation where a person isn't relying on resources from their parents.

I knew a guy once whose mom put him on a raft and he floated across the Gulf of Mexico and then landed on the shore of Florida as an illegal immigrant, at 15 years old. He begged in the streets for food. How much money do you think he was able to save from 16 to 20?

CHECKMATE!


Oh melly. :story:But the 100’s of people you’ve met were poor sacks of shit like yourself so it’s no surprise they can’t manage to do anything right either. I’m in a better position to meet more of them than you have. Deny all you want, sweetheart. We all know it’s the only way you can preserve your illusion that you’re a good mom. Pretend I only speak lies and bologna, dear.

I already told you about my good neighbor and you all but asked their social security numbers to look them up.
You can't produce a single specimen. You're full of made up stories. Not buying it.

The very fact that millions of Americans need a stimulus check in order to survive homeschooling their parents while still working from home proves my point.
 
You can't produce a single specimen. You're full of made up stories. Not buying it.
Melinda: absolutely no one does this thing
Everybody in this thread: actually, I personally know someone who does that thing.
Melinda: give me their address, date of birth, Mastercard number and astrology chart
Everybody else: no? What the fuck?
Melinda: CHECKMATE YOU'RE A LIAR BECAUSE YOU WON'T DOX YOUR FRIEND
 
Back