Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

This is the most sane and normal thing that you've ever said regarding your proclivities. So why did you hook up with a mouth-breathing window-licker like Marshall? If he's read a book since his stint in jail in California, I would be shocked. He's also not alternative or skater or even a cowboy. He's a suburban retard from a shitty part of California.

I don't know what a window-licker is. Never heard that before.

In my opinion, Marshall falls under Cowboy and Skater category. He actually skateboards quite well.

He was not actually raised in the suburbs. He was raised in some of the toughest streets in California, that's why he's battle hardened.

Marshall attracted me for several reasons. Mostly religious beliefs we share in common.


God is a capitalist, not a socialist.

Incorrect. Elohim is a socialist. The land of Israel was given to all Israelites FOR FREE. The Torah commands socialism as well.

How much did Elohim charge you Goyim to live on the land They created?

Humans put a price on land, Elohim did not. Humans put a price on food, Elohim did not. The list goes on...

You really should stop trying to make so many enemies all the time, you're racing to your own ruin if you keep it up.
I disagree with this premise.

If you distinguish what you stand for, those who stand for the same values and beliefs will always stand with you.




How does that work with a soul, btw? If you have a soul and it looks like you, does that mean that God guided the "you" sperm cell to the egg? What if your parents never met, or hooked up with other people instead? You wouldn't exist, would you? So what about the "you" soul? Did God guide your parents to meet, guide the sperm to the egg, force the universe to create you within it? If all of that happens then how can free will even exist?
I don't believe a zygote gets a soul until the 4th week when the heart starts beating


She means fat percentage of total body weight. 17% is the upper edge of "athletic".

Melinda, how do you know your body fat percentage? Have you started going to a gym?
No, I do the pinch test.

I was an athlete growing up, into college, and hsve maintained that even as a mom cycling. I do the pinch test on my arms and inner thighs. So many inches correlates to a percentage, roughly speaking



@TamarYaelBatYah you know what else adds 15 pounds? All the food you stuff in your fat fucking face. Maybe if you gave some to your emaciated children you wouldn't be such a disgusting fat whore.
👆 👆 👆 narcissistic abuse tactic called "body shaming". I'm too mature to fall for that.

Psh. Tell that to my $1200/month grocery bill!! My children eat all day, every day, I'm running a full time kitchen around the clock. I wash 2 sink fulls of dishes every day.

Elohim made men and women in all shapes in sizes. He happened to make me thick and I am happy just the way he made me: STRONG!

"Her arms are strong for her tasks..." (Proverbs 31:17)

As a breastfeeding woman I also get the privilege of eating whatever I want, whenever I want because it all turns into wholesome breastmilk for my 15 month old. Except that I only eat a dessert once a week on Shabbat.

15 months and going strong and I'm breastfeeding ecologically so well that I'm still not ovulating nor pregnant. You have to keep extra weight to breastfeed that well. I know you saw my big boobs, don't lie!
 
But how can there be a situation where you know how to do something that no one else is able to duplicate? It sounds like you're talking about something like massage therapy.
I don't mean filling a gap that nobody else thought about filling. I mean a gap that people thought about filling, puked at the thought and went to cry themselves to sleep.
Work with death, with trash, with sewage - you'll discover demand for this kind of professionals is much higher than supply will ever be.

Even outside of jobs and money there is always competition though. Competition for mates, competition for life, bidding on buying a home or anything like that. Competition for clean water and other resources, for scholarships and university placements, for everything. When you get sick your body is at war with a hostile, invasive bacteria or virus.
You can surely see it this way, but it's a matter of perception. For me it's not a competition, it's a process, either solitary or aided by others when we work towards a common goal. Competition would imply trying to actively impede your rivals and that's something I avoid - both seeing people as rivals and impeding others in their pursuit of their goals.

Incorrect. Elohim is a socialist. The land of Israel was given to all Israelites FOR FREE. The Torah commands socialism as well.
Socialism is not about free stuff, it's much more complex. The main problem with this idealized version of socialism is: when you reward everybody equally for their contributions, few people would choose difficult professions with a lot personal responsibility, like doctors or engineers.

If you distinguish what you stand for, those who stand for the same values and beliefs will always stand with you.
It's more about being less hostile towards people who stand for other things, or for nothing at all.

I don't believe a zygote gets a soul until the 4th week when the heart starts beating
Heart is just a muscle. If you want to take biological approach, make it the nervous system - that's where one's "self" resides.
Also, isn't Jewish definition of soul "the body and the spirit that inhabits it", opposed to Christian "spirit"? Like in SOS - Save our Souls - means get our asses out of trouble, not pray for us.
 
Last edited:
narcissistic abuse tactic called "body shaming". I'm too mature to fall for that.
Not everything has its roots in narcissism you fucking retard. I'm being a dick because I hate you.


I don't know what a window-licker is. Never heard that before.
Calling Marshall a window licker is an insult to window lickers. There are sea sponges that are smarter than Marshall.


I know you saw my big boobs, don't lie!
Your mammary glands don't impress me.
 
You have to keep extra weight to breastfeed that well. I know you saw my big boobs, don't lie!
@Baby Yoda will be terribly disappointed you show such sights to @Deadpool rather than him.

Your mammary glands don't impress me.
@TamarYaelBatYah
Oh-oo-oh, you think you're special
Oh-oo-oh, you think you're something else
Okay, so you have big boobs

That don't impress me much
So you got the breast, but have you got the touch
Now don't get me wrong, I don't think you're alright
But that won't keep me shitposting in the middle of the night
That don't impress me much
Ah-huh, yeah yeah

 
Competition would imply trying to actively impede your rivals and that's something I avoid - both seeing people as rivals and impeding others in their pursuit of their goals.
I see we have different definitions of competition. I don't try to impede rivals or create enemies, to me it's about who can do it better and always improving. If you need to try to sabotage someone else to win, you're already the weaker side.
 
If you need to try to sabotage someone else to win, you're already the weaker side.
I don't mean it in the way of cheating in a competition. I mean taking something somebody wants and possibly needs more than I do. What if they don't know the rules as well as I do? What if I was born with an advantage of sorts? What stops me from taking more than I need, leaving only scraps for others (other than my flawed judgement)? I prefer situations with no losers if I have a choice.
 
If you need to try to sabotage someone else to win, you're already the weaker side.
Come again? Could you say that louder so all your KF Scapegoats here can hear you?

One has to wonder if that is an epiphany or hypocrisy!!




Socialism is not about free stuff, it's much more complex. The main problem with this idealized version of socialism is: when you reward everybody equally for their contributions, few people would choose difficult professions with a lot personal responsibility, like doctors or engineers.

I have to disagree here. Socialism is about the distribution of resources based solely on the merit one's status as a citizen. It's a free gift of resources based on moral principle, not saying one man's sweat is more valuable than another man's sweat.

I also disagree that the fair distribution of resources results in people not working. Deep within most people is a passion for something. So much so that there are people who will actually pursue their passion no matter what. Even in Capitalism this manifests as "volunteer", "starving artist", "budding [insert profession here]", "hobby business" or "retirement" (pursuing passions without thought of money). Most people have a need to work with their hands, create and produce something. Socialism results in more people pursuing their passions.

Redistribution of resources to fuel a renaissance of small business owners is better for society. Imagine doing business with people who actually want to be working doing what they love rather than asshole employees at major chains who give you shitty customer service because they don't really want to be there.

Imagine every woman being able to breastfeed because she owns a small business that doesn't separate her from her baby. Imagine every father being available during the day to raise his children because he owns a small business that doesn't take him away from his children during the day. Corporate Capitalism can't give that to people.


According to Who?
Me. And that counts because I have an inherent right to speak for myself.


That then means that he wishes for all his chosen people to die of starvation. Seems like you should switch to satanism, he (Satan) actually likes his children.

Even before Adam and Chavah sinned, Elohim told Adam from the very beginning to till the earth for food.

It's often taught that tilling the earth was the punishment, but the punishment was actually "thistles and thorns"/a cursed ground that is harder to grow things from.

But either way, Elohim never put a dollar sign or price tag on food.
 
Come again? Could you say that louder so all your KF Scapegoats here can hear you?
Nobody is sabotaging you.
I also disagree that the fair distribution of resources results in people not working
Disagree all you want, I showed you data showing that you are wrong. Socialistic policies cause massive problems, including unemployment and inflation.
But either way, Elohim never put a dollar sign or price tag on food.
If he encourages socialism/communism, he encourages mass starvation. 80% of all people who had starved to death in Mao's China, and USSR.
 

Attachments

Nobody is sabotaging you.

👆 👆 👆 gaslighting



Disagree all you want, I showed you data showing that you are wrong. Socialistic policies cause massive problems, including unemployment and inflation.

Data from who? Capitalists?

There's plenty of people in socialistic countries doing well and even better than capitalist countries. The average household income in the US is around $45k. In Saudi Arabia it's around $95 because they give all their citizens a share of the oil wealth. They redistribute the wealth.

There's people in the US who can't even afford a car even though they work 40 hours a week. Capitalism clearly does not serve the interests of everyone in a society.

If he encourages socialism/communism, he encourages mass starvation. 80% of all people who had starved to death in Mao's China, and USSR.

Both of those leaders didn't properly distribute resources then. It was failure to implement properly.

There's no reason governments can't redistribute land so that every American has the opportunity to be a homeowner with land OR community gardens in cities become the right of every citizen so that food is in the control of the people.

There's no reason governments can't redistribute land so that every American has the opportunity to be a homeowner with land OR community gardens in cities become the right of every citizen so that food is in the control of the people.

Bill Gates currently owns 300,000 acres of farm land. Why does any one person need to own 300,000 acres while other people in the US don't even have access to organic food?
 
Both of those leaders didn't properly distribute resources then. It was failure to implement properly.

There's no reason governments can't redistribute land so that every American has the opportunity to be a homeowner with land OR community gardens in cities become the right of every citizen so that food is in the control of the people.
On the contrary, they distributed resources to themselves, their family and friends quite efficiently.

There is a reason that governments can't redistribute land the way you're suggesting - to benefit the masses rather than the few. The reason is that governments are made out of a few people, and when you give people that much power, they won't.
 
In Saudi Arabia it's around $95 because they give all their citizens a share of the oil wealth. They redistribute the wealth.
This source says different,

In Qatar, the average per capita income is $129,700 a year; in Saudi Arabia, it is $54,100.



I read the $95k statistic a few years ago. But the point is the same: the redistribution of wealth benefits the masses in other countries. And Saudi Arabia's socialistic programs bring the average per household just as high as the US



And that was before COVID-19 hit
 
This source says different,

In Qatar, the average per capita income is $129,700 a year; in Saudi Arabia, it is $54,100.



I read the $95k statistic a few years ago. But the point is the same: the redistribution of wealth benefits the masses in other countries. And Saudi Arabia's socialistic programs bring the average per household just as high as the US


And that was before COVID-19 hit

Canada likes to print articles that the average person makes $39k a year which simply isn't true. The information always comes from banks who want more people to go to said bank and put up an account.

Also, guess why Saudi Araba can give so much money away? Oil fields! It's also to shut the people up when their government does something that pisses off the people and rest of the world, like kill journalists. Not that I expect you to actually read up on what goes on there. The country only just recently let women drive.

Also, also if you read the article you posted. Only state workers and pensioners got money and it was $266 a month. It was also to help said people with the increase in their taxes at the time and the fact their gasoline doubled. (They have to worry about VAT which is now 15%). They also pay 12% of their earnings in social insurance taxes. They also expected to help with buying a home there, which is another tax there (5% total). Essentially that money would be given back to the government with extra. Instead of reading the title of an article, read the whole thing next time.

Should also mention that Saudi Arabia is having to worry about their huge debt. Currently sitting at $182.72 billion usd and expected to rise. Not all countries get a free pass like the USA does when it comes to borrowing money from the World Bank.

Bill Gates currently owns 300,000 acres of farm land. Why does any one person need to own 300,000 acres while other people in the US don't even have access to organic food?
It's 242,000. You fudge numbers as bad as Richard does.
 
👆 👆 👆 gaslighting
No, Mel, it's just facts.
Data from who? Capitalists?
Are you alleging a massive world wide conspiracy to fake all the data around socialism?
There's plenty of people in socialistic countries doing well and even better than capitalist countries.
Screenshot 2021-06-19 190522.png
Looks like Venezuela is doing pretty good.
What about USSR on it's final year?
1991.png
Hmm....Well, surely socialism and communism didn't have a huge lasting effects, did they?
1992.png
How did US do at that time?
Screenshot 2021-06-19 191540.png
Oh.

What about outside of Russia? From 53.4% monthly inflation to 41.9 quadrillion monthly inflation in all the lands socialism touched.

Well, surely some other socialists did better, right?
Screenshot 2021-06-19 192202.png

Oh.

Well, maybe china? Surely people there can at least eat? Wait, what? Nearly half of them can't afford to eat?, and those that do have to give up everything else to afford food? But wasn't socialism supposed to magically make everything good?
There's plenty of people in socialistic countries
I'd ask you to list some, but there's only 5 socialistic countries in the world, and one of them is actually half capitalist (hint, all of those socialist states are doing horribly)
The average household income in the US is around $45k. In Saudi Arabia it's around $95 because they give all their citizens a share of the oil wealth. They redistribute the wealth.
Congrats. You just showed why Saudi Arabia is shit. People are on average (according to your data) poorer than in US. Also, they aren't socialists, they are monarchists. Capitalist Monarchs.
There's people in the US who can't even afford a car even though they work 40 hours a week.
Cool. People in USSR couldn't afford cars in their entire lives. Most People in Socialistic Vietnam can't afford cars because they are much much more expensive than in US, largely due to massive taxes imposed by the gov. Manufacturers pay 11691.08 usd in taxes per a single car made, and that's the cheapest variant. To put it in perspective, to make a cheap car, they pay nearly as much in taxes as it costs to buy 2020 Chevrolet Spark LS in US
Both of those leaders didn't properly distribute resources then. It was failure to implement properly.
There has never been a successful implementation of socialism or communism, because it's impossible. We've seen it time and time again.
There's no reason governments can't redistribute land so that every American has the opportunity to be a homeowner with land OR community gardens in cities become the right of every citizen so that food is in the control of the people.
You have the opportunity to be a homeowner. Work for it.
US don't even have access to organic food?
I wonder if she knows about these weird new things called stores. All the rage, I hear.
Bill Gates currently owns 300,000 acres of farm land. Why does any one person need to own 300,000 acres
Because he earned it. and wants to have it. Why should you get his stuff for free?
There is a reason that governments can't redistribute land the way you're suggesting - to benefit the masses rather than the few. The reason is that governments are made out of a few people, and when you give people that much power, they won't.
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton
In US it's 65,297.5 USD.
And that was before COVID-19 hit
So is my statistic
 
Last edited:
Back