Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
More Bob sperging about the darn dirty Catholics.

Bob Catholics.png


No one tell Bob that political groups are also largely tax exempt in America.
 
It's astounding to see Mark Shea and James Martin attempt to retcon every globohomo pet project as Catholic Social Teaching
The error these people make is;
• Catholic social teaching opposes unregulated capitalism (true)
• the progressive left opposes unregulated capitalism (true, but for different reasons)
• it is therefore licit, Catholic Social Teaching™, and Ignatian Spirituality™ to hold anti-Catholic stances on social issues because the people who hold them have opinions in line with Catholic social teaching on other issues (go to heresy, do not pass go, do not collect £200, go directly to heresy)
to the point of simping for people who are actively hostile to Christianity.
This reminds me of the ”AOC is the future of the Catholic Church” article in America. Do these people not understand that young people are far more likely to be trads than any other generation since Vatican II or what the words ”non praevalebunt” mean?
1) laymen do not have the ability to absolve sins.
Robert Chipman is, as always, the best case in point for why the Church needs to properly catechise young people.
2) this would be authoritarian in any case, but it would make some form of sense if a group of Prods had kicked Biden out. As it is it makes as much sense as declaring that the Green New Deal will stop cows farting in Kazakhstan or whatever - that is to say, it addresses something outside the jurisdiction of Congress with a Congressional solution. The head of the Catholic Church is the Pope. The Pope and the Church's treasury are in the Vatican, and receive money from the Catholic Church across the world. The Vatican is its own country.

How do you propose to tax an independent country, Moviebob?
 
Last edited:
The error these people make is;
• Catholic social teaching opposes unregulated capitalism (true)
• the progressive left opposes unregulated capitalism (true, but for different reasons)
• it is therefore licit, Catholic Social Teaching™, and Ignatian Spirituality™ to hold anti-Catholic stances on social issues because the people who hold them have opinions in line with Catholic social teaching on other issues (go to heresy, do not pass go, do not collect £200, go directly to heresy)

This reminds me of the ”AOC is the future of the Catholic Church” article in America. Do these people not understand that young people are far more likely to be trads than any other generation since Vatican II or what the words ”non praevalebunt” mean?

1) laymen do not have the ability to absolve sins.
Robert Chipman is, as always, the best case in point for why the Church needs to properly catechise young people.
2) this would be authoritarian in any case, but it would make some form of sense if a group of Prods had kicked Biden out. As it is it makes as much sense as declaring that the Green New Deal will stop cows farting in Kazakhstan or whatever - that is to say, it addresses something outside the jurisdiction of Congress with a Congressional solution. The head of the Catholic Church is the Pope. The Pope and the Church's treasury are in the Vatican, and receive money from the Catholic Church across the world. The Vatican is its own country.

How do you propose to tax an independent country, Moviebob?
As hard as I find it to imagine that Bob doesn't know that the Catholic Church in the Vatican isn't taxable due to being its own fucking country, I'm pretty sure he's just being really stupid and thinking that the global Catholic Church in any country acts like a Corporation, which of course is taxed, and therefore he thinks Uncle Sam deserves a cut of what goes into the offering plate every Sunday.
 
As hard as I find it to imagine that Bob doesn't know that the Catholic Church in the Vatican isn't taxable due to being its own fucking country, I'm pretty sure he's just being really stupid and thinking that the global Catholic Church in any country acts like a Corporation, which of course is taxed, and therefore he thinks Uncle Sam deserves a cut of what goes into the offering plate every Sunday.
Bob is actually correct here. The Catholic Church, like any church or religious denomination in most the West, are exempt from most if not all taxes, nominally because they are regarded as charities(albeit they de facto don't have to spent a single cent for any of cause, corruption within it is not uncommon, and he covered his ass there saying that religious charities proper should be exempt).
That said, my observations is that evangelical groups are by far more abusive than anything the Catholic Church have done since the pornocracy(or maybe pre-19th century).
 
It's astounding to see Mark Shea and James Martin attempt to retcon every globohomo pet project as Catholic Social Teaching™️, to the point of simping for people who are actively hostile to Christianity. It's the upshot of interpreting "love thy neighbor and turn the other cheek" as "be a doormat and and a passive enabler of evil".
I'm really debating whether I should show you his twitter... lol

 
Bob is actually correct here. The Catholic Church, like any church or religious denomination in most the West, are exempt from most if not all taxes, nominally because they are regarded as charities(albeit they de facto don't have to spent a single cent for any of cause, corruption within it is not uncommon, and he covered his ass there saying that religious charities proper should be exempt).
That said, my observations is that evangelical groups are by far more abusive than anything the Catholic Church have done since the pornocracy(or maybe pre-19th century).
To be fair, it would probably be WAY easier to list charities, religious or not, that are not corrupt...if any non-corrupt charities existed which seems pretty hard to believe in this day and age.
 
It's astounding to see Mark Shea and James Martin attempt to retcon every globohomo pet project as Catholic Social Teaching™️, to the point of simping for people who are actively hostile to Christianity. It's the upshot of interpreting "love thy neighbor and turn the other cheek" as "be a doormat and and a passive enabler of evil".

I hate the ”seamless garment” argument with a passion because it implies several absurd things, namely;
• killing an innocent baby or an innocent grandmother is morally equivalent to killing a mass murderer,
• St Thomas Aquinas, as well as pretty much every Pope before Francis, were wrong when they declared the death penalty to be legitimate,
• St Augustine of Hippo was wrong when he proposed just war theory,
• the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and Pope Benedict XVI (then Cardinal Ratzinger) were wrong when they said that abortion and capital punishment were not comparable, and thus that,
• Pope Francis' non-dogmatic statements in Fratelli Tutti concerning the death penalty and war magically overrule two thousand years of Sacred Tradition.
• Pope Benedict XVI's statement that it is not licit for a Catholic to disagree with the Holy Father on abortion doesn't actually count.
• a position which is supported by Fr James Martin, SJ and generally speaking has no supporters outside of the progressivist wing of the Church has more claim to be based in Tradition than a position held by the Church for over a thousand years.
 

Attachments

  • EwPCALPW8AUeLJB.jpeg
    EwPCALPW8AUeLJB.jpeg
    41.4 KB · Views: 166
More Bob sperging about the darn dirty Catholics.

View attachment 2277152

No one tell Bob that political groups are also largely tax exempt in America.
Is he also aware that charities like Stonewall have significant political influence? Should they be stripped of charity status, Bob? How about whatever non-profit grift Saint Anita Sarkeesian is currently running?

Let me guess: They're all okay because they're championing the 'right' politics, not Right politics.
How much you all wanna bet he has the Avengers theme as his rington?
View attachment 2277436
I fucking doubt it Bob, since the Avengers theme sucks shit and only has a single memorable bar in the entire piece, and which I repeatedly confuse with the infinitely superior theme from Uncharted.
 
Is he also aware that charities like Stonewall have significant political influence? Should they be stripped of charity status, Bob? How about whatever non-profit grift Saint Anita Sarkeesian is currently running?
He's also not aware that many black Protestant churches are incredibly pro-Democrat, to the point where one Dem senator is a Baptist pastor and black churches routinely hold voter registration drives and strongly encourage their parishioners to vote blue.
 
However, Leyendecker wasn't the first guy to come around using these hyper masculine figures for the male ideal, as lot of his contemporanies were doing the same thing, like Dean Cornwell (who wasn't gay BTW).
The type of argument made by Bobby should not be taken seriously:
"As a gay man, artist X sees the male physique as a lived phenomenon, which accounts for the unsettled tension between poetics and politics in his works."
"As a gay man, artist X maintains a cool, disinterested conception towards the female body, which allows him to capture the purity of its aesthetics"
"As a straight man, artist Y imbues his female nudes with a fervent passion."
"As a straight man, artist Y is able to abstract the formal possibility of the male nude, seeing the similarity between the male physique and a mountain range."

All these statements, common in art books and exhibitions, are laughably post-hoc and should be ridiculed.

Regardless, no matter which way you swing, I doubt you can esthetize this lily pond:
202170749_10157669305585793_7830021901431931359_n.jpg

203523882_10157669300935793_6414061147260277519_n.jpg

202530762_10157669300865793_2287252322744115975_n.jpg
I almost though the ones sitting on the ground are Chris's kids. They are not.

202507848_10157669305645793_5098110711471540244_n.jpg
We saw these people before. Someone might care to spare my work and dig out their old group photo.

4436.png
 
Last edited:
The type of argument made by Bobby should not be taken seriously
"As a gay man, artist X sees the male physique as a lived phenomenon, which accounts for the unsettled tension between poetics and politics in his works."
"As a gay man, artist X has a disinterested conception of the female body, which allows him to capture the purity of its aesthetics"
"As a straight man, artist Y imbues his female nudes with a fervent passion."
"As a straight man, artist Y is able to abstract the formal possibility of the male nude, seeing the similarity between the male physique and a mountain range."

All these statements, common in art books and exhibitions, are terribly post-hoc and should be ridiculed.

Regardless, no matter which way you swing, I doubt you can esthetize these:
View attachment 2278767

View attachment 2278770

View attachment 2278765
I almost though the ones sitting on the ground are Chris's kids. They are not.

View attachment 2278771

View attachment 2278776
Speaking of aesthetics, there's something profoundly unsettling about how Chris takes photos; most of the time it looks like he isn't actually there or at least isn't a part of whatever's going on.

They remind me of the shoops people used to do of thumb man where they'd put him in front of photos of various atrocities. Sadly it seems any examples have been lost to time.
 
Speaking of aesthetics, there's something profoundly unsettling about how Chris takes photos; most of the time it looks like he isn't actually there or at least isn't a part of whatever's going on.

I was just going to say -- he looks photoshopped in, especially that one where it's just his swollen head down in the corner.

On the other hand, I totally believe this is him: the toad and his pond!

1624193574093.png
 
I fucking doubt it Bob, since the Avengers theme sucks shit and only has a single memorable bar in the entire piece, and which I repeatedly confuse with the infinitely superior theme from Uncharted.
The Uncharted theme kicks ass. Every time I boot up one of the original trilogy (fuck the Cuckmann one, it's just shit) I just sit and listen to it for a bit.

Back to the topic at hand, Bob surely just has the Mario theme as his ringtone. It is his first, last, and the only love he'll ever truly have.
I was just going to say -- he looks photoshopped in, especially that one where it's just his swollen head down in the corner.

On the other hand, I totally believe this is him: the toad and his pond!

View attachment 2278848
He has some unsettling affiliation with that pond for sure. The look on that face is concealing some kind of horror.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back