We keep getting different numbers; at one point there were 200, I think it was quoted as 170 after the winter, someone in-thread claimed there was a shearing headcount as low as 127 (though I don't recall seeing that number from the ranch itself), who even knows at this point. We do know the ranch has talked about losing alpaca, and said casually enough that it suggests it's not an uncommon thing. Who knows, really, until they give a helpful solid number again.
Okay let me redig on this. I have NOT watched all the videos or listened to all the podcasts yet to autistically place together every word. But the 9 News media does say 180 alpaca. The most damning evidence would be the ranchers own words for exact numbers.
Thanks you beautiful autistic, I knew someone would have the hard numbers. The 130-150 seems reasonable as a guess, when extrapolating from their '127 sheared by day 2 (of how many total, idk)' and considering that they wouldn't have shaved crias, pregnant alpaca, maybe the random vicuña based on what the shearer told them, and probably a handful of others for various reasons.
If you can use the duck to open a bottle of wine, it's male.
I genuinely feel bad for those poor animals. Death from gross mismanagement and inadequate feeding can be a very prolonged and torturous one. At least animals in industrial farms live short lives, but those unfortunate ones will suffer for years. Also, I watched some of the videos above, and damn those troons are so fucking ugly. The black-haired one especially looks abhorrent. Those "individuals" must have constructed a fantastical world in their rotten brains to be so convinced of the delusions that they are engaged to. I mean, I have seen lots of trannies that at least try to "pass", but they have done literally no effort to back their claims.
I am not a lawyer, nor do I play one on Reddit, and I know nothing about this potential suit, but I'm going to bet my house they don't have a case.
Is he about to learn about section 230? Who else but those KiwiFarms chuds have spoken ill of the Tranch? That conservative newspaper that dared to accurately describe them like a year ago?
Both he and Penny are so man-fingered when they post. I can't even tell if this is supposed to say 'liability' or 'libel'.
People have been talking about them within the community. There could conceivably be some sort of defamation that caused damage to either the Tranch or their ability to get work within the community. Given Paul's inability to even spell libel let alone understand what it means, there could even be a tortious interference if they believe a specific contract was violated. We have seen a recent uptick in them working externally given the less than enthusiastic response to the latest GFM. Them having some unknown actionable tort is the most optimistic take someone can give, but it is not inconceivable.
They couldn't possibly mean us? We are all good boys here.
These are worse than Pretty Marines.
