Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

[Willie Thrills]

Trump was against shutting borders, claiming the Chinese President was wonderful and had everything under control for weeks.

World War Z is a work of fiction about zombies, how is it relevant to COVID?

Because it shows that China's habits regarding secrecy and espionage were known for decades beforehand, publicly, and any attempt to diminish that is done by lying. China obviously lied and it had a significant impact - anybody who believe China, anybody in any position of power, showed gross incompetence to the level that they should be in the Hague.

Likewise, the author already showed a strong knowledge of what was, then, a Japanese phenomenon - internet culture and rumours centered around what is now analogous to 4chan's /pol/ board. There's obviously something missing here - either your leaders betrayed you, or are so thoroughly incompetent that they need to be removed from leadership immediately lest they accidentally press the wrong button and kill you by accident.

If a random American zombie writer can accurately determine the national response of a country and the public response, but your fucking leaders can't, you need new leaders.

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

He was still outright saying that he trusted Xi and the Chinese had it under control. Right before it hit and there were only a few diagnosed cases he was saying "It will go away."

Anyone saying that Trump knew better is either stupid or in denial.

 

[Willie Thrills]

He was still outright saying that he trusted Xi and the Chinese had it under control. Right before it hit and there were only a few diagnosed cases he was saying "It will go away."

Anyone saying that Trump knew better is either stupid or in denial.

No shit, they're all fucked and Trump is only slightly less unbearable than the rest. Pretending he is worth supporting over anybody more suited is what makes for TES, whereas pretending he is any less suited than the pathetic excuse for governance across the entire Western world is TDS.

 

[FuckingDogs4Living]

No shit, they're all fucked and Trump is only slightly less unbearable than the rest. Pretending he is worth supporting over anybody more suited is what makes for TES, whereas pretending he is any less suited than the pathetic excuse for governance across the entire Western world is TDS.

That’s a hell of a retarded take, bro. Trump is by far the most incompetent person to become president in the last 100 years. And he is much more incompetent than people like Macron, von der Leyer or pretty much any other G7 leader.

BoJo might pretend to be a retard, but Trump actually is one.

 

[Willie Thrills]

That’s a hell of a retarded take, bro. Trump is by far the most incompetent person to become president in the last 100 years. And he is much more incompetent than people like Macron, von der Leyer or pretty much any other G7 leader.

BoJo might pretend to be a retard, but Trump actually is one.

What the fuck?

I mean, in the most specific possible way, describe what you like about the other G7 leaders and their policies. Is it the mass immigration? The intense focus on spying on their own citizenry? The disgusting secrets and hypocrisy, the fact they need more security than the average dictator to even walk among their own citizens? Which part of Macron's policies do you prefer over Trump's? The fact he has his own military openly calling him a traitor - the disgusting behaviour at his palaces? Or is it the dumping of illegal immigrants on the UK?

Speaking of UK, which parts of those policies do you enjoy so much compared to Trump - the hate speech laws which imprison autists yet allow Islamists free, the brazen police corruption in several major cities which has gone largely ignored, the constant failures of public health, the repeated promises to reduce immigration and increasing it massively, arresting people for wearing masks only to later make it law - actually let's bring up one by the current government and ask - what about the lawlessness of the immigration policy while targeting certain minorities with laws which allow them to be made homeless at the whim of a police officer - how about the enormous tax rates in the UK which are openly ignored by major internet companies in a way that is fully permitted and encouraged by the state - should I go on or will you just say "lol Trump bad" and act as if every other country is a paradise.

Trump is not particularly inclined in either direction, I haven't seen shit to make him seem like any more incompetent than the people who gave thousands of people AIDS "by accident" while knowing the risk of using AIDS-Blood and deliberately ignored all procedures related to it.

He's just a slightly goofier President who accurately represents the international image of the USA - a large, very impolite man who has a lot of money and doesn't particularly care for the aristocratic image.

 

[JaneThough]

What I love about this is there are zero actionable steps. Especially the first few. It basis saying “sit back and watch it happen. We’re not sure how, why or when it’ll happen but it will!”

 

[Doctor of Autism]

What I love about this is there are zero actionable steps. Especially the first few. It basis saying “sit back and watch it happen. We’re not sure how, why or when it’ll happen but it will!”

Yep and I bet whoever wrote that thinks they’re extra smart for referencing the Achilles Heel. What is it with Trumpfags and referencing ancient history that makes them think it will make them look smart?

 

[JaneThough]

What the fuck?

I mean, in the most specific possible way, describe what you like about the other G7 leaders and their policies. Is it the mass immigration? The intense focus on spying on their own citizenry? The disgusting secrets and hypocrisy, the fact they need more security than the average dictator to even walk among their own citizens? Which part of Macron's policies do you prefer over Trump's? The fact he has his own military openly calling him a traitor - the disgusting behaviour at his palaces? Or is it the dumping of illegal immigrants on the UK?

Speaking of UK, which parts of those policies do you enjoy so much compared to Trump - the hate speech laws which imprison autists yet allow Islamists free, the brazen police corruption in several major cities which has gone largely ignored, the constant failures of public health, the repeated promises to reduce immigration and increasing it massively, arresting people for wearing masks only to later make it law - actually let's bring up one by the current government and ask - what about the lawlessness of the immigration policy while targeting certain minorities with laws which allow them to be made homeless at the whim of a police officer - how about the enormous tax rates in the UK which are openly ignored by major internet companies in a way that is fully permitted and encouraged by the state - should I go on or will you just say "lol Trump bad" and act as if every other country is a paradise.

Trump is not particularly inclined in either direction, I haven't seen shit to make him seem like any more incompetent than the people who gave thousands of people AIDS "by accident" while knowing the risk of using AIDS-Blood and deliberately ignored all procedures related to it.

He's just a slightly goofier President who accurately represents the international image of the USA - a large, very impolite man who has a lot of money and doesn't particularly care for the aristocratic image.

Oh Trump cares about the aristocratic image. He desperately wants to be in it. He wants to be seen as part of it. Hence him trying to set up his own “dynasty”

 

[Willie Thrills]

Oh Trump cares about the aristocratic image. He desperately wants to be in it. He wants to be seen as part of it. Hence him trying to set up his own “dynasty”

It's obvious that you have never seen the lengths real aristrocrats go to for their image. Call me back when he makes them speak Latin and wear silly dresses, or hold high military ranks by default.

 

[Steamboat_Bill]

Oh Trump cares about the aristocratic image. He desperately wants to be in it. He wants to be seen as part of it. Hence him trying to set up his own “dynasty”

Trump's as bourgeois and rich as it gets. Who thinks a man who owns a gold toilet gives a damn about the working class?

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Yep and I bet whoever wrote that thinks they’re extra smart for referencing the Achilles Heel. What is it with Trumpfags and referencing ancient history that makes them think it will make them look smart?

A lot of them have a massive hardon for Ancient Greece and Rome. I suspect it's because of things like Spartans and the Roman Legions looking really cool and being strong and tough and yadda yadda. I'm sure they'd say it's because of the Ancient Greek tradition of Democracy, but they actually fucking despise Democracy when it doesn't go their way, much like many on the left

 

[Willie Thrills]

Trump's as bourgeois and rich as it gets. Who thinks a man who owns a gold toilet gives a damn about the working class?

Again, Aristocratic is a cultural description, it's an actual tangible reality in Europe which doesn't exist to anywhere near the same extent in the USA. These are different things, America doesn't have an enormous class of ancient families which inherited enormous estates from their ancestors, American bourgeois (and most of the colonised world) don't have this because of how land was distributed and valued at the time of colonisation. The closest thing America had were the 19th century Confederate estates, who purposely behaved like Aristrocrats.

Edit: I actually decided to look it up, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_gentry

America had gentry but because of the nature of the USA at the time, they failed and no longer hold any significant stature in the USA. Trump is not an Aristocrat nor is he part of the early American gentry class, Trump is better described by the term "Nouveau Riche" and this is precisely what wealthy Americans are.

This isn't even a minor detail, Nouveau Riche are extremely popular in the USA and you are one of the few cultures who actually celebrate this sort of subculture. This is why America is unique compared to most other colonial states. I bet you're all the sorts of fags who wish you were the ones getting sodomised by ritual like an actual Aristocrat.

 

[FuckingDogs4Living]

What the fuck?

I mean, in the most specific possible way, describe what you like about the other G7 leaders and their policies. Is it the mass immigration? The intense focus on spying on their own citizenry? The disgusting secrets and hypocrisy, the fact they need more security than the average dictator to even walk among their own citizens? Which part of Macron's policies do you prefer over Trump's? The fact he has his own military openly calling him a traitor - the disgusting behaviour at his palaces? Or is it the dumping of illegal immigrants on the UK?

Speaking of UK, which parts of those policies do you enjoy so much compared to Trump - the hate speech laws which imprison autists yet allow Islamists free, the brazen police corruption in several major cities which has gone largely ignored, the constant failures of public health, the repeated promises to reduce immigration and increasing it massively, arresting people for wearing masks only to later make it law - actually let's bring up one by the current government and ask - what about the lawlessness of the immigration policy while targeting certain minorities with laws which allow them to be made homeless at the whim of a police officer - how about the enormous tax rates in the UK which are openly ignored by major internet companies in a way that is fully permitted and encouraged by the state - should I go on or will you just say "lol Trump bad" and act as if every other country is a paradise.

Trump is not particularly inclined in either direction, I haven't seen shit to make him seem like any more incompetent than the people who gave thousands of people AIDS "by accident" while knowing the risk of using AIDS-Blood and deliberately ignored all procedures related to it.

He's just a slightly goofier President who accurately represents the international image of the USA - a large, very impolite man who has a lot of money and doesn't particularly care for the aristocratic image.

Jeez, I didn’t expect you to sperg out so much. I, personally, quite enjoy Macron’s strong Eurocentric vision and his goal to assemble a european army. He is also not to blame for refugee crisis, in fact the refugee flow has decreased under his watch, compared to Hollande. I also would not take “the military’s” views seriously, it’s simply a publicity stunt. It is also funny how you speak of mass surveillance btw, considering the whole NSA stuff Snowden uncovered.

You also seem to conflate BoJo and Trump as UK vs US. BoJo, despite hiccups recently, has managed to win a landslide electoral victory, destroying Corbyn as a political entity and forcing Labour to return to Blair-style politicians. He also has a clue or two of how to work the Parliament and has actual goals he’s trying to achieve.

Do you really want to compare police brutality/corruption in the US to UK?

You are a moron, bro. Trump has failed, politically, every time he tried to achieve something. Wall? Failure. Foreign Policy? Failure. Jobs? Failure. Infrastructure? Failure. Immigration halt? Failure. COVID containment? Failure. Re-election? Utter, miserable failure.

 

[Ima Spedonym2]

What's the next level for a Community Watch thread beyond "Plagued"?

 

[Willie Thrills]

Do you really want to compare police brutality/corruption in the US to UK?

I'm Catholic, so yes, let's - when are the US police going to atleast embrace their image and start shooting? The RUC did a hell of a lot worse for a hell of a lot less. I am sorely disappointed, but you seem like a complete sped so I'll boil it down - you won't see actual police corruption on public media. Ever. That's kind of the point, the first thing to go is propaganda - most Brits are completely unaware of the Military Reaction Force, for example, or perhaps more recently and in the mainland UK, the Rotherham rape gang and the thirty or so similar cases. Did you ever notice how there's an awful lot of police officers involved in these rape gangs - like the first ever Paki Armed Response officer who was done for raping a heroin-spiked thirteen year old white girl?

Remember that case - the first ever armed Paki copper got done for raping a white girl and it magically wasn't on the front page of the BBC. Who'da thunk it.

He was even the inside man of a rape gang - and here he is lecturing the public on how to engage with Pakis - https://feweek.co.uk/2017/06/11/pan...tatives-encourage-diversity-in-the-workforce/

If it was true, you wouldn't get to see it. It'd be down the memory hole, like most of the state's actions in Northern Ireland, confined to the communities it affected directly. That's why you have people bitching that some nog died in police custody - despite the gigantic, Ulster-shaped elephant in the room. Remember that time the government dressed up as terrorists and massacred atleast fifteen civilians in order to divert other terrorists away from killing police officers? Do you remember that from school?

Above all else, this is the one thing mongs like yourself should already know. You won't see anything on mainstream TV, or Instagram, or Twitter, without somebody deliberately airing it. Usually the people involved are far more well-paid and far more professional than you - this isn't some petty office job, these are workplaces with massive amounts of security. Everything you are likely to see, outside of the likes of KiwiFarms or some of the more obscure imageboards, is big business and they are very careful about what information is allowed on them. This is double, or even triple, true for TVs and newspapers, which need a large amount of capital and are subject to intense regulation and oftentimes direct state interference - in the BBC's case, they are directly run by the state.

 

[proteus4994]

What's the next level for a Community Watch thread beyond "Plagued"?

I think it basically speaks for itself when we more or less leave the TDS thread alone, but the TES thread has someone desperate to defend their hero every 5 pages.

 

[eternal dog mongler]

I think it basically speaks for itself when we more or less leave the TDS thread alone, but the TES thread has someone desperate to defend their hero every 5 pages.

I enjoy it. It's like a panel show. "send the nogs to tir na nog" wasn't somebody I was expecting though.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

I think it basically speaks for itself when we more or less leave the TDS thread alone, but the TES thread has someone desperate to defend their hero every 5 pages.

It’s even funnier how they come here to supposedly laugh at Trump supporting retards yet never post content beyond trying to white knight a billionaire

 

[FuckingDogs4Living]

I'm Catholic, so yes, let's - when are the US police going to atleast embrace their image and start shooting?

The US leads the developed world in police killings/brutality, do you want them to become even worse? And who gives a shit if you’re catholic?

The RUC did a hell of a lot worse for a hell of a lot less. I am sorely disappointed, but you seem like a complete sped so I'll boil it down - you won't see actual police corruption on public media. Ever. That's kind of the point, the first thing to go is propaganda - most Brits are completely unaware of the Military Reaction Force, for example, or perhaps more recently and in the mainland UK, the Rotherham rape gang and the thirty or so similar cases. Did you ever notice how there's an awful lot of police officers involved in these rape gangs - like the first ever Paki Armed Response officer who was done for raping a heroin-spiked thirteen year old white girl?
Remember that case - the first ever armed Paki copper got done for raping a white girl and it magically wasn't on the front page of the BBC. Who'da thunk it.

He was even the inside man of a rape gang - and here he is lecturing the public on how to engage with Pakis - https://feweek.co.uk/2017/06/11/pan...tatives-encourage-diversity-in-the-workforce/

If it was true, you wouldn't get to see it. It'd be down the memory hole, like most of the state's actions in Northern Ireland, confined to the communities it affected directly. That's why you have people bitching that some nog died in police custody - despite the gigantic, Ulster-shaped elephant in the room. Remember that time the government dressed up as terrorists and massacred atleast fifteen civilians in order to divert other terrorists away from killing police officers? Do you remember that from school?

Above all else, this is the one thing mongs like yourself should already know. You won't see anything on mainstream TV, or Instagram, or Twitter, without somebody deliberately airing it. Usually the people involved are far more well-paid and far more professional than you - this isn't some petty office job, these are workplaces with massive amounts of security. Everything you are likely to see, outside of the likes of KiwiFarms or some of the more obscure imageboards, is big business and they are very careful about what information is allowed on them. This is double, or even triple, true for TVs and newspapers, which need a large amount of capital and are subject to intense regulation and oftentimes direct state interference - in the BBC's case, they are directly run by the state.

Oh God, again with the “rape gangs”, find some new material you twat. If parents don’t care about their kids that much that they end up doing smack and hanging out with pakis, it’s the fault of the parents and maybe the kids, for being fucking moronic. Ethnic minorities are linked to crime, goodness gracious! Also in the news, the sky is blue.

Again, you seem to jump from one discussion to another, in a matter of seconds. I compared Macron and BoJo to Trump, you switched the conversation to US vs UK, then instead of addressing my response you proceeded to focus on something minor and tardrage about the horrible England and it’s coppers. Stick to one topic, you autistic freak.

 

[Willie Thrills]

The US leads the developed world in police killings/brutality, do you want them to become even worse? And who gives a shit if you’re catholic?

Oh God, again with the “rape gangs”, find some new material you twat. If parents don’t care about their kids that much that they end up doing smack and hanging out with pakis, it’s the fault of the parents and maybe the kids, for being fucking moronic. Ethnic minorities are linked to crime, goodness gracious! Also in the news, the sky is blue.

Again, you seem to jump from one discussion to another, in a matter of seconds. I compared Macron and BoJo to Trump, you switched the conversation to US vs UK, then instead of addressing my response you proceeded to focus on something minor and tardrage about the horrible England and it’s coppers. Stick to one topic, you autistic freak.

Little thing called "The Troubles" - don't be such a sped and ignore that for the majority of the last fifty years, it was the UK which lead the way in the West of shooting its own citizens. The shit the UK was up to would incite a revolution in the USA - and did incite a revolution in Northern Ireland, to the point where there are still atleast two large areas in the UK where the police are not welcome at all, directly because of their brutality. These areas are both in Northern Ireland, obviously. In Britain itself, the police are so corrupt that they literally rape kids and sell heroin - this isn't just an "Ethnic minority" thing if it includes senior police officers and is ignored by media. Why would I need new material - this is a serious allegation, not a myth, this is something which seriously happened - why would it need to be forgotten? This was, and remains, an enormous problem and is not going to be solved by additional parenting. Is there some additional hoop I need to jump through - find direct video evidence of senior police officers engaging in these acts, or will you just demand I collect physical samples? Would you rather the public forget about the literal thousands of Paki rapists who were allowed to continue their crimes because many of them ran local governments? At what point do you think that human trafficking cartels should be permitted?

I compared Trump to any other leader - none are particularly appealing. France is an even worse example, given their current situations with enormous armed cartels, quickly becoming the most crime-ridden area of the EU. Macron is a colossal failure - he has done absolutely nothing to quell France's massive escalation of criminal activity. The only reason you dislike Trump is because you had four years of being bombarded by news of Trump - and in your mong brain, you cannot differentiate between sources of information to the extent that you genuinely believe Britain is in a better position than the USA - you seem to genuinely believe that police brutality and corruption is an American problem and not a British one. Trump is a middle-ground, obnoxious and funny person. That's the extent of it - nothing more, nothing less. He failed at the very simple tasks he initially promised - as did every single other politician in the entire English-speaking world. This is despite us having to deal with extremely oppressive and intrusive laws, to the extent that if you're anywhere in the capital, your face is being consistently monitored by the police incase you may be wanted for a criminal offense.

This is in comparison to our own government, which shows a disgusting level of contempt for it's own citizens. Unlike the Americans, however, when it's your balls on the line you won't have the option of shooting back - our government went through great lengths to make sure of this. Pushing some weird fantasy of democratic values - "Ooh my Lord is better than thine Lord!" when you have eroded every right you have, and then smugly pretending that your government is better than the guys who still have access to firearms, is some real sort of pathetic which I can't even comprehend.