Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
And to add to that, Steve Trevor was pleading with Diana to let him go after he learned the truth about the Dream Stone. I won't say that Wonder Woman 1984 is a good movie, but I think I know what Patty Jenkins was trying to do with that story thread. However, she didn't consider the moral implications of bringing Steve back in another man's body. Come to think of it, what that even necessary? I assume that the stone had the power to warp reality and could have materialized him without having to steal someone else's body.

I saw secondary theme of people not knowing want they truly wanted. Steve's death in the original film didn't leave Diana with any sense of closure so she held a candle for him for sixty-six years hence it took the end of the world for her to confront and accept the truth of her loss. Similarly, I saw Maxwell Lord in a similar vein. He didn't his son to look at him as a loser and got caught up in his greed until he received that epiphany at the climax and realized that he wanted to be a better father.

Damn, I think Wonder Woman 1984 could have been a much better film with script revisions and more editing.
It was completely unnecessary, remember the part where multiple groups materialize nukes from thin air?
They just needed to give WW her own selfish desire to want and later sacrifice at the end, so Steve had to use someone else's body.
 
Not having seen the movie because lolMCU, all I really have to work with is Drinker's review because I haven't watched anyone else's (but I'm pretty sure other reviewers I follow will give similar takes):

I do find it hilarious how Bob's simping for this movie when by all but the most dickriding accounts, it's fairly mediocre even by Marvel standards. The plot is threadbare and nonsensical, the tone is all over the place because we can't actually have things get too serious, and the characters are one-dimensional, a literal joke, or actually pretty fucked up yet we're supposed to root for them anyway. And the "twist" that Taskmaster is actually the bad guy's daughter is so obvious in retrospect that I'm surprised I didn't guess it before, after all the other examples of this same exact trope of "imposing masked character is actually a girl" in recent years.

And when it specifically comes to these two characters, it sounds like emotional manipulation like only Marvel can pull off. Red Guardian is the comic relief, which was pretty obvious from the trailers, but apparently he doesn't even do much more than that, and it doesn't help that said "jokes" end up screwing up the tone. As Drinker put it, "Isn't it funny how the only two male characters in this film are either portrayed as weak and pathetic or dumb and comical? Just something to think about." And Melina is an evil character complicit in the bad guy's crimes for decades, literally torturing animals to come up with the shit that he uses to keep the Black Widows under his control, but apparently everyone just lets her off the hook in the end because she's really sorry I guess. When you consider that one of the writers from WandaVision worked on this too, that at least explains the dubious morality better.

Bob: Disney isn't going to hire you no matter how much praise you heap on their turds. You're an embarrassment.
From what I've seen most people are complaining that Taskmaster was done dirty (also that the movie is dumb and boring). Its a shame as I remember the character being a fun villain with a cool costume with a skull and a interesting ability. But its modern Marvel movie so the writers don't give two flying shits about what villain they drag and drop for the bad guy as they will kill them off at the end of the movie anyway. Also the costume isn't going to fly as the bat eaters don't like spooky scary skeletons so they will have a intern run down to a sporting good store and pick up a couple paint ball masks to spray paint as Kevin Feige uses the saved cash for more blow and child prostitutes.
I'm guessing either the writers drew names from a hat and whatever it landed on is what the bad was going to be, or more cynically decided to Mandarin it, wait to see if the nerds online bitch, then come back in a few years saying OH NO GUYS THATS NOT THE REAL CHARACTER, but if you want to see them come watch "Captain America 6: this time he's asian" in theaters this summer!

On a side note I hear Black Widow saves the day by smashing her head into a desk and breaking her nose/giving herself a brain injury which :story:

the Red Guardian existed as a sort of antihero/antivillain type that was sort of a love interest/foil to BW and sort of a foil to Captain America. I just remember him being dead in the 70s era defenders comics or sth.

He's sort of an interesting footnote and maybe one of the "legacies" that Marvel comics uses when they need a Russian Superhero team slapped together (alongside another Crimson Dynamo ofc), but it's a bit of a stretch to say that he's someone fans would want merchandise of, even as a trading card.

Oh well, they did release merch.

View attachment 2335045 View attachment 2335046

Ok surely they couldn't have released like, Crimson Dynamo or Ursa Major? Right?

View attachment 2335048
(ok there's quite a few crimson dynamo figures. makes sense since he's one of the more well known iron man rogues. he's also pretty easy to design for figures too.)

View attachment 2335049

10 year old me would have liked this. But to be fair, Bob has the mind of a 5 year old. He probably thinks this shit's high culture and all that bullshit. It's fun to look at and to be aware it exists, but collecting action figures on this scale is a hell of a consoomer hobby, unless you're a boomer or uberfan of one specific character/team, where it's slightly saner to say, collect some nice quality figures of The Defenders or maybe some specific iteration of a team like the Justice League International.

Even then, I don't see any love or understanding of superheroes from bob. All I do see is an autistic, unlovable, and fucked up manchild.
Action figure companies have done that for YEARS by this point. In a way its kinda a brilliant way to prey on consumers as:
Encourages people to buy all 6 figures instead of the one or two that you actually want. It also:
Gets people to buy crappy figures like "The same iron man figures you already have but painted black/in translucent blue.
Gets people to buy the set because what the fuck am I going to do with one arm of a 6 part action figure I might as well get the rest.
Gets people to buy figures of characters no one cares about (seriously do even comic fans give a fuck about iron heart?)
Gets people to buy the full set because the character often gets very little Merchandise (if any at all).
Gets consoomers excited because "LOOK ITS BIGGER THEN THE REST OMG I NEED IT".

I know there used to be quite the community around these things, no idea what it looks like now in days. The whole thing surrounding action figures (specifically marvel legends) is interesting and honestly needs its own thread (or at least a in-depth post) but this is not really the place for it.
And like you said, a kid/hardcore collectors/comic fans would probably be pretty interested in this. Bob on the other hand likes it because its a marvel branded bear and If you dare call him out about his knowledge of what that character is then by god you will feel the full fury of the wikipedia article.
 
And to add to that, Steve Trevor was pleading with Diana to let him go after he learned the truth about the Dream Stone. I won't say that Wonder Woman 1984 is a good movie, but I think I know what Patty Jenkins was trying to do with that story thread. However, she didn't consider the moral implications of bringing Steve back in another man's body. Come to think of it, what that even necessary? I assume that the stone had the power to warp reality and could have materialized him without having to steal someone else's body.

What she was going for was probably that thing people do where they lose somebody they cared very much about and do everything they can to keep that person with them, even in a toxic way. (Eg, trying to make future prospective partners behave more like the person they lost, judging them by how similar they are to them.) Giving up Steve was, for Wonder Woman, equal to us leaving the past in the past and appreciating what we had, instead of trying to force everything in our lives to live up to that standard.

On a similar train of thought, Wonder Woman and Captain America both use nigh-omnipotence as a way to get with the person they love consequence-free in duplicitous circumstances. According to Marvel and DC, the thing our heroes aspire to do with ultimate power is rape, and I just don't know how to feel about that.
 
From what I've seen most people are complaining that Taskmaster was done dirty (also that the movie is dumb and boring). Its a shame as I remember the character being a fun villain with a cool costume with a skull and a interesting ability. But its modern Marvel movie so the writers don't give two flying shits about what villain they drag and drop for the bad guy as they will kill them off at the end of the movie anyway. Also the costume isn't going to fly as the bat eaters don't like spooky scary skeletons so they will have a intern run down to a sporting good store and pick up a couple paint ball masks to spray paint as Kevin Feige uses the saved cash for more blow and child prostitutes.
I'm guessing either the writers drew names from a hat and whatever it landed on is what the bad was going to be, or more cynically decided to Mandarin it, wait to see if the nerds online bitch, then come back in a few years saying OH NO GUYS THATS NOT THE REAL CHARACTER, but if you want to see them come watch "Captain America 6: this time he's asian" in theaters this summer!

On a side note I hear Black Widow saves the day by smashing her head into a desk and breaking her nose/giving herself a brain injury which :story:


Action figure companies have done that for YEARS by this point. In a way its kinda a brilliant way to prey on consumers as:
Encourages people to buy all 6 figures instead of the one or two that you actually want. It also:
Gets people to buy crappy figures like "The same iron man figures you already have but painted black/in translucent blue.
Gets people to buy the set because what the fuck am I going to do with one arm of a 6 part action figure I might as well get the rest.
Gets people to buy figures of characters no one cares about (seriously do even comic fans give a fuck about iron heart?)
Gets people to buy the full set because the character often gets very little Merchandise (if any at all).
Gets consoomers excited because "LOOK ITS BIGGER THEN THE REST OMG I NEED IT".

I know there used to be quite the community around these things, no idea what it looks like now in days. The whole thing surrounding action figures (specifically marvel legends) is interesting and honestly needs its own thread (or at least a in-depth post) but this is not really the place for it.
And like you said, a kid/hardcore collectors/comic fans would probably be pretty interested in this. Bob on the other hand likes it because its a marvel branded bear and If you dare call him out about his knowledge of what that character is then by god you will feel the full fury of the wikipedia article.
see the fun part would be to ask Bob some more academically worded question like "What do you think about the parallels between Superman Red Son/Superman OG and Red Guardian/Captain America (Steve Rogers)"

he wouldn't be able to answer such a simple question.


also year action figure companies know what they're doing. i'm cool with it because it's a fun thing to look at. i wouldn't buy them as an adult though.
 
It was completely unnecessary, remember the part where multiple groups materialize nukes from thin air?
They just needed to give WW her own selfish desire to want and later sacrifice at the end, so Steve had to use someone else's body.

I think that just highlights how sloppily the movie was conceived and edited, plotwise.

The stone can magic up actual things out of nothingness: Nuclear Weapons But can't magic up just one guy who already existed, it needs a "host" to do that?

Being inconsistent within your own fictional universe in regards to it's rules/timelines/lore is the sign of a bad writer and what did in the later Disney attempts at Star Wars... the Force was never shown as a healing power, but now it can. Jump Troopers have existed in books/comics/RPGs for decades, but treated as a new thing. Entire fleets and military organizations appear or disappear from the scene depending on the plot with no explanation as to where they came from, etc.

Every movie is imperfect since it's not reality and is going to have plot holes where things happen unbound by breaking time/space laws of our world, but a GOOD movie has as few violations as possible.

If the stone's seeming inconsistent behavior was the ONLY thing, you could hand-wave it away as saying "The Stone is chaotic and personally spiteful by it's nature, it has the power to do ANYTHING but will always CHOOSE a way that HURTS you, be it ending the world, breaking your heart or turning you into a anthropomorphic Cheeta-thing no one will love"

But when stacked up on dozens of other 'wait, what?" moments, the whole thing comes crashing down as too much suspension of disbelief is required.
 
Last edited:
From what I've seen most people are complaining that Taskmaster was done dirty (also that the movie is dumb and boring). Its a shame as I remember the character being a fun villain with a cool costume with a skull and a interesting ability. But its modern Marvel movie so the writers don't give two flying shits about what villain they drag and drop for the bad guy as they will kill them off at the end of the movie anyway. Also the costume isn't going to fly as the bat eaters don't like spooky scary skeletons so they will have a intern run down to a sporting good store and pick up a couple paint ball masks to spray paint as Kevin Feige uses the saved cash for more blow and child prostitutes.
I'm guessing either the writers drew names from a hat and whatever it landed on is what the bad was going to be, or more cynically decided to Mandarin it, wait to see if the nerds online bitch, then come back in a few years saying OH NO GUYS THATS NOT THE REAL CHARACTER, but if you want to see them come watch "Captain America 6: this time he's asian" in theaters this summer!

On a side note I hear Black Widow saves the day by smashing her head into a desk and breaking her nose/giving herself a brain injury which :story:

It always seems like it's one step forward, two steps back with the villains in the MCU.

Every time they do a Thanos, or Kilmonger, or Vulture, you think they've finally figured it out. You think they've cracked the code on how to make a memorable, iconic villain.

But then you get 3 more unmemorable non-characters.

This was always a problem for me because I love villains. I'm much more of a villain guy than a hero guy. It's probably one of the reasons I love the horror genre so much. It's a genre that's very often driven by the villains.
 
Unless your brain is somehow preserved, I can't think of how your mind would be "uploaded" to a machine, leaving your meat body braindead. At best, it'd be a copy of your consciousness. Which means that, for all intents and purposes from the outside, you're immortal. However, that copy is exactly that. You, personally, will be dead, but your copy will live on. It's not true immortality.

And I don't think the Diabetic Dictator would go for that.

Discounting the spiritual arguments for a moment, REAL science (not I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE) has pondered the question about if you "survive" the transfer process into the robotic body, assuming the technology to transfer "consciousness" can or ever will exist.

It's what I've seen called the "Swamp Man" hypothesis.

If you "copy" your brain into a new vessel, does consciousness as we know it come along? Or do you die once you leave your original body? And the new being isn't really "you", just one created and born with all your memories already? And how could you tell?

Your new robo-self will presumably have all your memories, all your personality foibles, all your vices, and would pass any test you could give it to authenticate itself as you. But, because it is "born" knowing everything you did right up until the "transfer mind" switch was thrown, there's no way to know what happened to the "original" consciousness.

Simply put, would the transfer process kill you? Would the new robo-Bob be a totally new creation that was born at that very moment, but convinced he was number one? With nothing ANY form of science could do to prove him wrong?

The same question pops up when people start arguing if the Star Trek transporter is physically possible, and if so, what unforseen things might happen. Every time you are disassembled and reassembled molecule-by-molecule, is the instance of you at the ship dying? Just without "you" knowing it? With the "you" on the planet being a totally new person, alive only until the next beaming kills them and constructs yet another?

Functionally,, it could look like the robo-immortality process works, yet in a funny twist of fate, everyone who opts for it actually kills themselves in the process? The "immortal" we see is just Bob2, and Bob Prime died the instant he giddily pushed the "Live Forever" button?

TL : DR - immortality through technology may be possible, but can you enjoy it? Or like a scratched up Xbox disc, are you tossed away and a new functionally identical one slapped into the drive to continue "living" and appearing like nothing's changed to all outsiders and even the user himself? While the distinct original is rotting away in the trash? No longer part of the system?
 
Last edited:
Discounting the spiritual arguments for a moment, REAL science has pondered the question about if you "survive" the transfer process into the robotic body, assuming the technology to transfer "consciousness" can or ever will exist.

It's what I've seen called the "Swamp Man" hypothesis.

If you "copy" your brain into a new vessel, does consciousness as we know it come along? Or do you die once you leave your original body? And the new being isn't really "you", just one created and born with all your memories already? And how could you tell?

Your new robo-self will presumably have all your memories, all your personality foibles, all your vices, and would pass any test you could give it to authenticate itself as you. But, because it is "born" knowing everything you did right up until the "transfer mind" switch was thrown, there's no way to know what happened to the "original" consciousness.

Simply put, would the transfer process kill you? Would the new robo-Bob be a totally new creation that was born as we understand a life beginning at that very moment, just unaware? And how could you tell?

The same question pops up when people start arguing if the Star Trek transporter is physically possible, and if so, what unforseen things might happen. Every time you are disassembled and reassembled molecule-by-molecule, is the instance of you at the ship dying? Just without "you" knowing it? With the "you" on the planet being a totally new person, alive only until the next beaming kills them and constructs yet another?

Functionally,, it could look like the robo-immortality process works, yet in a funny twist of fate, everyone who opts for it actually kills themselves in the process? The "immortal" we see is just Bob2, and Bob Prime died the instant he giddily pushed the "Live Forever" button?
Even more terrifying: Bob puts his consciousness in a robot body, but doesn't die. Now there are two (or more) Bobs, Metal-Bob and Flesh-Bob.
 
Bob would likely look at the death toll caused by Marxist anti-"god-botherers" and say it's fine because the mayonnaise wasteland ghouls of their respective countries needed to be rendered obsolete in minecraft, and they were, so it's all good, right friendo? Bad things need to happen to bad people, and it obviously did! No more superstition standing in the way of the Soopeeryah Fyootchah that I earned!



That might be why he's so fundamentally repugnant, he's not too stupid to realize the misery he's advocating, or too arrogant to know that absolute power will corrupt him the same as all the other ideologically pure who thought they could rebuild the world overnight with no casualties.... and deny they hurt anyone when it all falls apart? No, he openly thinks its a good thing that he'll become a cackling despot butchering millions on a whim because THAT'S how you get to the superior Bing Bing Wahoo future.

And if he becomes dimly aware that line of thought was becoming unpopular within the debate? Majority unpopular so he can't dismiss the one or two objectors as trolls and MAGAtards? And he couldn't get the plurality of small-brains around him to SEE that wholesale liquidation of undesirables was a good thing.... well, he'd fall back on the same defense the Tankies and Kommie Kids Klub members do: "Those numbers are highly contested and not proven" and then end the argument the self-assured "winner" yet again.

Even more terrifying: Bob puts his consciousness in a robot body, but doesn't die. Now there are two (or more) Bobs, Metal-Bob and Flesh-Bob.

I'd love to see it happen, and watch Bob try and use some "but without me you don't exist!" excuse to ward off the fact his robo-self would try to kill his meat-self off as an embarrassing obsolete version.
 
Last edited:
Even more terrifying: Bob puts his consciousness in a robot body, but doesn't die. Now there are two (or more) Bobs, Metal-Bob and Flesh-Bob.
Metal-Bob would see Flesh-Bob as Bobsolete and Flesh-Bob would be infinitely jealous at Metal-Bob for being functionally immortal, less (physically) ugly and diabetesless.

Therefore they’d absolutely fight to the death. Who would win?
 
Last edited:
That might be why he's so fundamentally repugnant, he's not too stupid to realize the misery he's advocating, or too arrogant to know that absolute power will corrupt him the same as all the other ideologically pure who thought they could rebuild the world overnight with no casualties.... and deny they hurt anyone when it all falls apart. No, he openly thinks its a good thing that he'll become a cackling despot butchering millions on a whim because THAT'S how you get to the superior Bing Bing Wahoo future.

And if he becomes dimly aware that line of though was becoming unpopular within the debate? Majority unpopular so he can't dismiss the one or two objectors as trolls and MAGAtards? And he couldn't get the plurality of small-brains around him to SEE that wholesale liquidation of undesirables was a good thing.... well, he'd fall back on the same defense the Tankies and Kommie Kids Klub members do: "Those numbers are highly contested and not proven" and then end the argument the self-assured "winner" yet again.



I'd love to see it happen, and watch Bob try and use some "but without me you don't exist!" excuse to ward off the fact his robo-self would try to kill his meat-self off as an embarrassing obsolete version.
Why stop there? Just imagine an army of Robobs all dressed in their finest Mario costumes, wiping out all the middle American mayo-ghouls before replacing them with yet more Bobs. The complete destruction of everything outside of the coasts replacing it with nothing but endless movie theaters, barcades, and McDonalds as far as the eye can see.
 
Metal-Bob would see Flesh-Bob as Bobsolete and Flesh-Bob would be infinitely jealous at Metal-Bob for being functionally immortal, less (physically) ugly and diabetesless.

Therefore they’d absolutely fight to the death. Who would win?
I've seen this movie before. Galaxy Express 999, personified in the character of Count Mecha.
 
If the stone's seeming inconsistent behavior was the ONLY thing, you could hand-wave it away as saying "The Stone is chaotic and personally spiteful by it's nature, it has the power to do ANYTHING but will always CHOOSE a way that HURTS you, be it ending the world, breaking your heart or turning you into a anthropomorphic Cheeta-thing no one will love"

But when stacked up on dozens of other 'wait, what?" moments, the whole thing comes crashing down as too much suspension of disbelief is required.
That's what I think they were going for, since I want to say they mentioned the stone being made by a Greek God. I assume they meant for the stone to have some kind of malicious intelligence but assumptions don't count. I remember while watching waiting for them to explain how rules of the stone but I don't think it ever happened. Oddly enough a scene where a character turned to the screen and just explained the stone probably would if made the movie a little better.
 
He knows. He was a randroid, but he's painted himself into a corner where the only people who will suck his e-cock are trannies, male feminists and non-tankie commie larpers.

If he responded the way any right thinking person would, "LOL, are you 13?" he'd lose followers and possibly patreon golds.
Possibly. Given his standard for obtaining political beliefs is to browse the checkmarks for their opinions, steal them, then turn those opinions up to 11, I'm not sure.

I'd argue that he claims he's a communist because he doesn't know what communism actually is. If it's the thing the girls with hairy armpits and mangled genitalia are into, he's all about it.

Fuck communists. If you cape for them, then fuck you too, Moviebob.
 
That's what I think they were going for, since I want to say they mentioned the stone being made by a Greek God. I assume they meant for the stone to have some kind of malicious intelligence but assumptions don't count. I remember while watching waiting for them to explain how rules of the stone but I don't think it ever happened. Oddly enough a scene where a character turned to the screen and just explained the stone probably would if made the movie a little better.
I kept waiting for her to say the stone was made by Eris but then she said it was made by the "god of lies," so apparently it was created by Lucifer.
Possibly. Given his standard for obtaining political beliefs is to browse the checkmarks for their opinions, steal them, then turn those opinions up to 11, I'm not sure.

I'd argue that he claims he's a communist because he doesn't know what communism actually is. If it's the thing the girls with hairy armpits and mangled genitalia are into, he's all about it.

Fuck communists. If you cape for them, then fuck you too, Moviebob.
That applies to most communists.
 
www.goodreads.com/book/show/468018.To_Live_Forever
1109609.jpg

In the far-future city of Clarges, you can live forever – if you can make the grade.

Jack Vance's book 'To Live Forever' is an interesting sci-fi story about a society that has figured out immortality. I recommend it, but I would also recommend most of Jack Vance's work.
 
Metal-Bob would see Flesh-Bob as Bobsolete and Flesh-Bob would be infinitely jealous at Metal-Bob for being functionally immortal, less (physically) ugly and diabetesless.

Therefore they’d absolutely fight to the death. Who would win?
Whoever wins, we lose
 
Whoever wins, we lose
Bob tries to run, trips over his own beetus-numbed feet, falls, breaks his neck.

Robobob declares history vindicated, sits down to use it's wireless capabilites to debate 50,000 Mayoghouls at once online, determined to win every argument no matter how long it goes. because unlike those obsoletes, he doesn't need sleep or food.

So distracted, it sits out in the rain for months until it's chassis locks up from rust and it's internal speaker craps out due to moisture corroding the wire contacts, rendering it unable to move or speak.

Thus it can't defend itself when a wandering band of hillbilly scrapmen pick it up and toss it in the back of a rusty F-250, mistaking it for an old water heater.

Robobob's last moments of forever-life are spent slowly going down the conveyor belt and into the furnace of a Chinese steel mill, unable to stop or protest, and is rendered into 5 million "BARON FOR PRESIDENT" campaign badges..... forever leaving him having no mouth, but needing to scream online all the same.

Actually, I think we all win in that scenario.
 
Last edited:
I kept waiting for her to say the stone was made by Eris but then she said it was made by the "god of lies," so apparently it was created by Lucifer.

That applies to most communists.
That threw me too, cause I was trying to remember which god made the stone and I immediately went for Eris but stopped cause I swore they said the God of lies made it but I don't remember there being a God of lies in Greek mythology.

Even if there is a God of lies in Greek myth it still doesn't make sense because what the stone makes is real, it just has a cost (sometimes). Eris being behind would make far more sense and probably would of allowed for a better climax cause you could have had WW and Eris faceoff at the end.
 
If you "copy" your brain into a new vessel, does consciousness as we know it come along? Or do you die once you leave your original body? And the new being isn't really "you", just one created and born with all your memories already? And how could you tell?
If consciousness depends on quantum states of the molecules of the brain, and transferring the quantum state will necessarily destroy the original one, although there are a minority of theorists who think that true quantum duplication is possible,

There is another wrinkle of transferring say Robert's brain state into a computer: Robert will know nothing about it happening! One moment he was looking at his fleshy paws then Pop! titanium-alloy claws! After the initial bewilderment he will recall consenting to this, but the actually process will feel like switching a TV channel.

He doesn't even realize this new idea his Teleseminar Scammer Mommy put in his head contradicts his entire backwards ass worldview. If it's institutions that create global problems and not individuals, that means his obsession with genociding all the dirty, lower class rural right-wingers is completely stupid and pointless, because it wouldn't help anything. Anita just accidentally destroyed every single idea he holds dear in his black, morbid, cholesterol clogged heart and he doesn't even realize it.
It is futile to look for consistency in Bobby's thinking, but "problems are not individual's fault, hence change the system to my liking" (or, in the mortal words of Joshua Alcorn, "Fix Society. Please") is indeed a main refrain. He thinks, for example, that people shouldn't try to vote the GOP out; we should change the Constitution to make the Republican Party illegal. And while he parades empty words about patronizing cinemas to prevent them from shutting down, the real onus is on the government to pump money to "save the arts".

+ + + +
It turns out people are bored by Peter Coffin dunking on Bobby too; his tweet got hardly any engagement:
3532.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back