- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
It was completely unnecessary, remember the part where multiple groups materialize nukes from thin air?And to add to that, Steve Trevor was pleading with Diana to let him go after he learned the truth about the Dream Stone. I won't say that Wonder Woman 1984 is a good movie, but I think I know what Patty Jenkins was trying to do with that story thread. However, she didn't consider the moral implications of bringing Steve back in another man's body. Come to think of it, what that even necessary? I assume that the stone had the power to warp reality and could have materialized him without having to steal someone else's body.
I saw secondary theme of people not knowing want they truly wanted. Steve's death in the original film didn't leave Diana with any sense of closure so she held a candle for him for sixty-six years hence it took the end of the world for her to confront and accept the truth of her loss. Similarly, I saw Maxwell Lord in a similar vein. He didn't his son to look at him as a loser and got caught up in his greed until he received that epiphany at the climax and realized that he wanted to be a better father.
Damn, I think Wonder Woman 1984 could have been a much better film with script revisions and more editing.
They just needed to give WW her own selfish desire to want and later sacrifice at the end, so Steve had to use someone else's body.