Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

Lmfao the deadlift is an exercise that is supposed to strengthen your back, not fuck it up. The fact that Ian admits he did this twice is a testament to how retarded he is. If you look in the quote tweets you'll see people roasting him for poor form or just being a shit weightlifter.
I bet he pulled 2 pl8 and fucking fell over
 
▪︎ There's anti imperialism themes

▪︎ Armies are painted in a bad light
I always thought firebending was the coolest and Phoenix King Ozai was the most badass character, so I guess Vaush is sort of right on this one.
I also thought it was bullshit how Aang just whooped Ozai's ass because muh avatar state, and doesn't even have to go through the internal conflict of killing him as an air nomad and instead gets some bullshit turtle powers.
 
I always thought firebending was the coolest and Phoenix King Ozai was the most badass character, so I guess Vaush is sort of right on this one.
I also thought it was bullshit how Aang just whooped Ozai's ass because muh avatar state, and doesn't even have to go through the internal conflict of killing him as an air nomad and instead gets some bullshit turtle powers.
>set up an interesting internal ideological conflict, where a pacifist character who struggles with the realization that killing someone may be the only way to keep the world safe
>literally two episodes before the finale, the main character gets a powerup that conveniently allows him to resolve the plot without addressing this internal conflict

There's a lot to like about Avatar, but the ending firmly reminded me that I was watching was a children's cartoon. Though I have issues with Parasyte, it does the same idea way better.
 
1627520195565.png


Ouch
 
>If we make my hypothetical society a Market Socialist country then we’ll have the economic leverage to never have to go to war
>We just have to wait it out until the rest of the countries also turn into Market Socialist countries

Insanely optimistic. His hypothetical Market Socialist societies are just going to be capitalistic in nature. Market Socialism doesn’t abolish private property, it just creates more owners in a company. Who the fuck would bother going to war with a country that is basically just socialist in name?

Actually, if I’m a country that wants Market ‘Socialism’ but no wars, then why would I label myself as fucking socialist? Would that not create a target on my back from a foreign propaganda perspective?

This is all so deeply retarded.

Vaush also falls into the trap that those who believe that raw resources are power when that isn't even the case when a nation like Japan with no resources has one of the most advanced economies in the world along with the Swiss. He also fails to understand that nations that just make cheap consumer goods like china are more destroyed in wars because their economy is heavily dependent on foreign trade where America could survive without China but China without western trade would have its economy completely implode.
 
Is there a term for people who say the are some sort of far-left ideology like Marxist-Communism or Anarchism, but side with mainstream Dems and progressives that make north of 100k+ a year most of the time? I feel like there should be one.
Champagne Socialist
Calling them a Parlor Pink also works.

“Because revolution—armed uprising—requires not only dissatisfaction but aggressiveness. A revolutionist has to be willing to fight and die—or he’s just a parlor pink. If you separate out the aggressive ones and make them the sheep dogs, the sheep will never give you trouble.” - Major Reed, Starship Troopers
 
Vaush also falls into the trap that those who believe that raw resources are power when that isn't even the case when a nation like Japan with no resources has one of the most advanced economies in the world along with the Swiss. He also fails to understand that nations that just make cheap consumer goods like china are more destroyed in wars because their economy is heavily dependent on foreign trade where America could survive without China but China without western trade would have its economy completely implode.
The United States most assuredly could manufacture to the level of China and remain profitable and relatively cheap for American consumers. The issue then is that American Corporations wouldn't be able to play the stock market like they have been for decades. This isn't even taking into consideration that China is suppressing their currency intentionally, even as it is starting to show an inability to work. Their workers are paid about the same as is comparable to other nation's steel industries. They're losing that cheapness edge they once had. All the while they've spent their resources and money on infrastructure that isn't in use, and is actively falling apart. Consuming more of their own resources for internal projects than is exported.

China is a paper tiger whose bubble would burst if they got into war with the United States. The United States would suffer a great deal if they went to war in the short term, and the president that presided over that would suffer greatly. They're both locked in a stale mate and China isn't making the right moves to take advantage of the United States weaknesses. Since they're repeating many of the same mistakes and as such will reach the same end faster than the United States did.
 
Cow crossover
The gender trash goblin is aiming to take Vaush down....
View attachment 2388363

They had one convo about 6 months ago when his own chat wanted to cancel a teenage girl for saying the nword years ago and being denied acceptance to an university.


Didn't had anything to do with what Vaush was arguing with the chat about so he just interjected like the retard he is, but it was pretty friendly, so I assume that whatever he's going to talk about Vaush is probably going to be something insignificant, most likely scold him for his neopronouns takes.

256742.jpg
 
Beyond that, this is something that has bothered me regarding a lot of internet political commentators. Why do they constantly use literal cartoon shows, many of them being made for younger viewers, to try and justify their recent political developments? Is it a dangerous lack of book consumption, or some kind of coping mechanism to try and justify their viewpoints with characters that are appealing to large swaths of people? I don't know, but I always get the vibe that the same kinds of people who unironically use children's cartoons to justify their politics are the same kinds of "grown-ups" that still eat children's breakfast cereals.
I had a roommate in College who cited Bug's Life & Shark Tale as her "Communist awakening", needless to say she was one of the most insufferable people I've ever met. The worst part is that I honestly think this sort of behavoir is worryingly common amongst zoomers.
 
Last edited:
Vaush complains about tankies being anti-American, yet he openly said that he himself is anti-American.

One thing I've noticed Vaush does is use the "Not as Bad as" fallacy. Social activists and social advocates who want to tackle a political issue he doesn't want to see get addressed, he'll say that there are more serious problems to address instead. Implying you can't care and shouldn't care about both at the same time.
Vaush is just like Trump. He cucks when he thinks a position is getting too much pushback. This explains many hypocrisies.
 
Back