As I previously said, I have expanded the wiki article. I have tried to respect her pronouns, and can only ask that people who contribute do the same. It is unprofessional and unencyclopedic to blithly ignore them.
Liars gonna lie, his pseudo-bait starts here, unless I missed more BS.
That's very unprofessional of you
More “baity” BS. Paints part of his agenda. Putting on his nice guy fedora.
I tried to use techniques that are proven to work on wikipedia: (relatively) reliable sourcing, neutral point of view, and adherence to a conservative take on biographies of living persons. As I said, I'm more familiar with articles for wikipedia, and have tried to do the same on the chris chan wiki.
Total lies, trying to come off “relatable” etc.
I see trolls from Kiwi Farms coming to wikipedia, and I just wanted to engage with you and try to deter the unproductive vandalism that apparently seems to come from your quarters. I have been nothing but respectful, and hope that the same can be extended back to Wikipedia.
He see’s
trolls. He has no clue about this site, yet feels he is able to write about it “
professionally” so, he is kinda-baiting (badly) & not too bright. Agenda coming out w/ more clarity.
The article is very fair and balanced and does not pull punches on the nature of the actions. Pronouns are simply a matter of professionalism.
No they aren’t. Wikipaedo’s don’t even have
one real style guide, followed in a professional manner.
Crappy wannabe-bait & giving excuses for his
documented unprofessionalism. This is gettin’ rich!
You tards constantly edit articles to remove opinions and information you don't like, and you've edited the Wiki page for KF to implicate us in multiple suicides with no evidence whatsoever. You can keep gargling nonsense around the obviously politically biased cock in your mouth or fuck off back to your echo chamber, you disingenuous cunt.
So much proof of this. Check out the multiple articles from lauded, professional, writers, who the Wikipaedo’s “edit crew” won’t cite in their bull shit
bio’s & articles, about that author themselves; direct quotes the likes of which any pro journalist would kill for. If not published by one of their approved, usually left-wing, agenda mags, as well as approved by a head-case, ego-trip, power-mod. We know. Any whose spent time here knows. Everybody knows. Truth outs in the end, popularity contests don’t mean shit, when it comes to truth, which eventually rises.
>everyone is taking GorillaWarfares bait
How embarrassing.
I like your pfp, rated

as I don’t think
everyone is “taking bait” or not all/ not many. I agree the Wikipaedo dude, shitting up the thread, has an agenda, but I don’t think it’s anything serious-bait, worthy. I think he’s confused, he is baiting, definitely gaming, but it’s himself who loses by it. Why bother, he’s never bothered to see that we document & archive better than most trial attorneys. That scares people like him, etc. We know what we are about. We share already public stuff, archived, we don’t make-up that stuff, that others said, we have proof. We don’t write the BS the lolcows etc say. They hate KF as it mirrors what they’ve said. We know. We’ve got a high ground, always have. We just don’t care about proving it to those that
do make-up shit. Fuck em cause they can’t take a joke, either. We are fine. Him baiting, (lol) only hurts himself. I agree, taking bait is lame in general.
Many people (self included) have decided to respond to this one, & I can’t speak to why. I mainly wanted to point out the patterns I saw, & have a rhetorical Q or 2, plus 1 vid. And this hasn’t been real bait, it’s crap try-hard shit.
Wikipedia in general is a meme. I remember all of the times that Jimbo begged for monies for his site.
Word. I learned a lot about their lack of professionalism here actually, where their own words, & various archives, show the truth. Why does anyone think all the 15k people are swarming KF? They know we watch, record, archive. Any normie, not butthurt or narcissistic (like so many SJW’s & Troon’s) can easily see all the evidence besides the jokes we crack, if they ever actually look at the site. Our forum is a well oiled machine, comparatively. A lot of jealous ones say otherwise for their own greasy agenda.
I actually haven't substantively edited that page. If you believe that there is no evidence, you are more than welcome to engage in the bold-revert-discuss process, and contest the sourcing on that article.
Liars gonna lie. What a line.
Your Wikipedia userpage shows you to be an unabashed far-left tranny (
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GorillaWarfare)
While you LARP as a right-winger as you shit up the CWCki
sonichu.com
Someone is really desperate for attention, even if they have to seek the disreputable kind.
I mean this sincerely: please kill yourself, faggot.
I‘ll have to read those links later, & we probably have them archived already. Not in the mood to read it tonight. Archives rule, & our rule is archive everything. Liar’s of Wikipaedo, make-up their own interpretations, aka, they lie.
Attention, I think you hit the nail on the head, that’s gotta be part of this weird shitting-up that he’s doing. Gorilla Try-Hard.
I think it's extremely unfortunate that Near has apparently commited suicide. I also think that if you believe they have not commited suicide, it is best to simply engage with the process, for instance by pointing out correctly that tweets are not appropriate as reliable sources, unless they are from a verifiably reliable source (please check out our perenial sources board for some examples).
As if that didn’t happen. Things false were pointed out from the start of the gay-ops you are obviously part of. Playing dumb/ innocent etc is a bad look, dude. Are you getting off on pretending to be some wonderful fair Wikipaedo editor tonight? Don’t answer, it’s clear. Really, don’t.
Convinced this is bait, because any retard on Twitter thinks Kiwifarms is literally hell or something, but can you politely fuck off?
He’ll politely use his pseudo-bait, maybe he’s trying to impress some other troon, tell scary stories, or say how
hard he tried but evil KF blah blah etc. But it’s all lies, all here, archived forever. We good. He’s simply exposing his games, more. & posing. Polite poseur.
If you feel so, you should engage in the process. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised! Consensus on Wikipedia is built through discussion, and on more than one occassion, we have deprecated unreliable sources, even if they are of a political persuasion you seem to think Wikipedia has.
We have all the proof we need of exactly what Wikipaedo’s do for
process. More proof comes, as days go by. The truth is there, for any to see. Also, this:
Bets?
I think gorilla whatever his name is, is trying to impress a fellow sjw troon, for a
romantic angle. The attention he seeks isn’t from us, but from someone he will embellish a
war story to, later.
$20 on that. Place bets!
Also, niggercocktroonbrigade. & fuck rape.