- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
I'm in two minds about Kelly and her accomplices.
On one hand, they've shone a light on Chris's depravity and alleged criminal actions, which need to be dealt with via due legal process. On the other hand, their methods to extract evidence relating to Chris's depravity appear to be downright scummy.
I'm not a lawyer, but could Kelly's alleged actions be seen as incitement to commit a crime? Idk what the charge is under Virginia law (accessory?), and idk if the fact Kelly being in Texas will have an impact i.e. would she be charged and tried under Texas law, or would she be extradited to Virginia? Although I suspect the latter is unlikely given that she is allegedly an accessory rather than a perpetrator.
*I might not be a lawyer, but I have enough awareness to know that it's all "alleged" until the suspect is sentenced by a court of law
There's a difference between being saying "I'll be watching you guys" and "I'd love to watch you guys". I'm not sure if the former counts as incitement. Maybe tacit incitement at best (if such a thing exists).
You guys are acting like you just busted some major granny banging trafficking ring, lol!
Look, Chris hasn’t even formally been charged or found guilty of a crime (not exactly sure what the arrest today was for.)
But even assuming that he’s charged and found guilty for rape or incest, police and prosecutors have enough actual crimes on their plates to deal with.
Yeah, hypothesizing whether a law was broken or not is all fun and good.
But if you seriously expect a prosecutor to start going through Internet chatlogs and spend time on charging a bunch of autists for talking to a motherfucking autist..
Well, you’ll probably end up like Bob. Disappointed.