[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
So no, absolutely not obstruction.

As for the people saying that she could suffer legal repercussions for coercing Chris to commit a felony, I cannot fathom a situation in which you could argue that someone was coerced to commit rape except under threat of physical violence. There is no evidence that Chris was coerced. He's just an incestuous rapist, and Kelly is just a piece of shit that finds it funny. There's only one criminal here.
Caveat not-a-lawyeur, but from what I've read online:

"Accessory before the fact" / "Complicity" charge only requires one of these:
1) you were aware of the rape and did nothing to prevent it
2) you encouraged the rape ("psychological influence") < this is enhanced by Chris being mentally disabled and Kelly being of sound mind

This makes you a "principal in the second degree" and you're legally an accessory to the rape.
If the prosecutors find Chris' texts with Kelly (and they will) and she encouraged him, I'm pretty certain she will be charged.
 
Law enforcement is much less likely to take Kelly seriously than people think. Its incredibly hard to prove internet crimes especially in the age of IP spoofing and throw away accounts. All she has to say is that she never met CWC and it quickly becomes KF word against hers. Unless Null decides to start handing data from the farms to police it would be hard to do anything.
Hard agree, which is why Kelly making an absolute muck out of her internet security and panic deleting all of her social media is so funny. The only thing it does is confirm guilt, at least in the eyes of the internet. She could have just rode this out, completely ignored the controversy on her accounts, and got out of it mostly in-tact. Now she's going to have to reboot.

Keep in mind CWC and her communicated on mobile phones, not just online.
It's more difficult than people think to get circumstantial evidence from text. Unless she sent a text along the lines of "please fuck your mom for me," police interest (and likelihood of warrant) are nil. I'm not ruling that out, mind you, but it seems like a longshot.
 
Law enforcement is much less likely to take Kelly seriously than people think. Its incredibly hard to prove internet crimes especially in the age of IP spoofing and throw away accounts. All she has to say is that she never met CWC and it quickly becomes KF word against hers. Unless Null decides to start handing data from the farms to police it would be hard to do anything.
They can subpoena Null for the data. I personally don't see that as likely though as there doesn't seem to be any smoking gun that she orchestrated it, just that she didn't report it immediately -- and there is already ample evidence on that front. I think a lot of people are assuming orchestration since that has happened so often to Chris in the past, but telling Chris to post racist stuff or shove a medallion up his butt is not even remotely on the same level.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Nameless One
Caveat not-a-lawyeur, but from what I've read online:

"Accessory before the fact" / "Complicity" charge only requires one of these:
1) you were aware of the rape and did nothing to prevent it
2) you encouraged the rape ("psychological influence") < this is enhanced by Chris being mentally disabled and Kelly being of sound mind

This makes you a "principal in the second degree" and you're legally an accessory to the rape.
If the prosecutors find Chris' texts with Kelly (and they will) and she encouraged him, I'm pretty certain she will be charged.
I think if anything, this is plausible over the coercion thing people are spewing. That phone call of Kelly saying quite literally "well if god said it was okay than it's okay" is encouraging it.
 
What I want to know as a serious question is how these people thought that this wasn't exactly what would happen if they FAAFO.
Because they were "anonymous". People don't realize how big of a deal it is to not cross contaminate files and info with personal data. Its why I am considering getting a separate pc simply for the Farms.
 
Guyzzz let’s not argue about laws, when we can talk about Kelly Osborn and ask her questions like: did you draw any artwork of Chris raping Barb?
Her Twitter was full of incest pics and pics of dinosaurs with 12 inch dicks chasing little girls.
Now that I think about it, she probably was getting off from that recording lol
 
Coerce Chris into incest? No. Gently coax Chris into something he's been proved to be mulling over for years? Possible but given their shit job at covering their tracks that's not something I'd buy from them.

This smells of right place right time but being a fucking idiot about it on the farms isn't how to move past this, it just makes you a target, zoomers.
 
Knowing that they were involved in some subreddit and involved in sketching and drawing porn,

It's possible that their end goal was to try and groom CwC into making incest porn as well, for them to leak later to their subreddit
Indeed, the worst case senario is this was encouraged by those involved, we already have evidence of complicity from the audio logs, You can argue it was to pry more info out of chris but the fact they held onto it for a week, potenially letting barb get sexually abused in the meantime and the simply upload it for asspats is evidence enough that they gave zero fucks about anyones wellbeing. And for posterity sake no it wont hold up in court be that doesnt mean they arent guilty as sin foe being disgusting fucking creeps.
 
Coerce Chris into incest? No. Gently coax Chris into something he's been proved to be mulling over for years? Possible but given their shit job at covering their tracks that's not something I'd buy from them.

This smells of right place right time but being a fucking idiot about it on the farms isn't how to move past this, it just makes you a target, zoomers.
My current theory is that they were planning to troll Chris at Everfree (they convinced him to go in the first place), and were planning it for months.
Then they roped in Fiona, to try and make her meet Chris at Everfree and become his sweetheart (or they wanted to kick two autistics at once, very likely.)
But then they found out about the incest, and decided to leak that instead, not realizing the repercussions and fully assuming he'd still make it to Everfree.
 
Guyzzz let’s not argue about laws, when we can talk about Kelly Osborn and ask her questions like: did you draw any artwork of Chris raping Barb?
Her Twitter was full of incest pics and pics of dinosaurs with 12 inch dicks chasing little girls.
One only very slightly comforting thought I've gotten out of this is at least we now know that Chris will proactively admit to *anything*, which means that at least the dogs never received the treatment that Barb did, or we would've heard about it already.
 
Because they were "anonymous". People don't realize how big of a deal it is to not cross contaminate files and info with personal data. Its why I am considering getting a separate pc simply for the Farms.
just repurpose an old shitty laptop or something. boom, cheap as hell device for the farms.
 
My current theory is that they were planning to troll Chris at Everfree (they convinced him to go in the first place), and were planning it for months.
Then they roped in Fiona, to try and make her meet Chris at Everfree and become his sweetheart (or they wanted to kick two autistics at once, very likely.)
But then they found out about the incest, and decided to leak that instead, not realizing the repercussions and fully assuming he'd still make it to Everfree.

I genuinely think this is it but they're could be another twist in the tale somewhere
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back