US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I already got mine back in April/May. If the jab is worth anything, it should be no skin off my ass if other people choose to not get it.

IMO, vaccine hesitancy isn't driven by Fox News or even legitimate concerns about the side effects. It's driven by the circlejerking Pharisees who won't get the hell off their high horse about being vaxxed.

They've become more obnoxiously outspoken preachy about their jab than all the vegans, CrossFitters, and atheists put together.

Anyone who takes a vaccine selfie or has a mask in their PFP isn't doing it because they care about other people. They're doing it to be seen and get asspats. They're the worst kind of sanctimonious narcissists.
I agree. If I do get my vaccine. I will not be pandering it around and pretending that I am better than anyone else on here.
 
Screenshot 2021-08-05 at 11-43-36 Jack Posobiec, IWO 🇺🇸 ( JackPosobiec) Twitter.png


Screenshot 2021-08-05 at 11-44-02 Richard Trumka, head of AFL-CIO union federation, dies at 72.png


This is the same union fag who looked coke'd up when interviewed about why he supported Biden who just killed union jobs with the pipeline

 
I hope you are as vociferous as you are about the need to point out this sort of language as toxic to them as you are about the need to point out anti-Semitism as toxic to us.

Of course! It's gone about as well as you'd expect, especially in real life situations, but it's important to do.

His COVID policies alone are as deranged as Trump's were, where he would say something at the daily briefing and Fauci would contradict it and Birx would contradict that. I don't know why it's so hard to set weekly check-ins for a bunch of measures and just say, "Best to wear masks this week, folks. If we're down to X hospitalizations this time next week, let's celebrate by carrying out from a local restaurant. Stay safe out there, America." Just focus people's energies on one thing at a time, don't force them to do anything, but make them feel part of something. We had that a little at the start but it got pissed away fairly rapidly.

Biden literally campaigned on doing a better job, and he's made it worse. You can't control the virus, but you can control the messaging and the resource management. It's been a shitshow.

I completely agree with you, and I think it all comes down to a reticence to admit that things are getting worse. 100 days, he was going to control the spread and open Biden. Now, the spread is spreading and we're getting ready to close Biden. The administration's clearly valuing political gain over our lives, and I'm frightened to see where things are going to go from here.

Fuck that. Treat threats like threats. Whether they really mean it or not doesn’t really matter. They still said it with a straight face and they’ll keep doing it. You have to start making assumptions at some point.

This statement is naive at best, and an attempt at feigning ignorance at worst.

You're both right, I've been kind of desensitized by everything that's happening. For example, the poster asking if people in Texas were going to start shooting people crossing the border:

Speaking of war and the border, since you seem to have your ear to the ground, do you see a point at which some of the more threatened (financially or physically) people in the border states reach a breaking point and start shooting migrants?

I've been hearing some of the interviews with ranchers in Texas and the way they describe their situation, it seems like it'd be extremely tempting for them to get together with their neighbors and remove the migrants by force. So many miles of empty desert and ranch land, combined with the sheer volume of migrants, would probably leave Border Patrol stretched too thin to get a handle on the situation before the damage was done.

I should have brought this up sooner. Should we demand that lolwut provide information about these ranchers? Should we dox them and provide their information to the FBI and the DHS? It's weird, because here we have somebody providing evidence that it's "extremely tempting" for people to launch attacks on migrants on American soil, and I'm going to guess that those statements were made with a straight face. Is our disregarding this naive at best, feigning ignorance at worst? How did this fly under the radar during this discussion?

This is less me saying "we should do something about this" and more me emphasizing that there's a reason most people don't do something about it. I wanted to clarify that quickly! I think you're fine, lolwut.
 
Last edited:
What, you don't think getting whisked away by the Mob is stressful?
I figured in this case it was trying to manage a number of disappointed members who are very upset that shit is going sideways. That Biden is turning out to be a disaster instead of a boon.

Would be the death of anyone.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: ditto
Maybe they're right and some of you deserve it. Just saying. You're bitching and whining and making everything difficult for normal people that just want to live their lives. Get your shot and chill the fuck out.
No.

And if I deserve it, then, well, maybe they deserve what I think they have coming to them.

Which is an end to their easy, comfortable, instant gratification lives.
 

I wanted to elaborate on this. It's not that the judge is ignoring Biden, it's that the CDC's extension doesn't have a lot of legal merit and Biden doesn't have the authority whether you're paying attention to him or not. A higher court ruled that the CDC didn't have the authority to extend it, and it's a legal slam dunk considering the Supreme Court's decision on it. It'll have to go to the Supreme Court for a final resolution, but we can expect to see injunctions coming in extremely quickly.
 
It'll have to go to the Supreme Court for a final resolution, but we can expect to see injunctions coming in extremely quickly.

Nothing pisses off a judge more than being pulled back from vacation because some dipshit decided to do exactly what they told them not to do.
 
And in a timely fashion, I found an article that goes into a bit more detail about the moratorium:

The Washington Post said:

Opinion: The CDC’s eviction moratorium is almost certainly illegal​

Americans behind on their rent payments may have cheered when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced Tuesday a new eviction moratorium for most of the nation, this one set to last until October. With some 6 million people owing back rent, many of them victims of covid-19’s sudden economic damage, there is little doubt about the need for aid, particularly because people are about to be thrown out of their homes just as disease rates are climbing.

But the CDC’s action was almost certainly illegal. Under pressure from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and progressive Democrats, President Biden and the CDC may have muted accusations that they failed to stick up for desperate renters. The administration also may succeed in giving many Americans a short reprieve from eviction. But perhaps not as long as advertised — because courts may strike it down before October — and at the expense of the rule of law.

The CDC crafted its new moratorium after a previous eviction ban expired last week. The old policy covered the whole country and had been in place since September. But Supreme Court Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh warned in June that the CDC had “exceeded its existing statutory authority by issuing a nationwide eviction moratorium” and that it could not be renewed absent “clear and specific congressional authorization.” Justice Kavanaugh was the crucial fifth vote that stopped the court from immediately striking down the old eviction ban, giving states an extra few weeks to begin distributing some $47 billion in federal rental aid.

The CDC on Tuesday tried to get around this ruling by issuing a new ban that covers only areas “experiencing substantial and high levels of community transmission.” This amounts to 80 percent of counties. Advocates argue that the rise of the delta variant may have changed the court’s thinking and that the new policy is more closely tailored to the worsening public health situation. They also argue that Justice Kavanaugh may uphold another temporary policy while federal rental aid money is still only trickling out.

That is unlikely. The law the CDC relies on to justify its unilateral eviction ban authorizes the agency to impose measures such as “inspection, fumigation, disinfection, sanitation, pest extermination, and destruction of animals,” not to freeze the rental housing market month after month in nearly the entire country. Many landlords are themselves desperate, on the hook to keep up their properties, pay taxes and service loans whether their tenants pay their rent. Justice Kavanaugh in June clearly signaled willingness to disregard their plight — and the law’s limitations — for another few weeks, not months.

It is not the Biden administration’s fault that states have been slow to get federal rental aid to needy Americans. But the administration’s only reasonable options were to push states to get their acts together and to request that Congress give the CDC the authority it needed to reimpose an eviction ban. Indeed, the onus remains on states and localities; they cannot count on the new moratorium, issued on shaky legal ground, to absolve them of responsibility to aid renters.

If the Trump administration had ignored a direct warning from the Supreme Court, Democrats would rightfully line up to condemn the president. Mr. Biden does not get a pass on the rule of law because his heart is in the right place.
(Source)

The truth of the matter is that this was a Congressional failure. If they wanted to extent the moratorium, they needed to pass a law that extended it. The executive branch and the CDC are both massively overstepping their authority to try to make up for a lack of Democratic cohesion and capability, and it's not a stretch to say that this can't end well.
 
Last edited:
1628189096389.png

These guys seem to be choosing a lot of hills to die on.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/biden...34665.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp



1628189368454.png

The administration is going to commit political suicide if they bring back the lockdowns back. I almost wish they do, but there are people I care about who would be negatively impacted by this shit.
https://noqreport.com/2021/08/05/people-are-rebelling-against-lockdowns-masks-worldwide/


1628189781596.png


https://conservativebrief.com/development-gop-47383/?utm_source=CB&utm_medium=ProTrumpNews



1628189404761.png

If this sticks? Then you know the boat is out of control. (Sick bastard, you can always tell by his eyes)

https://welovetrump.com/2021/08/05/..._source=PTN&utm_medium=mixed&utm_campaign=PTN






1628189578103.png

Yeah im sure that's going to rehabilitate your public image bill.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/bill-...34855.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=gp





What, you don't think getting whisked away by the Mob is stressful?
It really say's something this year, that every time someone vaguely political dies I think "who killed em"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back