Chris court appearance

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Like
Reactions: ToxicCatnip and blackboots
Swamp Thing said:
I might be pulling this out of my ass, but I believe records are only publicly accessible in certain states whereas they are publicly sealed in most states. I’m not sure where Virginia falls.
Please correct me if I’m wrong.
Click to expand...
You have to file a freedom of information act request for a fee (FOIA). Unless a judge specifically seals it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ToxicCatnip, Cpl. Long Dong Silver, blackboots and 3 others
Marissa Moira said:
Oh this is easy depending on the state, loads of fucking people want to pick up people/kids who ran away from home because their family "exiled" them due to being trans.

You just send out a message to one of the known groups if you have computer access and your fucking libtard savior will break many sate and federal rules to get you out.

It's like Last Action hero but with Tommy Tooter instead of Arnold.
Click to expand...
You mean like the time when the Tranch troons put on their retarded bogaloo gear and went behind "enemy lines" to "rescue" another tranny? Imagine that, Chris at the Tranch.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Hongourable Madisha, Nazi Catboi, make_it_so and 1 other person
as i understand it (having been to traffic court and nothing more), a defendant has the right to speak for themself in court, but hearing that chris was able to speak for himself multiple times despite being appointed David Heilberg as his attorney concerns me. obviously you cant prevent someone from blurting out their thoughts, but was there really no objection or prevention of allowing chris to poorly attempt to represent himself in front of a judge during a preliminary hearing?

its is blatantly obvious to even the most candid observer that chris is incapable of reasobly representing himself; should this not warrant some kind of protection? granted, i am not very well versed in how the american legal system operates, but im still somewhat shocked that someone so genuinely incapable of acting within their own best interests is able to impact their own hearing such as chris has without intervention on his own behalf.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, BOLDYSPICY!, IAmNotAlpharius and 5 others
Epic Fedora Man said:
I like to re-watch this video and laugh.
Click to expand...
Screenshot from 2021-08-05 17-45-13.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: ToxicCatnip, spiritofamermaid, Crepidodera fulvicornis and 38 others
COMEDY GOLD!!!!!!
“We’re taking a break so I CAN MAKE A LITTLE NOISE IF I WANT TO!!!!!”
 
kebab4you said:
There's almost 50 pages already, don't think I saw a highlighted comment about it. The toys Chris mentioned is it perhaps the once he bought with the money he stole from Barb?
Click to expand...
Wouldn't be surprised. I also wouldn't be surprised if Chris thought the scenario would play out like one of his badly-written comics, where the cops would escort him to the house, Chris grabs whatever crap he could and tries to escape to CWCville either by punching through the wall to break the 'Iron Curtain' or jump out of a window. Both resulting in complete failure, of course, because Chris is about as incognito as a raging tornado.

Too bad that, while Virginia is for Virgins, it's certainly not for Retards.

On a side note, that lawyer better keep a roll of duct tape handy. Chris's foot can only take so much bullets before it's an outright bleeding stump.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc, blackboots and 8 others
catcatcat said:
as i understand it (having been to traffic court and nothing more), a defendant has the right to speak for themself in court, but hearing that chris was able to speak for himself multiple times despite being appointed David Heilberg as his attorney concerns me. obviously you cant prevent someone from blurting out their thoughts, but was there really no objection or prevention of allowing chris to poorly attempt to represent himself in front of a judge during a preliminary hearing?

its is blatantly obvious to even the most candid observer that chris is incapable of reasobly representing himself; should this not warrant some kind of protection? granted, i am not very well versed in how the american legal system operates, but im still somewhat shocked that someone so genuinely incapable of acting within their own best interests is able to impact their own hearing such as chris has without intervention on his own behalf.
Click to expand...
Chris was supposed to talk about his bond plan but asked about his shit instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToxicCatnip, spiritofamermaid, blackboots and 2 others
catcatcat said:
as i understand it (having been to traffic court and nothing more), a defendant has the right to speak for themself in court, but hearing that chris was able to speak for himself multiple times despite being appointed David Heilberg as his attorney concerns me. obviously you cant prevent someone from blurting out their thoughts, but was there really no objection or prevention of allowing chris to poorly attempt to represent himself in front of a judge during a preliminary hearing?

its is blatantly obvious to even the most candid observer that chris is incapable of reasobly representing himself; should this not warrant some kind of protection? granted, i am not very well versed in how the american legal system operates, but im still somewhat shocked that someone so genuinely incapable of acting within their own best interests is able to impact their own hearing such as chris has without intervention on his own behalf.
Click to expand...
Welcome to America, the cops often get mentally ill people to confess to all sorts of crimes, many of them made up or just cold cases they need solved. They fucking love retards like Chris who are too stupid to keep their mouth shut.
If he didn’t say anything he might’ve walked, depending on what the rape kit said, if they even processed it.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ToxicCatnip, spiritofamermaid, Nguyen Van Phuoc and 10 others
StraightShooter2 said:
I've heard of some prisoners - though usually in Europe getting game consoles in their cells - possibly as a result of good behavior. Though I think this is unlikely to happen for Chris.
Click to expand...
R (7).jpeg

You might be surprised to learn that some prison inmates in the United States have access to video games. Of course, your gaming experience inside of prison walls is completely different from the free world.

Inmates do not have access to XBox, Playstation, or any other gaming console. Instead, many inmates play video games via inmate tablets. Prisons throughout the United States are starting inmate tablet programs, with some DOCs providing their inmates with tablets for free, and others allowing inmates to buy the tablets from the commissary.

The companies who provide these tablets, JPay and GTL, don’t share what kind of games are available. But, from those I have talked to, the games that are available are simple phone games like Solitaire. The sad thing is that the price for tablet games in prison can be as much as $10, so many inmates can’t afford it or aren’t willing to spend that kind of money for a game.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: ToxicCatnip, spiritofamermaid, Linoone and 9 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back