This has been said, but it must be repeated due to how true it is: men who castrate themselves to regrow some lost hair instead of just shaving the rest off are so fucking insecure lol.
men with low DHT are depressed, suicidal
I think they're more likely depressed and suicidal because they realize
1) they traded their ability to sustain an erection for a slight improvement of their bald spot,
2) their wife is definitely fucking another man who wasn't insecure enough to self-castrate, and
3) they've become, and I'm quoting you here, "mentally weak, passive little bitches".
However, I would argue that finasteride has a positive effect upon mankind because it encourages and enables the self-appointment of Darwin Awards. If a man is such a cuck that he would basically chop off his nuts to feel better about his hair, then I think it's not a bad idea to just let him do it. Do we really need him to be able to reproduce and make more children who will either become insecure losers obsessed with their outward appearance of masculinity, or even complete psychopaths who boil hamsters for fun? Objectively, we do not.
Finasteride is a miracle drug that removes cucks from the population. Some people are cucks. Some of those cucks choose to rub finasteride on their testicles I guess. Sometimes, finasteride renders those cucks less able to make more of themselves. I see nothing wrong with this.
I posted this before the roll back but posting it again because fuck it:
I think after applying tinfoil to my head that the reason Daddy J hasn't done anything, not even contacted Null to take shit down, and is just quietly changing his social media handles slightly is because of a leak that occurred that might get him in hot water.
I don't recall where it was, but in one of the discord leaks Bella was talking to I think
Louis Alice about how her dad watched a guy going into a basement in South America and eventually was able to figure out he was a high ranking drug cartel guy, and then I believe she said he killed him.
Classified info is strange and has years attached to it. Some its 10, some go up to 70 with the idea that you'll be dead before you can talk about it. If this was something still under a classified period there is a good/decent chance that Mike told her something he shouldn't have, which happens with agents more than you'd think, and he doesn't want to draw any attention to anything.
EDIT: I found it. These details are specific enough that if it was classified this would be a big problem that he told her, and then it got leaked to the world at large.
View attachment 2448889
I can't comment specifically on any existing or nonexistent investigation by the Federal Government of the United States into certain individuals mentioned here resulting from conversations I potentially did or did not have with a Federal Agent who I am somewhat friendly with. I may or may not be currently forbidden from revealing information by an agreed upon legal gag order, and anyway if the Federal Government were indeed involved (which I cannot legally confirm), I would not have access to much of their inside goings-on since I myself am not a Federal Agent of the Bureau which may or may not be investigating this topic I cannot confirm anything about.
However, there are some things I can speak freely about, concerning a theoretical set of individuals who are not related to anyone in this thread. The disclosure of such information, if relevant and true, is a potential threat to national security. There are some serious potential ramifications for this, as well as compounding factors.
1) Operations in South America, if they have been carried out with US military assets (I will not comment on this), would be classified beyond your godly belief due to their sensitivity. This is not only for the usual reasons like public perception and international relations, but also because reprisals against operators are fairly common when dealing with major drug cartels, who have the resources to hire assassins, bribe relevant individuals, and so on. A US operator recounting the tales of his work to his child as a sanitized adventure is not good, but may be let go for various reasons; however, disclosing specific highly classified information to a child which is then regurgitated with equally specific numbers and such things to a large group is a huge breach of security.
2) Who the individual in question was discussing sensitive information with could be of major concern. For example, if there was someone from, say, Niger, or Algeria, in the chat during the disclosure of sensitive information relating to national security, this may have a serious impact on the scope of any potential investigation. Doubly so if the individual was feeding such information directly to the foreign national in the context of the original chat.
3) Rooming with said foreign national while committing the above acts. If anything were uncovered about the foreign national in question that implied he or she were feeding information back home, or that he or she had connections to any group that might have interests in obtaining US secrets, things would get very ugly.
4) Alleged contact with a known cybercriminal while vomiting classified secrets is on its own a dangerous issue.
These are all comments about a theoretical set of individuals, to whom my legal order to shut the hell up and not talk about potential investigations by any Federal Bureau does not apply.
In unrelated news, the unrelated person, Isabella Loretta Janke, has toenail fungus. It's gross.
