Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

It’s a common sex fantasy for troons who don’t pass.

Which is hilarious and horrifying because it seems like a really good way to get killed.

A few years ago, Labelle was literally sending younger, naive troons out to die by encouraging them to pick up random men for sex without disclosing they’re trans. He claimed it was “empowering.”
I think part of Sophia's fantasy is to completely fool a man(They can't) that they're a woman(they're not) with his 'feminine charm'; and once they're all alone they undress and the dude is just so fuckin' turned on they don't care it's a poorly passing troon. The 'empowering' part is managing to convince even one person that they're female.
 
Which is hilarious and horrifying because it seems like a really good way to get killed.
It’s a narrative trans activists like pushing, but if one actually researches these alleged “transwomyn martyrs,” the gay panic motive is rarely the case. Most of the time the killer already knew the victim was trans and tends to be their drug dealer and/or pimp. The closest I’ve seen to “transphobe murders one night stand after finding out she has a dick” were several news stories where a man was knowingly dating a trans-woman, but didn’t want to get outed and killed his lover after getting blackmailed.

i think in reality, if a straight guy found out his hookup was trans, he would just tell them to fuck off and leave instead of slicing them to ribbons.
 
Scuffer.jpg
 
View attachment 2457180
He should know. I’m sure he’s trying to spread it around with anyone that would dare touch him. He strikes me as the scumbag that would rawdog you, then feign ignorance.
 
"Thanks it's dirt"

Sorry I'm a few days late on this one but it just occurred to me that Billy actually thinks people used to dress the way they show in movies. They didn't. Fabric dye was expensive but commonplace. Some colors were more attainable than others but it's not like everyone who wasn't noble went around wearing only brown. All you need to do is look at a couple of paintings from the era.

So now we have a high profile troon trying to make movie costumes historical fact because it backs up his stupid rationalization. His claim is verifiably false but that won't matter a bit. Watch this beige only bullshit become woke orthodoxy. Watch.
 
I think part of Sophia's fantasy is to completely fool a man(They can't) that they're a woman(they're not) with his 'feminine charm'; and once they're all alone they undress and the dude is just so fuckin' turned on they don't care it's a poorly passing troon. The 'empowering' part is managing to convince even one person that they're female.

Sorry I'm a bit late on this one but yes:

transphobic - Copy.jpg



Labelle tried to claim this "really happened" several times. At face value it was to bolster the claim that no one knows who is trans until they're told, but forgetting to have already proudly declared pride in their girldick more than once, meaning that if this happened (and that's a pretty big if) Labelle just admitted to not passing at all, to the point where this partner is shocked that Labelle identifies as a woman and validates that gender identity by saying he's not into women.
Of course Labelle tries to hide this with a few extra words (throw in "trans" and "multiple" and make sure he sounds accusatory instead of hurt that this person they were attracted to presented as a gay male, tricking him into an intimate relationship) but it goes to show how warped Labelle's mindset is: To Labelle, the trans person is the victim here despite the fact that the gay man who is attracted to men was tricked into sleeping with someone who identifies as a woman. He doesn't want a relationship with a woman, so if anything he's being 100% not transphobic, but because by accepting Labelle as a real woman and admitting he isn't attracted to women he's rejecting Labelle, it's now transphobic.
Because that's what it boils down to: when it comes to sex and relationships with people like Labelle, it's about taking away people's right to say "no" to them through guilt, social pressure and manipulation disguised as oppression.

To me this is one of Labelle's most honest, and disgusting, pieces and why I always go on these screeds about how Labelle and the likes are predators for trying to convince people that having "genital preferences" or a set sexuality is wrong because it excludes them.
You're wrong if you like men and accept them as women, you're wrong if you like women and don't want their dick. You will not cannot win this fight. So I don't care how sick anyone is of seeing me write this but I will repeat:
If you do not want a relationship (sexual or otherwise) with someone, you are NEVER wrong for saying no. You owe them NOTHING. They are wrong for trying to use guilt and social pressure to talk you into a relationship you do not want. You are not the bad guy.
No one is entitled to your time or body for ANY reason.
By not respecting your right to say no they are only further proving why saying no was the right choice. Plying you with accusations of bigotry is the same as plying you with liquor; they want to get you into a state where your defenses are down so they can take advantage of you.
There is nothing wrong with not being attracted to someone, to a group of someones, or to EVERYONE. You're not wrong, you're not broken and you don't need to change, especially for someone just seeking validation who clearly has no interest in how you feel about them or anything else.
Okay, rant over.

TLDR; yes you are exactly right about this being Labelle and many trans people's fantasies and exactly what they envision when they say "you can't tell who is trans" and they will use guilt and social pressure (threatening to exclude you from a group because you're" a bigot", or contacting your boss or authority figures to punish you for being "transphobic", things like that) to get you to play along with this fantasy.
 
Sorry I'm a bit late on this one but yes:

View attachment 2460058


Labelle tried to claim this "really happened" several times. At face value it was to bolster the claim that no one knows who is trans until they're told, but forgetting to have already proudly declared pride in their girldick more than once, meaning that if this happened (and that's a pretty big if) Labelle just admitted to not passing at all, to the point where this partner is shocked that Labelle identifies as a woman and validates that gender identity by saying he's not into women.
Of course Labelle tries to hide this with a few extra words (throw in "trans" and "multiple" and make sure he sounds accusatory instead of hurt that this person they were attracted to presented as a gay male, tricking him into an intimate relationship) but it goes to show how warped Labelle's mindset is: To Labelle, the trans person is the victim here despite the fact that the gay man who is attracted to men was tricked into sleeping with someone who identifies as a woman. He doesn't want a relationship with a woman, so if anything he's being 100% not transphobic, but because by accepting Labelle as a real woman and admitting he isn't attracted to women he's rejecting Labelle, it's now transphobic.
Because that's what it boils down to: when it comes to sex and relationships with people like Labelle, it's about taking away people's right to say "no" to them through guilt, social pressure and manipulation disguised as oppression.

To me this is one of Labelle's most honest, and disgusting, pieces and why I always go on these screeds about how Labelle and the likes are predators for trying to convince people that having "genital preferences" or a set sexuality is wrong because it excludes them.
You're wrong if you like men and accept them as women, you're wrong if you like women and don't want their dick. You will not cannot win this fight. So I don't care how sick anyone is of seeing me write this but I will repeat:
If you do not want a relationship (sexual or otherwise) with someone, you are NEVER wrong for saying no. You owe them NOTHING. They are wrong for trying to use guilt and social pressure to talk you into a relationship you do not want. You are not the bad guy.
No one is entitled to your time or body for ANY reason.
By not respecting your right to say no they are only further proving why saying no was the right choice. Plying you with accusations of bigotry is the same as plying you with liquor; they want to get you into a state where your defenses are down so they can take advantage of you.
There is nothing wrong with not being attracted to someone, to a group of someones, or to EVERYONE. You're not wrong, you're not broken and you don't need to change, especially for someone just seeking validation who clearly has no interest in how you feel about them or anything else.
Okay, rant over.

TLDR; yes you are exactly right about this being Labelle and many trans people's fantasies and exactly what they envision when they say "you can't tell who is trans" and they will use guilt and social pressure (threatening to exclude you from a group because you're" a bigot", or contacting your boss or authority figures to punish you for being "transphobic", things like that) to get you to play along with this fantasy.
Billy clearly doesn't know what a vagina looks like.
 
Back