US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
They are pushing the" Trump got booed" thing so hard. Even though he disagreed with some of his crowd, made his point and respected the dissent. What a clown show. God forbid you disagree with the power. Trump can handle disagreement and he says "you have your rights and freedom"; while charlatans try to spin it as a bad thing. The same people that booed are the same people that laughed at his response. There is no issue here. Try again, faggots.
 
For the the polidicks spergs here, I have a genuine question, why did Biden, or his handlers, went along with this withdrawn debacle.

I'm far from a political pundit
Hypothesis: there is no central cabal puppeteering Biden, but competing interests with loose alliances of convenience, if even that much, & what Biden agrees to has increasingly become a tug of war between multiple would-be puppeteers.
 
They are pushing the" Trump got booed" thing so hard. Even though he disagreed with some of his crowd, made his point and respected the dissent. What a clown show. God forbid you disagree with the power. Trump can handle disagreement and he says "you have your rights and freedom"; while charlatans try to spin it as a bad thing. The same people that booed are the same people that laughed at his response. There is no issue here. Try again, faggots.
I wouldn't say he handles disagreement well; he would go on Twitter and complain. However, I can recognize that Trump disagreement is a grift AT BEST and cultist at worst.
 
If the White House is apparently staffed by West Wing LARPers now I wonder how many low level employees in the major cable news networks watched Newsroom and thought 'Wow.... this is literally me!'

Newsroom is widely reviled by the left for a bunch of reasons:

1. The pilot's notorious opening sequence where Sorkin called out the millennial/zoomer as the cancer killing America and the general fair weather patriotism where the left was all gung ho being super patriotic simply because Obama was elected.

2. The main character is basically a milquetoast center right Republican who's the liberal wet dream when it comes to "the dream conservative": pro-gay, anti-gun, pro-drug,and anti-religious right and who's big thing was/is the fact that he desperately wants to be loved by the shallow NPC rootless cosmopolitan crowd, to the point that his career amounted to running a prime time version of pop culture infotainment when the show starts.

3. A LOT of the storylines kind of shit on the left: the "name a rapist without any proof website" storyline in particular, since it ended with a reporter successfully shaming the webmaster into shutting it down by calling out how she was letting vindictive bitches falsely accuse men of rape and the whole "better to let a hundred guilty men go free than imprison a single innocent man" notion

4. West Wing had a bunch of well known character actors on the show. while Newsroom had a bunch of unknowns as the rank and file reporters who sucked balls, as most of the budget for the show went to cast Waterson, Wilde, Fonda, and Bridges.

5. Finally, Newsroom was a show that actually showed consequences for being a liberal douche; most notably the
"American Taliban" speech put Bridges and his circle on the corporate shit list and they were even, IIRC, barred from being involved in a big 9-11 tenth anniversary retrospective that they were supposed to put together/host.
 
I wouldn't say he handles disagreement well; he would go on Twitter and complain. However, I can recognize that Trump disagreement is a grift AT BEST and cultist at worst.
I think I just spent a full minute trying to parse what the fuck you just said. Wanna do another pass on this to make sense?
 
They are pushing the" Trump got booed" thing so hard. Even though he disagreed with some of his crowd, made his point and respected the dissent. What a clown show. God forbid you disagree with the power. Trump can handle disagreement and he says "you have your rights and freedom"; while charlatans try to spin it as a bad thing. The same people that booed are the same people that laughed at his response. There is no issue here. Try again, faggots.
Honestly, probably should have had more Boo moments while in office. It would have shattered the narrative that the majority of his base are rampant cultists. There is a theory in Magic (like Penn and Teller), that a trick can be too perfect, which leaves people to speculate how the trick was done and usually guess the methodology correctly. In Trump's case, the methodology is Trump Supporters are ravid dogs of the Republican Party.
 
Yeah, even if he is a pedo I would just want him to resign over Afghanistan, his health, or be 25th'd then get outed as a pedo.

More so than a coup or finding smoking gun evidence the election was rigged it would be devastating to the nation. If the leader of the most powerful nation on earth is found to be a pedo, we are done as a nation, domestically and on the international stage.

The Democrat Party getting rekt is not worth that.

tl;dr: We would rage then rebuild.

More like the nation would engage a mode of action never seen since Pearl Harbor. Every pedo supporter would be burned at the stake, every Democrat that ever held power would find out that violating Trump’s 4th Amendment rights to try for an impeachment opened Pandora’s Box: Hard Mode, as all of their electronic devices are searched, literally all of this would happen in a massive wave.

Why? Because the raw anger of the not-Twitter population would be out for blood. If the gov‘t didn’t have the purge then, just to organize the public rage, it would be vigilantism on a massive scale.

Any country that so much as wiggled strangely would be the target of being lashed out at. We wouldn’t be done on the world stage, everyone would wait for us to cool down. You do not ever poke a raging bear. The government would literally just use any saber rattlers as an excuse target to let the anger be vented.

It would be devastating, but it would also confirm in the public’s mind that fraud had to happen in order to cover up this evil. It wouldn’t matter anymore what proof we did or did not have. People would just declare fraud, point to the fact that he was covering the fact that he’s a pedo, which is why fraud happened, then work to reclaim lost honor. Wouldn’t hurt as much as you think it would in the long run, but the short run would be a nightmare.
 
I think I just spent a full minute trying to parse what the fuck you just said. Wanna do another pass on this to make sense?
I'm trying to say that I do not believe Trump CAN handle disagreement if his Twitter rants are anything to go by. However, many of Trump's detractors and critics are batshit crazy with their hatred toward him, it's cultlike. So, I suppose Trump's handling of disagreement can be justified.
 
So which GOP bootlicker do you think Kamala will pick as "reconciliation"?
Null our stickers here in this board are insufficient.

Romney's the safe bet since it's clear he probably thinks the left owes him one for stabbing Trump in the back during impeachment.

But I seriously doubt they will go reconciliation-wise since Biden being 25thAed will kill the Democrats for at least a generation. They'll want to ramrod as much of the anti-life agenda throw that they can in the short time they'll have left before the 2022 elections, let alone 2024 if by some miracle the Democrats don't get swept out of control of Congress.

Why are they afraid of challenging a dementia patient who falls up stairs?
He has powerful friends and backers, who are not ready to kick Biden to the curb. Any aide who defies/challenges Biden, let alone to his face, will have their career destroyed if they are lucky and at worse, killed or blood libeled in a way to make it impossible for them to even get a non-government job if not outright framed/sent to prison to make an example out of them.
 
They are pushing the" Trump got booed" thing so hard. Even though he disagreed with some of his crowd, made his point and respected the dissent. What a clown show. God forbid you disagree with the power. Trump can handle disagreement and he says "you have your rights and freedom"; while charlatans try to spin it as a bad thing. The same people that booed are the same people that laughed at his response. There is no issue here. Try again, faggots.
I think he handle it better than Jill Biden getting booed offstage. Your right his based didn't seem to mind.
Honestly, probably should have had more Boo moments while in office. It would have shattered the narrative that the majority of his base are rampant cultists. There is a theory in Magic (like Penn and Teller), that a trick can be too perfect, which leaves people to speculate how the trick was done and usually guess the methodology correctly. In Trump's case, the methodology is Trump Supporters are ravid dogs of the Republican Party.
You maybe on to something. It would have really throw the cultists narrative out the window
 
The CDC's Hurricane Preparation Guidelines.
1629686054927.png
 
They are pushing the" Trump got booed" thing so hard. Even though he disagreed with some of his crowd, made his point and respected the dissent. What a clown show. God forbid you disagree with the power. Trump can handle disagreement and he says "you have your rights and freedom"; while charlatans try to spin it as a bad thing. The same people that booed are the same people that laughed at his response. There is no issue here. Try again, faggots.
All the base wants is not to be lectured. Cut to all the GOPe town halls with Crenshaw or Romney who got petulant while giving speeches about how there was no funny business in the election and got booed and argued with. Put down your microphone and listen. If the base is completely wrong and unhinged, it's still your job to listen to them and assuage their fears, either by talking to them like adults and convincing them or compromising and agreeing to push policies that will prevent future uncertainty and restore their trust in the system. Everyone else treats the voters like idiots, and Trump spins it like, "Hey, if I'm wrong, you can laugh at me, but I'm pretty confident in it." The end. That convinces people because you're treating them like your friends, not cattle that have to be prodded into something.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back