Ethan Ralph's December 16th, 2020 Revenge Porn Arrest & Trial - Trial outcome: Ralph pled No Contest, was found guilty and has a 1yr suspended sentence (not probation).

What will happen?

  • Plea deal with no jail time

    Votes: 56 25.0%
  • Plea deal with jail time

    Votes: 44 19.6%
  • Guilty with no jail time

    Votes: 31 13.8%
  • Guilty with jail time

    Votes: 37 16.5%
  • Not guilty, alawgs btfo'd, Can't Abort the Retort!

    Votes: 33 14.7%
  • Ralph aborts himself

    Votes: 19 8.5%
  • Other (explain in post)

    Votes: 4 1.8%

  • Total voters
    224
  • Poll closed .
You are correct, but I assume he lapses into stupor in that Keemstar streamer chair when he's done coping and seething and just lolls over the side and vomits on the floor. He'd have been dead long ago if otherwise.
Just gotta wait till the gas lift ruptures and sends a twisted shard of steel through his colon and intestines and slowly poisons him from the inside with his own leaking shit.
 
Just gotta wait till the gas lift ruptures and sends a twisted shard of steel through his colon and intestines and slowly poisons him from the inside with his own leaking shit.
Such is the life of a coprophile, but that won't be the death of him. He's eaten enough shit to be immune to that sort of thing.
 
Well ladies and guntlemen, I bring great news. Despite Ralph claiming there were "no special circumstances" listed on page 1 of like 3 of the dispensation paperwork, and despite claiming the case wasn't nolle prosequi'd but rather was dismissed outright, I can now confirm to you lovely people that indieed, Ethan Ralph's charges for revenge porn for releasing the sex tape of Faith have been reinstated. His arraignment was held 13 August 2021, his next court date is 10 September.

If only we can get CWC a day release so we can get him to go and jeer on stream at the GUNTSER as he's led away in handcuffs.
 
Explains the impotent rage he’s been having. And the whole leaking images of his own son to get back at Faith.

I thought Ralph was a opportunist and a retard since gamergate, but I don’t think anyone could have expected this bountiful of a harvest. He one ups himself every other week, it’s glorious.
 
Well ladies and guntlemen, I bring great news. Despite Ralph claiming there were "no special circumstances" listed on page 1 of like 3 of the dispensation paperwork, and despite claiming the case wasn't nolle prosequi'd but rather was dismissed outright, I can now confirm to you lovely people that indieed, Ethan Ralph's charges for revenge porn for releasing the sex tape of Faith have been reinstated. His arraignment was held 13 August 2021, his next court date is 10 September.

His lawyer mostly focus's on DUI's. Of course he's back.

This man has spent more time in court than with his newborn child, and not because he's fighting the custody
He'd never be able to afford it. We all know what he brings in now. He would need 1000% more than that minimum. Plus his jail time and criminal history would fuck him over in a custody battle.
 
His lawyer mostly focus's on DUI's. Of course he's back.
The lawyer had nothing to do with it. The case had ended with everything fixed for Ralph. All he had to do was not be an absolute utter fuckup for probably a year. And obviously, that is beyond him.
 
So I’ve not seen it written here anywhere as to why these charges were coming back so I can only speculate.

I find the re-emergence of Chris Kerr to be especially interesting, with Faith’s dad threatening child porn charges. I wonder if it was a back door deal between the Kerrs (his mom-Chris’s mom- seemed pretty upset and desperate) and the Vickers- Chris takes off the dildo hat, puts in a tie, and cooperates with the police; up to and including testifying; and he doesn’t press the charges. Or, at least, if the prosecution does then Faith doesn’t have to cooperate.
I just find it very curious timing indeed that all those Chris Kerr texts and emails with Faith drop (with none of them predating the gunt tape iirc, those which could embarrass both Faith and Chris) and with threats of child porn/grooming/ wtf ever charges and then this case gets reopened.

Tldr this stinks of a Vickers’s autistic game of “4d cHeSs” and I suspect it will blow up in his face like all the other times. This kind of “dangling shit over people’s heads and making them hurt, upset and nervous for long periods of time” is a more sophisticated way for Faith to manipulate and I can see her getting into it (as evidenced by the Chris’s mom/Faith texts). Fuck it though, I’m here for the popcorn.

edit do y’all think reopening this is why he leaked those pics of Xander? If there’s a restraining order in place couldn’t that fuck him up as well?
 
Tldr this stinks of a Vickers’s autistic game of “4d cHeSs” and I suspect it will blow up in his face like all the other times. This kind of “dangling shit over people’s heads and making them hurt, upset and nervous for long periods of time” is a more sophisticated way for Faith to manipulate and I can see her getting into it (as evidenced by the Chris’s mom/Faith texts). Fuck it though, I’m here for the popcorn.
I'm inclined to agree in my speculation.
That Faith both conceived and is currently raising Ralph's child should have taught Mr. Vickers that he can't strategize his way out of a paper bag. There aren't any heroes in this story, though, so it'll be interesting to see how it plays out. I only hope Xander doesn't suffer in the crossfire.
 
Is the dissemination charge going to be considered a sex offence?
Yes but not apparently one that you need to register for unless it involves a minor or it's a third offense. It's listed in § 9.1-902 and the dissemination charge is § 18.2-386.2.

. . .or a third or subsequent conviction of § 18.2-67.4, § 18.2-67.4:2, subsection C of § 18.2-67.5, § 18.2-386.1, or, if the offense was committed on or after July 1, 2020, § 18.2-386.2.

The language is a little gnarly, to the point I initially read the "third or subsequent conviction" as only applying to the language leading up to "or, if the offense was committed on. . ." but considering normal drafting rules, I think it probably applies to the § 18.2-386.2 charge too. Who knows? An ambitious prosecutor could argue otherwise and baffle the court with bullshit.
 
Back