US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
My money is on Kamala, Jill is such a lazy second wife and as far as I am aware, she didn't even have any retarded kids for the zombie.
Kamala has sucked the sort dicks that would haunt your dreams. Old, unwashed, semiflacid Dem dicks... I hate her, but she would eat that Biden Bitch for breakfast.
Whoever loses, we win.
 
I'm genuinely starting to wonder if a lot of people simply don't know who the Taliban are or what they do.

Or maybe they've been in their woke bubbles for so long that they think they are talk their way into forcing everyone to be more inclusive?

This is the Canadian Minister for Women and Gender Equality revealing that she's not quite informed as to what values the Taliban have for women.

View attachment 2478974

View attachment 2478975
hahahah...I can't wait to see these 'all muslims are good, refugee whalecum' saps impale themselves like this. then again, in a few years of Taliban rule of Afghanistan I'm also willing to bet all the leftist revisionists will start pretending like they were always the good guys, cuz america bad and sexist ergo they must be good.
 
I've been hate-scrolling Twitter for the last day. What reality do these halfwits live in?
View attachment 2478943
Bait or not, you have to remember a lot of liberals genuinely believed 'reality has a liberal bias' which tribalism eventually transforms into 'liberals are always ultimate lawful good or simply flawed but well-meaning at worst'. To them, a truly fair media would just constantly shit on Republicans 24/7 so any deviation from that is pernicious bothsidesism to give off the impression of being 'fair' to disgusting mayo ghouls that don't deserve it anyway. And yes, you can accuse Team Red of this too but they've approached the media from a completely different angle for the last few decades now so it's not a 1 to 1 comparison.
 
Communist Gestapo...ACTIVATE

1629909577633.png
 
hahahah...I can't wait to see these 'all muslims are good, refugee whalecum' saps impale themselves like this. then again, in a few years of Taliban rule of Afghanistan I'm also willing to bet all the leftist revisionists will start pretending like they were always the good guys, cuz america bad and sexist ergo they must be good.
I've speculated that the next Hitler would be Muslim. As far as I can tell, it's the only group that has the will to expand and oppose globohomo. Eastern Europe is only interested in its own borders, MAGA is deadlocked with the courts, and China uses globohomo for its own ends. Islam rejects every tenet of globohomo immediately and cannot be subverted. Now that the US is importing these Muslims, they now have access to new audiences to appeal to an increasingly disaffected, consoomer population.
 
I've speculated that the next Hitler would be Muslim. As far as I can tell, it's the only group that has the will to expand and oppose globohomo. Eastern Europe is only interested in its own borders, MAGA is deadlocked with the courts, and China uses globohomo for its own ends. Islam rejects every tenet of globohomo immediately and cannot be subverted. Now that the US is importing these Muslims, they now have access to new audiences to appeal to an increasingly disaffected, consoomer population.
I don't think they'd ever truly be large enough to straight up turn America into the Islamic Nazi States but I definitely see trad LARPers bandwagoning onto them next.
 
I've speculated that the next Hitler would be Muslim. As far as I can tell, it's the only group that has the will to expand and oppose globohomo. Eastern Europe is only interested in its own borders, MAGA is deadlocked with the courts, and China uses globohomo for its own ends. Islam rejects every tenet of globohomo immediately and cannot be subverted. Now that the US is importing these Muslims, they now have access to new audiences to appeal to an increasingly disaffected, consoomer population.
We're importing the most liberal Muslims in Afghanistan (with maybe a few undercover Jihadis), not the deeply religious ones. Those go to Europe.
 
I've speculated that the next Hitler would be Muslim. As far as I can tell, it's the only group that has the will to expand and oppose globohomo. Eastern Europe is only interested in its own borders, MAGA is deadlocked with the courts, and China uses globohomo for its own ends. Islam rejects every tenet of globohomo immediately and cannot be subverted. Now that the US is importing these Muslims, they now have access to new audiences to appeal to an increasingly disaffected, consoomer population.

I would disagree - Islam is schismatic by design. It was founded on disagreement with who the true heirs of the caliphate are, and continued to divide from there. That's why they're such effective terrorists, they're already used to dividing into cells who only know as much as they need to in order to justify their purpose. I do not believe any one Muslim can hold enough power to become a proper Hitler, because there will always be ten other Muslims with -almost- as much power as that one, and they believe their specific Islam is the correct Islam.

Now, the best way to make a new Hitler is with something not nearly as capricious as religious thought and belief, something more dogmatic than religion. Socialism/Communism? Why, there's never been a deeper well to draw from. You could say Xi Jinping is already doing the job, given the genocide and the continued CCP agenda of ensuring all of their citizens believe they are ethnically "Han" despite that being an ethnicity from over 2000 years ago, and the Chinese across the entire country having been raped and pillaged by steppe peoples to the point that they're the muddiest gene pool in the world. Much like "Aryans", the Han have no basis of existence in the 21st century. China is great at making Hitlers.
 
Frankly, any man who would choose the above over this is not choosing on the basis of physical attraction, that's for certain.
Monica had bedroom eyes. I personally don't doubt she suggested a lot of the kinky play that went on between she and Bill, rather than him being an absolute "predator". Hillary always struck me as a begrudgingly missionary, ok get off me now, Bill type. Yes, he was a womanizer but when when you look at the trail of crumpled bedsheets, I have to believe that many of the women were initially attracted to him because of power. I'm certain Monica got quite cigar soaking wet BJ-ing the most powerful man in the world (at the time) in the White House itself. The "Oh, I'm a helpless intern girl and he seduced me!" shit came well after the fact. She knew exactly what she was doing and seduced him and made herself very available to him, although you can't really seduce the willing.

Monica should really count her blessings she didn't commit Clintoncide.
 
I'm a helpless intern girl and he seduced me!" shit came well after the fact. She knew exactly what she was doing and seduced him and made herself very available to him, although you can't really seduce the willing.
Considering that she kept that cum stained dress in it's cum stained state... yeah, the 'helpless intern' was an act.
 
Do the mentally retarded actually count as -people- though?

I hope so!

Some women are quite attractive if they're chubby, especially if their extra bulk manifests in the thighs, bust, rear, and yes, even belly. But that delicate balance hinges on that woman still having the general shape of a voluptuous woman, and if that woman has a face like Palpatine crossed with the Crypt Keeper, then that's a no-go from me.

But what about her personality? I'd have to reject any woman with that much blood on her hands, regardless of any physical factors.
 
Monica Lewinsky, frankly, was never an attractive woman. With fame and a lot of professional make up she today achieves 'inoffensiveness' but look at her back at the time:
View attachment 2478972
See I think he fucked Monica because she is everything Hilary wasn't, (too) young, healthy, happy, joyful. Like compare her to Hilary and Jennifer (or was it Jessica?) Flowers, its like comparing salty crackers to a ripe melon.
 
Monica had bedroom eyes.
I mean, unlike Hillary's they're not a window into a soulless void, but I wouldn't call them "come to bed" eyes. More like "you don't have to buy me dinner" eyes. And she also has "accidentally circumcise you teeth".

In any case, her willingness or otherwise is not relevant to the issue of Bill Clinton lying about his relationship to a witness. Nor, really to her relative physical attractiveness to Hillary. Bill Clinton almost certainly raped at least some women who declined to do the deed willingly. Hillary's bedroom skills I decline to speculate upon.
 
I've speculated that the next Hitler would be Muslim. As far as I can tell, it's the only group that has the will to expand and oppose globohomo. Eastern Europe is only interested in its own borders, MAGA is deadlocked with the courts, and China uses globohomo for its own ends. Islam rejects every tenet of globohomo immediately and cannot be subverted. Now that the US is importing these Muslims, they now have access to new audiences to appeal to an increasingly disaffected, consoomer population.

I have personally heard some fellow white men talk about how they think Islam may have a point with how degenerate and debased most of the urban areas of the US have become.

These have been rural people, mind you.
 
So this is a weird tangent but yes, Hillary was passably attractive in a Manson acolyte sort of way at college
View attachment 2478957View attachment 2478970

and became more so when she was a bit older and entered her Scary Ally McBeal phase..


View attachment 2478960View attachment 2478969

She has of course now entered her Emperor Palpatine / Countess Bathory phase and I can't see anyone other than Norman Bates being drawn to her, but hey - each their own.

Monica Lewinsky, frankly, was never an attractive woman. With fame and a lot of professional make up she today achieves 'inoffensiveness' but look at her back at the time:
View attachment 2478972

Frankly, any man who would choose the above over this

View attachment 2478973

is not choosing on the basis of physical attraction, that's for certain.

And indeed Bill Clinton was not. He is a sexual predator who has sexually molested a lot of women. (Several of whom Trump hilariously brought to the debate).

At the time of the Lewinsky affair I had no other sources of news and had the impression that the case was solely about a consensual affair and took the view that whatever it may say about Bill's character, it wasn't really a commentary on his qualities as president and not a court matter. It's only looking back as an adult that I find it was actually about a sexual assault case and Lewinksy was a witness. It wasn't about him sleeping with her but about him lying about the nature of his relationship to a witness. That changed my view on things a lot and it's frightening how many people still have the view on the case that I did at the time.

Also, mouth organ? That'll be our Monica.
I think not only did Hillary hit the wall she damn near invented it.
 
Considering that she kept that cum stained dress in it's cum stained state... yeah, the 'helpless intern' was an act.
He could have got out of so much trouble if he'd just told the court it was HIS dress.

See I think he fucked Monica because she is everything Hilary wasn't, (too) young, healthy, happy, joyful...
Living?
 
But what about her personality? I'd have to reject any woman with that much blood on her hands, regardless of any physical factors.
Oh, totally. For me at least, a woman's character is the make-or-break point for me to find them attractive. As "professional-looking" and "friendly-grandmother-esque" Hillary may make herself out to be in public, the fact that she is behind so many shady and controversial political and social developments would be far too significant for me to simply ignore it. In simpler terms, a chubby woman with a complex, compelling, and approachable character is made that much more beautiful by the way they act. Conversely, a woman with the physique of a professional-model, but is as approachable as a barracuda in a Waffen-SS uniform, is ugly to me.

This is getting a bit off-topic, let's rectify that: Do you think it could be possible that Jill Biden will try to run for President at some point, in similar vein to how Hillary used both the experiences of Bill and of herself as a foundation for her "credibility" to hold public office?
 
What has really been bugging me is the rumours that the G7 meeting only took 12 minutes.

That is a really short time for a meeting of 7 leaders, unless there is nothing to talk about and there is already consensus on everything. I find it unlikely that there was nothing to talk about since at least 5 of the countries are openly worried about having citizens left behind enemy lines.

This can surely not help diplomatic relations between US and the other G7 members.
Politico had an article where the G7 found out that everything they were to debate had in fact already been decided. The only thing left was to ask Biden to ask the Taliban for more time.
Because most of them use it and it is such a reliable echo chamber they get high on their own farts. No, seriously. That is legit the reason. I have peers working for them that have been trying for years now to get them to stop doing it to no avail.


To explain one of the knock-on effects of importance for keeping this clusterfuck going: Whenever a large group of the general populace sit up and take notice, a section of them will never sit back down. Its newly minted ideological partisans, always in opposition to the group that caused them to take notice. This is very important when you pair it with the fact the overwhelming majority of people get their news through word-of-mouth.

It creates a feedback loop that can keep this shit going for years. Someone takes notice, has the revelation his once cozy world is actually -fucked-, and now they cannot go back to how they were. This person will now listen to everything they can, voraciously eating up information, and then -spreading that information- to those in his social circle. They become lotus points of information, spreading out from them and far more able to start the rippling word-of-mouth. This wakes up more people, and it just becomes a perpetuating cycle both keeping the issue going and making more hardened opposition to whatever got the populace's attention.

Again, not picking you apart, I'm just going to place my 'lack-of-faith-in-humanity' tracing paper over your experience and draw some lines, listed for ease, not reddit arrogance.

1. Inflation is going up, and here's why that's a good thing. "Here's why that's a good thing" is a meme for a reason
2. January 6th, 2 (3?) impeachments, russian piss tapes, grab em by the pussy, Hillary Emails, Podesta is a pedo, hunters laptop, foreign policy ignored during the debates, soft-ball questions to Biden...
3. Fair enough
4. You're right, we've done that bit.
5. The enemy of my enemy must be my friend. Does Joe have more enemies than Kamala has friends
6. I don't believe they have, but i AM a conspiracy theorist retard, and would not put a false-flag (at worst) or over-highlighting a natural problem (at best) to recharge their balls, ready to blow more loads.
7. I can't think of a time in my life time that this has occurred in the west, physically or metaphorically. The closest example would be Saville as a scapegoat? Maybe?

Not to play devils advocate, but im totally going to play devils advocate. Fox news??!?! those alt-right Trump supporters?

The left won't be supported in 2022 no matter what, that isn't the long-term or big picture game. 2022 goes to repubs, repubs win in 2024, dems win in 2028, ready to roll out the great reset. I honestly believe this.


Only 28% of America trust the media, according to the media? I won't disagree though, you're closer to the numbers than I am.

I would give this a rainbow, but I'm a pessimist so a rainbow may be a little too much. You have a lot of faith in the people, and that's good and I hope that faith pays off, for both of us. I just can't get on board the idea that the same braindead wingnuts who have believe some right old horse shit, would now not believe in blatant horse-shit. Again, COVID, how many times did we see "X isn't going to happen, it's a conspiracy theory" only for X to happen? And every time, and even now, people are believing the same old horse shit. Maybe politically motivated people are more open-minded?

You're closer to the ground than I am on this topic and a lot more experienced/knowledgeable in general. I'll wait in anticipation to see what happens.
To some up the arguments that I think you are saying.

HymanHive believes the Status Quo will assert itself once the media gets its pound of flesh.

Gehenna believes that things are too unstable and getting back to the status quo will be impossible.

I'm leaning with Gehenna because supply shortages are going to grind everything to a halt sooner rather than later.
Come on! Speed up! I last slept 24 hours ago and I still have 8 hours of work left minimum! Out do me in manic crackhead energy!
View attachment 2478825
So this is why there were 5 pages since I loaded this morning. And the thirty yesterday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back