Gimmick Account Twitter / '_________' posting their Ls/Ws / '_________' Out of Context - Unnecessary soapboxes, e-begging, >not posting on main, terminally online posters, "You are blocked from following _______"

I looked at The Reply Seeker's account and not only was it dogshit, I couldn't understand what the gimmick was supposed to be at all.

Archiving his face reveal because he's literally a wonky faced pedo.
Here is a screenshot of the tweet just in case:
the reply seeker.png
 
Wait. Did he ever actually even meet this girl IRL, ever? It’s bizarre to see people saying they are dating or in a relationship but have never actually met the person IRL and all of their interactions happened over an ISP.

Who knows, but in this twitlong he says as follows:
1629915707880.png

"She looked".
So, he saw her.
 
"He's not a pedo. He's just the most oblivious autistic man-child retard to ever live and was so emotionally invested that he was willing to become a pedo, okay?!"
To be fair, he ran a twitter gimmick account so he's clearly autistic and retarded. The question is, "is he that autistic and retarded or is he just a creep?"
 
Idk about you niggas but if I was courting a gal and she was typing LIKE A THIRTEEN YEAR OLD, I would ditch that shit immediately. It's not like a 17 vs 18 argument. This shit is weird and we only have what this dude admitted to.
Somebody (who?) being a pedo on twitter is not feature worthy though, in my opinion.
 
This might be a bit of a hot take, but i don't think he is a pedo: i think he's just retarded, and immature . He didn't know she was 13 when they started out, so he wasn't seeking that, he just was too emotionally invested in an online relationship he thought was real so tried to ignore reality.
If you're talking to a kid in a sexual manner, but you honestly didn't know they were a kid and cut contact when you found out, then no. You're not a pedophile. However, if you continue to talk to that kid after finding out their age, and say shit like
"I knew she was thirteen, but I just loved her so much I ignored it"
:story:
Then you're a certified pedo, pal!
 
Who knows, but in this twitlong he says as follows:
View attachment 2479223
"She looked".
So, he saw her.
Ohhh, pedo math. Never gets old.
In any case, I have zero doubts that if he saw the child, he has saved images of her. Internet freak pedos that seek out their victims online are definitely CP collectors, so while I obviously don’t hope that he promoted sexual photos from the victim, I do hope there’s an investigation and I hope he gets busted for something more prosecutable like possession of CP. As it stands, creeping on children online makes for a disgustingly light sentence if a conviction can even be made.
 
For real though, I don't understand how we've reached a point where people think it's even ok for children to hang out online where they're being exposed to god only knows who. If this was a physical location nobody would think that was copacetic, but hey, the kids will whine if you try to take away their electronics and it's hard to find other things for them to do, so may as well just shrug and let them be preyed on and irreparably warped by an internet that regularly messes up even grown adults.
There was like a short era there where people actually tried to set up closed, restricted internet safety zones for the kiddos, but for some reason these went the way of the dodo along with inexpensive, limited "kid friendly" electronics. Now they just get their own brand-new iPhone where they're free to roam the depths of YouTube and Twitter, unsupervised, and nobody seems to have much of a problem with this. It's bizarre.
 
Back