- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For a novelty I'm actually tangentially aware of this shit as a result of a series called Seven Periods With Mr Gormsby. The TLDR is certain tattoos are considered utterly indecent if worn by unsuitable individuals. Think some random scum sauntering around in the Pope's outfit.We must be sure that we’re concerned about all possible cultural insensitivity on behalf of anyone who may be offended.
View attachment 2485048
View attachment 2485049
View attachment 2485050
Have they gotten upset about wendigoes being inaccurately depicted with deer skulls yet?
It'll be interesting to see how they react to antlers. I'm guessing a lot of screaming about cultural appropriation at the very least.Have they gotten upset about wendigoes being inaccurately depicted with deer skulls yet?
I’m an amateur folklorist, so I’m more frustrated about white folks just getting the whole thing wrong. it’s not just that the antlers were invented by a white guy in a 2000s movie (and even then the monster in said movie was a shapeshifter, so imitators got it recursively wrong), but mass market pop culture is also two centuries out of date. Nowadays the wendigo is much bigger and more political in Algonquin cultures. It’s come to be a fullblown Satan/Ahriman-type figure and a symbol of colonialism and capitalist excess. That sounds really interesting, right? But you wouldn’t know any of that from watching b-movies where it’s a generic faux exotic monster to terrorize white people. You’d think anti-white anti-capitalist anti-American Hollywood would be all over that sort of symbolism, giving millions of dollars to Algonquin creators to realize their vision with faux profound statements like “America is the real wendigo”, but no! Instead we get yet another generic b-movie where a generic monster invented by white folks terrorizes white folks and has a foreign name tacked on to make it feel faux exotic (assuming viewers even know the name isn’t native English, and there’s a surprising number of people who don’t know that). The name is so utterly divorced from its roots and Algonquin cultures that I doubt any actually valid sense of cultural appropriation is applicable. A terminal case of cultural ignorance, maybe. We have the internet now, and entire books written about the origins and current cultural context of the wendigo, but still it’s the lies that circle the world.It'll be interesting to see how they react to antlers. I'm guessing a lot of screaming about cultural appropriation at the very least.
Offhand, is there any depiction that doesn't irretrievably fuck it up?I’m an amateur folklorist, so I’m more frustrated about white folks just getting the whole thing wrong. it’s not just that the antlers were invented by a white guy in a 2000s movie (and even then the monster in said movie was a shapeshifter, so imitators got it recursively wrong), but mass market pop culture is also two centuries out of date. Nowadays the wendigo is much bigger and more political in Algonquin cultures. It’s come to be a fullblown Satan/Ahriman-type figure and a symbol of colonialism and capitalist excess. That sounds really interesting, right? But you wouldn’t know any of that from watching b-movies where it’s a generic faux exotic monster to terrorize white people. You’d think anti-white anti-capitalist anti-American Hollywood would be all over that sort of symbolism, giving millions of dollars to Algonquin creators to realize their vision with faux profound statements like “America is the real wendigo”, but no! Instead we get yet another generic b-movie where a generic monster invented by white folks terrorizes white folks and has a foreign name tacked on to make it feel faux exotic (assuming viewers even know the name isn’t native English, and there’s a surprising number of people who don’t know that). The name is so utterly divorced from its roots and Algonquin cultures that I doubt any actually valid sense of cultural appropriation is applicable. A terminal case of cultural ignorance, maybe. We have the internet now, and entire books written about the origins and current cultural context of the wendigo, but still it’s the lies that circle the world.
I actually haven’t been able to find anything outside of an academic context.Offhand, is there any depiction that doesn't irretrievably fuck it up?
I can generally sympathize with people who get frustrated with poorly done or incompetent interpretations of folklore, as opposed to muh cultural appropriation bullshit.
So what was the monster like before its image got taken over by Wokeness?I’m an amateur folklorist, so I’m more frustrated about white folks just getting the whole thing wrong. it’s not just that the antlers were invented by a white guy in a 2000s movie (and even then the monster in said movie was a shapeshifter, so imitators got it recursively wrong), but mass market pop culture is also two centuries out of date. Nowadays the wendigo is much bigger and more political in Algonquin cultures. It’s come to be a fullblown Satan/Ahriman-type figure and a symbol of colonialism and capitalist excess. That sounds really interesting, right? But you wouldn’t know any of that from watching b-movies where it’s a generic faux exotic monster to terrorize white people. You’d think anti-white anti-capitalist anti-American Hollywood would be all over that sort of symbolism, giving millions of dollars to Algonquin creators to realize their vision with faux profound statements like “America is the real wendigo”, but no! Instead we get yet another generic b-movie where a generic monster invented by white folks terrorizes white folks and has a foreign name tacked on to make it feel faux exotic (assuming viewers even know the name isn’t native English, and there’s a surprising number of people who don’t know that). The name is so utterly divorced from its roots and Algonquin cultures that I doubt any actually valid sense of cultural appropriation is applicable. A terminal case of cultural ignorance, maybe. We have the internet now, and entire books written about the origins and current cultural context of the wendigo, but still it’s the lies that circle the world.
The “windigo as colonialism and capitalist excess” technically long predates wokeness. First Nations people are still being subject to human rights abuses like involuntary sterilization well into the present, so it’s not surprising that ancient stories of monsters based on harsh winters have changed to suit the modern circumstances of indoor heating.So what was the monster like before its image got taken over by Wokeness?
>He's following a timetable established by TrumpView attachment 2479146
Hang on guys, if you tilt your head and squint, this is kind of a victory for feminism. But also we need to destroy all university records now now now oh god they're all going to die.
View attachment 2479151
Cope brothers! Cope like you've never coped before (since Bernie lost)!
It actually serves a plot purpose. In the world of goblin slayer, ALL goblins are male.I've always thought it's kind of lazy to use rape as shorthand for EEEE-vill, but these retards take getting a case of the vapors to a new extreme.
The Guy Pearce movie 'Ravenous' returns to the roots of the myth, which is (IIRC) that anyone who eats human flesh can become wendigo, and human flesh becomes an addiction for them.Offhand, is there any depiction that doesn't irretrievably fuck it up?
It's gonna be sad if Supernatural's second episode is a top contender too...The Guy Pearce movie 'Ravenous' returns to the roots of the myth, which is (IIRC) that anyone who eats human flesh can become wendigo, and human flesh becomes an addiction for them.
Great movie too, I get bored by yawnfest slasher flicks that are all fake blood, wobbly camera work and people screaming (looking at you, Rob Zombie), but Ravenous genuinely left me feeling nauseated.
The author freely admits that the story is pretty much inspired by the idea of the Punisher/Batman being thrown into D&D games.It's not a good story. Aside from being puerile and edgelordy (I'd say "misogynistic", but that's lost all meaning nowadays and isn't taken seriously even when it would make sense to apply), the world building is both generic D&D clone (which has its own issues that are too big to tackle here) and its unique aspect doesn't hold up under scrutiny. The 1d4chan page points out that you can't simultaneously depict the goblins as a big threat to civilization and as a harmless pest to the same civilization depending on whether it's convenient for the narrative at that moment, as that breaks suspension of disbelief.
Well then watch something like "That Time I got Reincarnated as a Slime." Or Maoyuu. Or so many more. There's plenty of anime out there that fulfill that itch. Goblin Slayer is mediocre, that's fair, but it's not trying to be anything deeper and just wants to be entertaining. It's the John Wick level of anime.The biggest sin I can level at GS personally is that it isn't WarCraft: Orcs & Humans. In that game, the orcs are conquistadors. Full stop. In the second game, they even recruit persecuted minorities to fight for them a la Cortez and the Aztecs. That's interesting, complex, nuanced, morally clusterfucked, very human-like despite being aliens from another world. (Ignore the retcons that they were innocent victims in the third game, that's war crime erasure bullshit.) I wish more orcs/goblins in fiction were like that, rather than the false dichotomy of either simplistic puppets of evil or poor innocent stand-ins for non-white people.
Well I think it's like 4 gods, but yes, that's fair.Guys, it's just a show about two gods playing D&D with murderhobo goblins who are also into rape.
Series, movie, Year One manga and up to vol 6 of the light novel.Did you watch the series? The tone is all over the place. The first episode makes it look like Berserk and then the rest are generic fantasy anime hijinks.