Crossover Ethan Ralph vs. Nick Rekieta & Elijah Schaffer - Current status: Nick Rekieta exposed for having a more attractive wife, big L.

I'm no Rekieta scholar, but I've never heard the man say anything remotely like this faggy guilt-by-association thing.
saying you shouldnt hang out with or support or defend and cover for a scumbag isnt guilt by association. also no im pretty sure hes went after people close to ron toye and others and ranted about it angrily.
 
I don't really care. I watch Nick when he covers a story that interests me, because I think he's good at breaking down legal cases without being overly dry and boring; I couldn't give a fuck what he does the rest of the time.

Caring about who is internet fwens with who seems pretty gay tbh
His show has gotten just so much worse since it became about comicsgate and Ron toye. Occasionally, he will still do a legal breakdown of something new, which is still good. And occasionally he will take bait from PPP for some reason, which is great but not in the way Nick would like us to enjoy his show
 
I'm no Rekieta scholar, but I've never heard the man say anything remotely like this faggy guilt-by-association thing.
I could be wrong, but the most I think he's ever said is, "If after you've heard the depositions [of Vic Mignogna, Monia Rial and Ron Toye] and still support Vic being cancelled when the defendants are evasive or changing their stories, then you're a faggot and just die."

EDIT: I take it back. He's certainly done some guilt by association when it comes to Lawtwitter, specifically people who follow Bettik, Wolff, Douchette, Popehat, and their hangers-on like Twotons.
 
I could be wrong, but the most I think he's ever said is, "If after you've heard the depositions [of Vic Mignogna, Monia Rial and Ron Toye] and still support Vic being cancelled when the defendants are evasive or changing their stories, then you're a faggot and just die."
what do you mean the most? thats actually worse hes now saying your legal opinion is wrong by association. thats way worse than just saying hey bro maybe dont hang out with shit huffing groomer faggots when you rant about morality constantly.
 
I could be wrong, but the most I think he's ever said is, "If after you've heard the depositions [of Vic Mignogna, Monia Rial and Ron Toye] and still support Vic being cancelled when the defendants are evasive or changing their stories, then you're a faggot and just die."
Gotcha. I'd argue that's a far cry from the other guy's claim that implied some kind of moral grandstanding.

I totally buy Nick saying "you're a retarded faggot if you disagree with this obvious conclusion", but not "you're immoral if you even associate with people I don't like".
 
what do you mean the most? thats actually worse hes now saying your legal opinion is wrong by association. thats way worse than just saying hey bro maybe dont hang out with shit huffing groomer faggots when you rant about morality constantly.
He's not saying their legal opinion is wrong because they disagree with him, he's saying if their position after hearing the depositions is Vic should be cancelled for shit that looks more and more like personal vendettas being acted upon and not actually Vic doing something wrong then you're scum.
 
I can't remember the precise moment it struck me, but there was a point in time when it dawned on me that something wasn't right. There were too many patently obvious things he didn't know.
I remember the precise moment it struck me that Nick is often completely full of shit. During Dick v PPP, when Nick pretended not to know who Zoom was after previously directly interacting with him enough to say "I can't be on this stream anymore, see ya" in the middle of Zoom's deeply weird and uncomfortable telestalking on stream.me, and to subsequently lay down a No Zoom policy on the youtube show
 
He's not saying their legal opinion is wrong because they disagree with him, he's saying if their position after hearing the depositions is Vic should be cancelled for shit that looks more and more like personal vendettas being acted upon and not actually Vic doing something wrong then you're scum.
no you can still think vic is shit without agreeing with those people. iirc theres a lot more than just them.

Gotcha. I'd argue that's a far cry from the other guy's claim that implied some kind of moral grandstanding.

I totally buy Nick saying "you're a retarded faggot if you disagree with this obvious conclusion", but not "you're immoral if you even associate with people I don't like".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbvdSD57zrQ about 1 min 54 seconds he goes off on this "being the pos you support as a champion for women" ralph has done mroe than beat women, so no he does know that it can be kinda shitty to hang out with and support wife beaters and chomos even if they agree with you or your politics or your streams


edit ffs:
yjytjtyj.png
 
He's not saying their legal opinion is wrong because they disagree with him, he's saying if their position after hearing the depositions is Vic should be cancelled for shit that looks more and more like personal vendettas being acted upon and not actually Vic doing something wrong then you're scum.
Aren't you a mod of his and suck his dick endlessly?
 
no you can still think vic is shit without agreeing with those people. iirc theres a lot more than just them.
A lot more who claim it but no one who has given us proof. It's a "quantity over quality" approach to trying to cancel someone, in that if you get more and more accusations, you cause people to go, "Well since there's so many at least some of them must be true!"
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Matt Damon
A lot more who claim it but no one who has given us proof. It's a "quantity over quality" approach to trying to cancel someone, in that if you get more and more accusations, you cause people to go, "Well since there's so many at least some of them must be true!"
i dont care about vic just the idea that nick never called anyone scummy for associating heavily with people, when he has, he has in the video where he weaponized toye being a wife beating scumbag in a much more hostile way than we have with him and he still cries about us and he did it with that case too.
 
This is the point. For two years now the Farms has been screaming "You need to disavow the Gunt!" to no avail. When the revenge porn saga started the Farms were saying he doesn't care about his own kids at all because he hadn't said anything. So he did his video on the revenge porn shit where he said if one of his daughters were Faith in the same situation, Ralph wouldn't be alive for long and somehow that wasn't good enough, despite him telling the Farms his position, and what they wanted to hear, the goalpost shifted again to he needs to disavow and disassociate with the Gunt. The problem is, Nick's a lolbertarian. He's a petulant child, in that if you tell him to do something (or not do something) he'll do the opposite just to spite you. Nick's fans know that. I've been telling the Farms that for a while. It's literally only a matter of time before Ralph does something that causes Nick to respond and disassociate. It's not a probability, it's a certainty. Last year, Ralph lost his shit with Nick because Ralph was trying to cancel Josh's t-shirt run and Nick told him to take some fucking Midol, which pissed him off more. Nick made it clear he hates that shit. Hell, Ralph had to weasel his way on to Bibble's DnD stream after that to get any face time with Nick because he was being ignored, that's how desperate the fat faggot was.

Just let it play out. Bitch about Nick not disavowing if you want, but as I've said for a while it won't change anything, and might actually prolong it because, again, he's a petulant child.
To be fair to Nick, he has said about this conflict that "He hates to see his friends fight."

I previously said I wouldn't put too much trust in him, and that is mainly because he wants to stay neutral. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that
(even with me, staying neutral in a conflict would be preferable) but it can erode the relationship between the two sides as they will see him as a unknown quantity, which can lead to distrust if it gets bad enough.

Personally, I dont really care where Nick stands in this fight. Staying out of it is probably the best course of action anyway.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Matt Damon
To be fair to Nick, he has said about this conflict that "He hates to see his friends fight."
you shouldnt really be friends with felon revenge porn releasing gf hitting soph stream having pieces of shit like the gunt though. all this stems from the premise that that is just a normal thing that no one can say is messed up.
 
I previously said I wouldn't put too much trust in him, and that is mainly because he wants to stay neutral.
I wouldn't put too much trust in him because he's demonstrated that he has lied in the past, and will therefore lie in the future. Lawyer, ya know
you shouldnt really be friends with felon revenge porn releasing gf hitting soph stream having pieces of shit like the gunt though. all this stems from the premise that that is just a normal thing that no one can say is messed up.
See, here's the big lie. Nick very often claims that he doesn't know what the gunt is up to. Yet he interacts with him regularly on Twitter and reads this site but may possibly not have an account. He would be unable to miss the features whenever there is a notable gunt event as even a casual user would

A simple "I don't want to, I'm an adult and I think that's for high school retards" would cut off all the calls to disavow Ethan Ralph, but he wants to keep a perceived distance when it suits him
 
A simple "I don't want to, I'm an adult and I think that's for high school retards" would cut off all the calls to disavow Ethan Ralph, but he wants to keep a perceived distance when it suits him
i think when someone is committing literal crimes its not highschool to say maybe dont hang out with or financially support or defend or cover for that person, its not suzy being a slut with trevor in the locker and you still hang with her its gunt releasing revenge porn and doxing his own son and beating his gf and grooming high school girls. the only thing high school about it is where ethan stalks for more victims.
 
Back