Crossover Ethan Ralph vs. Nick Rekieta & Elijah Schaffer - Current status: Nick Rekieta exposed for having a more attractive wife, big L.

Can you talk more about this story? Are y'all just fucking around of is their evidence of this?
It was one of the earlier road rages as Nick was starting to come famous, they all went to the party house Dax had rented for the after party, I'll just say lady rakkets is a flirty drunk and rakkets himself is a cuck. He got drunk and passed out and in the early morning hours lady rakkets spent most of that portion of the evening with one of the male dick show regulars, they spent a great deal of time on the roof together too, and I believe someone had to help her down after the sun rose. I am only sketchy on details because this was a long time ago, not to say I was there, but that I know of the story.
 
the thread was created when jannies moved posts to their own thread. It wasn't made by the poster
This has been posted in this thread several times. It shows the people bitching aren't reading the thread. I'd put some cash on them just coming here to defend Daddy Nicky.
 
This has been posted in this thread several times. It shows the people bitching aren't reading the thread. I'd put some cash on them just coming here to defend Daddy Nicky.
Just see the post above yours lol. Half of them don't read it at all while the other half just reads the "OP". Nick has done an incredible job forming a bit of a cult of personality (as much of one as you can make using the internet and youtube streams that is)
 
This thread speaks more of the OP being a faggot than the big nosed lawyer... Just saying.

Wait, Nick has been playing defense for Ethan Ralph?

...apparently, "not being coaxed into an 'I disavow' statement" == "guntguarding".
Could you faggots read the thread before commenting? I know it burns your buns that someone dares question the integrity of your internet daddy, but its been covered.
 
Could you faggots read the thread before commenting?
Are you trying to point out that this thread serves as containment and the name of it doesn't have much to do with the position the poster of the first post has, but it just happens that the first post is what it is?

Because you can do that without exposing your thin skin, talking about "internet daddies" and burnt buns.

Better yet, petition for a more neutral or basic title.
 
Are you trying to point out that this thread serves as containment and the name of it doesn't have much to do with the position the poster of the first post has, but it just happens that the first post is what it is?

Because you can do that without exposing your thin skin, talking about "internet daddies" and burnt buns.

Better yet, petition for a more neutral or basic title.
Why? If you bothered reading the thread the mod who did it, explains that its gay and dumb and did this for that reason. If you got yourself some preperation h and hooked on phonics you could figure that out yourself.
 
Why? If you bothered reading the thread the mod who did it
What here should arouse suspicion within me that this thread was made by someone other than the person who's marked as OP, when the original post doesn't even include a mod note, at least the first few pages don't come close to implying that this is a containment thread, the thread isn't named or tagged as "containment" or anything analogous, and I was specifically interested in responding to the OP?

lol no, it makes a great trap for people like you to get upset in. Absolutely perfect
Mild confusion with what superficially resembles conflation isn't "being upset".
 
Last edited:
What here should arouse suspicion within me that this thread was made by someone other than the person who's marked as OP, when the original post doesn't even include a mod note, at least the first few pages don't come close to implying that this is a containment thread, the thread isn't named or tagged as "containment" or anything analogous, and I was specifically interested in responding to the OP?


Mild confusion with what superficially resembles conflation isn't "being upset".
Just admit defeat and I wont have you beheaded. Simple as. Go watch some anime or something
 
Rekieta fanboys are fucking incredible almost worse then Ralphs capos. The guy spits on you, rips you off and lies to you constantly yet you can't allow some as simple as mean title.
I already explained my impression of the title and it had nothing to do with it being "mean", and everything to do with it-- along with the first few pages of this thread-- providing no indication that this was a containment board. Rather than "neutral" or "basic", however, a better term would have been "actually descriptive".

Rather than me being a fanboy, it seems you won't allow anyone to infringe on your holy circlejerk, even if misconceptions are reasonably expected.
 
Outside of just Rekieta, I don't know how anyone can buy this sort of shit "influencer" merch.
Try... Dream.
Hell, Dream's shitty merch shows more effort than this grifting nosenberg lolyer.
1630280573672.png

So let's see, 0.25 CNY for a single use mask with custom print, let's assume it's 100 per batch which makes it 25 yuan which is $4. $9 gets you KN94 masks with a custom logo, and $3 for a reusable one, presumably one copy and with inserts for an actual single-use surgical mask.

Description says the price is an estimate, let's fucking more than double that. So $20 for 100 surgical masks with a custom print and $10 for a reusable one. He's making at least 100% in profits. We've found the Dream of lolyering and low effort shitty merch.

This thread speaks more of the OP being a faggot than the big nosed lawyer... Just saying.
OP dindu nuffin, he's a good cat. His opinion is 100% valid and neutral, and reflects the frustrations of a shared audience among the two.

Are you trying to point out that this thread serves as containment and the name of it doesn't have much to do with the position the poster of the first post has, but it just happens that the first post is what it is?

Because you can do that without exposing your thin skin, talking about "internet daddies" and burnt buns.

Better yet, petition for a more neutral or basic title.
Do you know what "discussion" is? It's neutral enough, the title didn't directly accuse the Jew lawyer of guntguarding. Petition for fucking what, what's basic or neutral, your lame standards? The title reflects the topic and what the thread is about, it's short and concise, deal with it.
Thin skin lol lawyer pawn shop merchant greed grifter pot kettle nigger houses of glass stones etc.

first few pages don't come close to implying that this is a containment thread, the thread isn't named or tagged as "containment" or anything analogous, and I was specifically interested in responding to the OP?
Want to know why the first few pages "don't come close"? That's the exact fucking reason justifying the creation of this thread. Pages of people babbling about the cuck lawyer rather than Ethanol Liver Ralph's revenge pornography.

We don't have the containment tag, you'd infer this fact if you actually had some common sense but you don't even know what a discussion is. Go cry to the master jannies about the lack of a prefix.

title isnt up to muh standards i wasnt told this was a containment wahhh circle-jerk
1630281650107.png

I have a feeling that a mere discussion or speculation of the weebtrash/comics manbaby crossdressing lolbertarian CATholic lolyer who baths in plushies is blasphemy to your types. That's why you didn't even bother to read the first few pages. Ethanol Liver Ralph at least never showed himself in drag (yet).

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/discu...-guntguarding-and-grifting.98931/post-9852378
This was on page fucking 3, so you didn't even read pass the first 2 pages, yet you're here incoherently screeching about an OP trigger warning and petitioning for a title that makes you feel better.
 
I already explained my impression of the title and it had nothing to do with it being "mean", and everything to do with it-- along with the first few pages of this thread-- providing no indication that this was a containment board. Rather than "neutral" or "basic", however, a better term would have been "actually descriptive".

Rather than me being a fanboy, it seems you won't allow anyone to infringe on your holy circlejerk, even if misconceptions are reasonably expected.

What the fuck is wrong with you? This is autistic word salad. I'm kinda surprised people even care about your posts.
 
This has been posted in this thread several times. It shows the people bitching aren't reading the thread. I'd put some cash on them just coming here to defend Daddy Nicky.
The ricotta threads are chock full of his fan boys so you're almost certainly correct. Calling nick out on anything there will get your inbox absolutely bodied by replies of outrage. It's honestly pretty fun.
Rather than me being a fanboy, it seems you won't allow anyone to infringe on your holy circlejerk, even if misconceptions are reasonably expected.
You calling this thread a circle jerk with no sense of self awareness is just...
*MWAH*
1630287522359.png
 
Last edited:
Do you know what "discussion" is? It's neutral enough,
This was on page fucking 3, so you didn't even read pass the first 2 pages

And you didn't even bother to read this very page, where I corrected myself and said that it would be more proper to say that the thread title wasn't "descriptive" enough, rather than "neutral". Even then, the issue isn't about "hurt feelings" or whatever helps you fill yourself with righteous ownage, it's about being interested in and commenting on the first thing I was interested in commenting on while not having reason to believe that this was a spliced thread because that wasn't indicated at the start, like with other containment threads.

It's not a big deal to do that, but it isn't even a big deal if that's not done, regardless of whether you perpetually get the occasional comment that doesn't recognize that this is a containment thread that started as a thread splicing. Making this mistake, however, was enough to get me labeled as a Rekieta fanboy-- even if the comment I made would have been made in any other situation with any other person because I was pointing out an ostensible contradiction.

We don't have the containment tag
"Nobody can type 'containment' in titles-- it has to be pre-typed in a tag! Don't mind the numerous other threads clearly marked as containment threads in their titles!"

Are you deliberately half-reading my comments to get me to repeat myself?

I have a feeling that a mere discussion or speculation of the weebtrash/comics manbaby crossdressing lolbertarian CATholic lolyer who baths in plushies is blasphemy to your types.
I reckon you're extremely thin skinned and unable to handle even non-vitriolic comments, to the point that you lost track of what the original issue even was.

What the fuck is wrong with you? This is autistic word salad.
Your gimmick is acting like you have an undiagonsed LD in an attempt to disarm the person you're talking to.
 
And you didn't even bother to read this very page, where I corrected myself and said that it would be more proper to say that the thread title wasn't "descriptive" enough, rather than "neutral". Even then, the issue isn't about "hurt feelings" or whatever helps you fill yourself with righteous ownage, it's about being interested in and commenting on the first thing I was interested in commenting on while not having reason to believe that this was a spliced thread because that wasn't indicated at the start, like with other containment threads.

It's not a big deal to do that, but it isn't even a big deal if that's not done, regardless of whether you perpetually get the occasional comment that doesn't recognize that this is a containment thread that started as a thread splicing. Making this mistake, however, was enough to get me labeled as a Rekieta fanboy-- even if the comment I made would have been made in any other situation with any other person because I was pointing out an ostensible contradiction.


"Nobody can type 'containment' in titles-- it has to be pre-typed in a tag! Don't mind the numerous other threads clearly marked as containment threads in their titles!"

Are you deliberately half-reading my comments to get me to repeat myself?


I reckon you're extremely thin skinned and unable to handle even non-vitriolic comments, to the point that you lost track of what the original issue even was.


Your gimmick is acting like you have an undiagonsed LD in an attempt to disarm the person you're talking to.
Nicks not gonna have sex with you dude, but if you send in enough super chats you still stand a chance with his wife.
 
Back