Science EXCLUSIVE: Dr. Fauci Used Taxpayer Money to Have Dogs Tortured and Eaten Alive By Parasite Infected Flies in Tunisia (PHOTOS) - I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/exclusive-dr-fauci-used-taxpayer-money-dogs-tortured-eaten-alive-parasite-infected-flies-tunisia-photos/

​

​

The White Coat Waste Project, a taxpayer watchdog group, has provided The Gateway Pundit with new examples of Dr. Anthony Fauci facilitating cruel and unnecessary taxpayer funded experimentation on dogs — this time in Tunisia.​

Documents uncovered by the organization found that the National Institutes of Health division that is led by Dr. Fauci shipped part of a $375,800 grant to the lab in Tunisia to infest beagles with parasites.

The grant money funded a study published last month that detailed the horror inflicted upon the unlucky dogs.

Advertisement - story continues below

One of the tortures that the beagles were subjected to included locking their heads in mesh cages filled with infected sand flies so that the parasite-carrying insects could eat them alive.

Beagles are often used for these tests because of their gentle nature, even towards those who harm them.

There was a photo of the test, which is sure to haunt anyone with a conscience.

Fauci’s taxpayer funded animal experiments in Tunisia

According to their paper, the scientists starved the sand flies in order to make sure they were hungry enough to attack the dogs.

“The sand flies were then allowed to feed on the sedated dogs….” the report explains.

The nightmare for dogs did not stop there. The experimenters locked beagles alone in cages in the middle of the desert, isolated, for nine consecutive nights, to use as bait to attract more infectious sand flies. There is also a photo of this horror.

Fauci’s taxpayer funded animal experiments in Tunisia

“Fauci’s dog testing debacle is now an international disgrace. Not only is Fauci paying for beagle abuse here at home, but he also shipped our tax dollars overseas to have beagles eaten alive by insects in an African lab with no oversight from U.S. authorities. Taxpayers shouldn’t be forced to foot the bill for this government waste and abuse. Congress must take action to investigate the full extent of Fauci’s dog testing debacle,” Mackie Burr, Director of Digital & Grassroots Development at the White Coat Waste Project said.

The article’s “Funding Statement” confirmed that it was given money by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and that NIH funding was given to the lab in Tunisia.

“EZ and AS received funding from the US National Institutes of Health,” according to the grant. “EZ” is one of the paper’s co-authors, Elyes Zhioua, from the Institut Pasteur de Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia. “AS” is Abhay Satoskar, from Ohio State University.

White Coat Waste Project pointed out that on the NIH’s website, Zhioua is listed as the co-PI on the grant along with Satoskar.

White Coat Waste Project, using the Freedom of Information Act, recently revealed that Fauci spent $424,000 to commission another study in which healthy beagles were given an experimental drug and intentionally infested with flies that carry a disease-causing parasite that affects humans.

The researchers are developing infections in 28 beagles and allowing them to suffer for three months before being euthanized.

The report from White Coat Waste Project explained that records show that the dogs were “vocalizing in pain” during the experiments.

The organization also noted that experimenters admit this investigational drug, “has been extensively tested and confirmed…in different animal models such as mice…Mongolian gerbils…and rhesus macaques….” Meaning that this painful torture is completely unnecessary.

In a letter sent to Fauci last week, Congressman Scott Perry and 14 colleagues cited their investigation and demanded answers about the project — including has much money has been spent to date, how many dogs have been killed, and why the NIH commissioned the deadly dog testing when the Food and Drug Administration has said it’s not required.

The letter was signed by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Ken Calvert (R-CA), Madison Cawthorn (R-NC), Rodney Davis (R-IL), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Diane Harshbarger (R-TN), Yvette Herrell (R-NM), Fred Keller (R-PA), Brian Mast (R-FL), Bill Posey (R-FL), Greg Steube (R-FL), Glenn Thompson (R-PA), Randy Weber (R-TX) and Daniel Webster (R-FL).

In 2016, White Coat Waste exposed how Fauci’s NIH division was using tax dollars to buy beagle puppies and strapping capsules full of infected flies to their bare skin.

Fauci and the NIH have also been under fire for using American tax dollars to fund the Wuhan Animal Lab’s coronavirus experiments on bats and other animals.

 

[Blake Chortles]

As someone who was involved with animal research (piglets and rats mainly). Most of what we do is a waste of time reconfirming decades old research and is really just a way to appear busy in between actual important grants.

 

[DumbDude42]

Case B: Tell veterinarians to test drug on dogs that come in with parasite infections

by doing that you would lose your controlled research environment, which would severely reduce the overall scientific value of the data you're collecting.

with the lab trial you have a bunch of specially bred lab dogs of the same age, from the exact same breed, whose entire previous medical history you know, infected with a specific species of parasite which you control directly, and you also control their environment, diet, activity levels, etc during the trials.

with your vet study idea you'd get a bunch of random mutts of random age, with unknown medical history, who show up at some vet clinic with random mystery disease which the local vet suspects might be some kind of parasite problem.

it'd be like trying to do chemistry experiments using kitchen pots instead of lab glassware and a jug of seawater straight from the ocean instead of lab grade distilled water.

 

[Tridgeridoo]

"One of the tortures that the beagles were subjected to included locking their heads in mesh cages filled with infected sand flies so that the parasite-carrying insects could eat them alive."

If you actually read the paper, the dogs were under anesthesia with their heads in mesh cages and sandflies were allowed to bite them for 60 minutes. That's it. They were 'eaten alive' by parasite-carrying insects in much the same way that I've been eaten alive by insects when near a body of water at night.

Why dogs? Because dogs are the main reservoir hosts for this particular parasite.
Why Tunisia? Because that's one of the regions where this parasite exists naturally.

These guys are trying to develop a vaccine against a parasite that kills tons of young children every year, and people are getting worked up about a few dogs getting sandfly bites instead of the dead kids.

A researcher gets an NIH grant to expose dogs to sandflies for 60 minutes and this somehow gets turned into 'Fauci is having dogs tortured and eaten alive'. This is outrage bait and shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone, regardless of whether or not they hate Fauci.

 

[Unassuming Local Guy]

with your vet study idea you'd get a bunch of random mutts of random age, with unknown medical history, who show up at some vet clinic with random mystery disease which the local vet suspects might be some kind of parasite problem.

Isn't that just human trials? If they work for people one could assume the same methodology would work for dogs.

 

[DumbDude42]

Isn't that just human trials? If they work for people one could assume the same methodology would work for dogs.

the methodology works in the sense that you still get some amount of value from the data, yes.
it's just a lot lower quality data, and you'd have to massively expand the scale of your study to compensate for it. like, instead of testing on ten lab dogs, you'd have to test on like a thousand vet clinic dogs, to make up for all the uncontrolled (and unknown) variations between them. that means instead of spending 300k dollars over a 3 month period, you'll now be spending 3 million dollars over a 3 year period.

 

[Unassuming Local Guy]

the methodology works in the sense that you still get some amount of value from the data, yes.
it's just a lot lower quality data, and you'd have to massively expand the scale of your study to compensate for it. like, instead of testing on ten lab dogs, you'd have to test on like a thousand vet clinic dogs, to make up for all the uncontrolled (and unknown) variations between them. that means instead of spending 300k dollars over a 3 month period, you'll now be spending 3 million dollars over a 3 year period.

It's kind of like the animal version of "we could advance medical science a lot more quickly if we just experimented on prisoners". It's objectively true, but it's also a line very few people are willing to cross.

What really gets me is how these experiments could be done in a much more humane manner. Namely, why kill the healthy dogs after you're done? You tested the drug and it worked. Executing them all after the fact just feels like sadism.

 

[OvercookedBacon]

This won't change anything, even if it's true.

Fauci could eat a baby alive on livestream, and they'd praise him for his progressive, Scientific embrace of kid-veal.

They'd call it a modest proposal, I think.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

Scientists: "I am going to torture doggos but it's ok, it is for heckin le ebin science"

 

[The handsome tard]

hey look, i'm just saying this now
but like
the average rich person in this day and age
feels nothing, they are empty to the world
they need to buy bigger more expensive things
they feel no love, so they tourture animals and sodomize children
it's what the upper class has become
just a reminder

They want you dead and your children raped

And they find it hilarious

 

[Meth Kennedy]

Hitler was 100% correct and this whole situation is proof of that.

 

[Thiletonomics]

It's a psychological disorder called sadism, or sadistic sociopathy, where some people are so fucked in the brain that they derive pleasure from torturing helpless animals. It is unfortunately a pervasive disorder among globalists, commies, and the (((elite))). Luckily the cure is cheap and simple, requiring only a length of rope and an elevated anchor point.

So does that mean that Dr. Fauci will soon get caught drawing Fluffies torture porn pictures?

 

[Buttigieg2020]

I'm sure that the Gateway Pundit also cares dearly about the legions of labrats bred specifically for scientific testing procedures, or the industrial-scale fur farms from which fox pelts are sourced from.

Why should they? Dogs taste substantially worse than either of those.

 

[Str8Bustah]

What really gets me is how these experiments could be done in a much more humane manner. Namely, why kill the healthy dogs after you're done? You tested the drug and it worked. Executing them all after the fact just feels like sadism.

I'd say it's a case of putting the dogs out of their misery but it sounds like godless snuff porn to raise something up just to test drugs on it and then kill it afterwards. The least they could have done is let the healthy dogs go somewhere as free to good home or some other shit, if there's no more chance of parasitic infection following the drug testing than there was originally then it must be fine to take that option.

 

[LurkTrawl]

I don't really get why they needed to use so many sandflies, nor why they couldn't extract the parasite from ones carrying it and inject them using some form of medical instrument.

 

[s0mbra]

"One of the tortures that the beagles were subjected to included locking their heads in mesh cages filled with infected sand flies so that the parasite-carrying insects could eat them alive."

If you actually read the paper, the dogs were under anesthesia with their heads in mesh cages and sandflies were allowed to bite them for 60 minutes. That's it. They were 'eaten alive' by parasite-carrying insects in much the same way that I've been eaten alive by insects when near a body of water at night.

Why dogs? Because dogs are the main reservoir hosts for this particular parasite.
Why Tunisia? Because that's one of the regions where this parasite exists naturally.

These guys are trying to develop a vaccine against a parasite that kills tons of young children every year, and people are getting worked up about a few dogs getting sandfly bites instead of the dead kids.

A researcher gets an NIH grant to expose dogs to sandflies for 60 minutes and this somehow gets turned into 'Fauci is having dogs tortured and eaten alive'. This is outrage bait and shouldn't be taken seriously by anyone, regardless of whether or not they hate Fauci.

Ok but why are MY tax dollars going to a bunch of dumb niggers who can't bathe?
Not my problem. If the elite care so much about third world shit holes, why not use some of their billions towards their pet projects? It would be nothing to them.

Fuck literally everything about this.

 

[AMERICA]

This research was completely unnecessary. They weren't even testing the efficacy of a life-saving drug, they wanted to determine if parasitized dogs are more attractive to sandworms than nonparasitized dogs. They also suggest that parasitized dogs should be targeted first to control the spread of zoonotic disease in South Africa for this reason. Did you really have to torture those dogs to figure that one out..

 

[Trianon]

Foxes are canines. Also better than dogs. They can laugh.

This. That channel is the best, and domestic foxes are freaking amazing.

I hate using taxpayer money to fund experiments in other countries with less oversight. It's clear they just prefer not to be told what happens.