- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
I'm pretty sure even Audrey Hepburn had at least one man who was sick of her shit, and I question your judgement, sir.
Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner
- Thread starter Cryin RN
- Start date
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
New docs! Images to be uploaded shortly
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
Call your grammar sperg from the last docs drop, Russ doesn't know how to use articles.
Russ, since I don't believe that "Plaintiff hardly even visits that website", a lesson: as a general rule you don't use any articles for people's names. The way you wrote it, "a Sam Ambreen" means "one (of many) Sam Ambreens", which is clearly not what you meant.
- Joined
- May 21, 2018
I just want the judge to look at him and say, "A lawyer representing different parties against lawsuits you chose to file is not a conflict of interests, you gimp-faced pipsqueak. Now sit down and shut your mouth. Oh, wait...."
Is that too much to ask?
Is that too much to ask?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2018
Some choice quotes that I found funny:
"If a thread exists, you mustacquit believe everything this person has ever said."
Russ does not understand what a conflict of interest is:
"If a thread exists, you must
Russ does not understand what a conflict of interest is:
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Did Russ accidently admit that this was filed in bad faith? 'Cause it's supposed to be "couldn't be". This implies that Skordas was spot on
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2015
Dear Russell Greer,
Screen-caps of news articles and comments are not evidence.
Sincerely,
Kiwi Farms.
Screen-caps of news articles and comments are not evidence.
Sincerely,
Kiwi Farms.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
I think in light of Russel's claims about Kiwi Farms and it's purpose it's worth remembering Russel harassed a person...
...a person who, unfortunately, committed suicide not long after:
Following logic presented in the document (being talked about in an unfavorable way on the Internet -> suicide), Russel would be at least co-responsible for this unfortunate event.
Additionally the screenshot proves that Russel displays callous disrespect for the person who passed away and her family.
...a person who, unfortunately, committed suicide not long after:
Following logic presented in the document (being talked about in an unfavorable way on the Internet -> suicide), Russel would be at least co-responsible for this unfortunate event.
Additionally the screenshot proves that Russel displays callous disrespect for the person who passed away and her family.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2016
Ooooo, Sapphire Crimson Claw, the person who had her DA and cellphone taken away because she was grooming children while LARPing as the ghost of Michal Jackson, and who claims to be married to the ghosts of multiple serial killers and one actor!
She's a really great source, Russell. Please go on about Sapphire Crimson Claw.
N0t4blet4rt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2017
I am so happy to live in a universe where there is an actual legal document that contains the words "has beef with Greer".
Another shining example of the waste of paper his "degree" was printed on.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2021
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2015
This just furthers my belief that Russ was passed merely to get rid of him and not because he passed his classes.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Lol, this reply:
Pipsqueak: I'm tellin'!
Skordas: (asks court to dismiss claim)
Pipsqueak: You--you, LISTEN, you DINGUS! This is a LEEGLE CLAIM!
Skordas: This suit was filed in bad faith. We would like to ask the court to dismiss on these grounds plus failure to state a claim.
Pipsqueak: NO IT'S NOT!!!!
Skordas: Respectfully, yes it is.
Pipsqueak: NO ISHHHH NAHHHHT!! (sluuurrrrrrp!)
Skordas: Respectfully, yes it is. This claim was filed in bad faith, and we'd like to ask the court to dismiss.
Pipsqueak: I'M TELLIN'!!!!
Pipsqueak: I'm tellin'!
Skordas: (asks court to dismiss claim)
Pipsqueak: You--you, LISTEN, you DINGUS! This is a LEEGLE CLAIM!
Skordas: This suit was filed in bad faith. We would like to ask the court to dismiss on these grounds plus failure to state a claim.
Pipsqueak: NO IT'S NOT!!!!
Skordas: Respectfully, yes it is.
Pipsqueak: NO ISHHHH NAHHHHT!! (sluuurrrrrrp!)
Skordas: Respectfully, yes it is. This claim was filed in bad faith, and we'd like to ask the court to dismiss.
Pipsqueak: I'M TELLIN'!!!!
- Joined
- May 7, 2021
Russel's legal genius never fails to disappoint. How will Skordas go on?!
Edited to add (from page actual 6):
Famous last words!
Edited to add (from page actual 6):
Famous last words!
Last edited:
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2014
The only greater Kiwi Farms related legal moment was getting a federal judge to say 'Cumrobbery' in open court.
(reference the first Len Shaner thread if this is too obscure for you, peeps.)
- Joined
- May 7, 2021
I'm nearly positive the previous mentions of deposits were in discussion with legalization (or decrim) so if a hooker took your deposit, yeah, you'd call the cops/sue her. That was the point of it being brought up, I though? Recourses and safety nets for both sides?
(late and gay, page want refreshing properly. Damned timeouts, I nearly missed new docs!)
(late and gay, page want refreshing properly. Damned timeouts, I nearly missed new docs!)
This reply is everything I've come to expect from Russell. It's my birthday.
Page 1: "Being offended or outraged by something isn't enough to give a Plaintiff standing to sue." (6 more pages of offended outrage that barely touches on the alleged copyright infringement.)
Page 2: "f^**ckers" - F to the power of asterisks ckers!
Page 3: "burn in fucking hell" - Wait, was I censoring words?
Page 4: "f***ck" - A six-letter word starting with f and ending with ck... I got nothing.
Page 5: Skordas says he isn't harassing Greer, "but that's just not true," judge! Wahhh, make the bad man stop!
Page 6: This is the best page.
The first sentence is ten lines long with three "which" clauses.
He's not a serial litigant, judge. All four cases were totally justified, even though he admitted to frivolous lawsuits in his totally-not-a-supplement-brief.
Plaintiff believes he will win...unless the judge doesn't agree. Then Plaintiff is screwed. But he did everything right, so he should totally win.
Page 1: "Being offended or outraged by something isn't enough to give a Plaintiff standing to sue." (6 more pages of offended outrage that barely touches on the alleged copyright infringement.)
Page 2: "f^**ckers" - F to the power of asterisks ckers!
Page 3: "burn in fucking hell" - Wait, was I censoring words?
Page 4: "f***ck" - A six-letter word starting with f and ending with ck... I got nothing.
Page 5: Skordas says he isn't harassing Greer, "but that's just not true," judge! Wahhh, make the bad man stop!
Page 6: This is the best page.
The first sentence is ten lines long with three "which" clauses.
He's not a serial litigant, judge. All four cases were totally justified, even though he admitted to frivolous lawsuits in his totally-not-a-supplement-brief.
Plaintiff believes he will win...unless the judge doesn't agree. Then Plaintiff is screwed. But he did everything right, so he should totally win.
Attachments
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
"If I have to spend TEN MINUTES explaining to you how businesses work, and the laws of supply and demand, then you'll spend TEN MINUTES in a cell for EACH MINUTE I have to spend eXpLaInInG!"
--that dang, dirty, bias judge
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2021
With every filing Russ does it gets more and more like a rant over some social media messaging service.
It’s almost word salad at this point.
It’s almost word salad at this point.