US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?

 

[Gehenna]

I'm not against a bit of getting hands dirty but could we not take fucking MovieBob as our strategist?

"Give up everything you stand for, it will be fine."

 

[LaxerBRO]

So what's the ETA until courts strike down the mandate. I understand it's a weekend now, so no one can make a move, but what kind of a time scale are we talking about here. Weeks or months?

The plaintiffs need the actual rule from OSHA to file a lawsuit, then they need to find someone that is harmed or could be before a lawsuit can be filed. What he hope is for is a preliminary injunction from the rule being enforced. That is my hope.

What needs to be done is to stall enforcement on this OSHA rule until the pandemic numbers goes down. Once the pandemic numbers goes down, the justification for the OSHA rule is moot.

 

[HumanHive]

I'm not against a bit of getting hands dirty but could we not take fucking MovieBob as our strategist?

How else can we progress into a superior future?

 

[Gehenna]

The plaintiffs need the actual rule from OSHA to file a lawsuit, then they need to find someone that is harmed or could be before a lawsuit can be filed. What he hope is for is a preliminary injunction from the rule being enforced. That is my hope.

What needs to be done is to stall enforcement on this OSHA rule until the pandemic numbers goes down. Once the pandemic numbers goes down, the justification for the OSHA rule is moot.

A violation of constitutional rights is an injury itself, you don't need an individual affected to file suit on constitutional grounds.,

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

Caption This:
View attachment 2528357

Joe: "Take off your top!"
Obama: "Bruh, she's 10"

 

[JohnDoe]

Overthrow the government.

Before the feds start jacking off, this doesn't have to be a violent thing. A democratic overthrow is perfectly possible, and in fact eminently preferable. The election of a populist, often hated by establishments, can do it. And in fact is. The question remains for if the Democrats will nuke everything before it can happen, but right now the Republicans are having a shift. To be more combative, more eager to listen, more eager to change. That kind of overthrow is what is needed.

Everyone would prefer a peaceful solution, but since that involves the currently entrenched tyrants losing power and wealth they have been working overtime to ensure that such solutions are increasing impossible. They have been turning up the heat as high as they can in as many spheres as possible while simultaneously shutting off all the normal pressure release valves and welding them shut. You'd almost think that they want violence, as if they hunger for blood.

Are they that confident, or just arrogant?

 

[DicksOutForKiwigglers]

"Give up everything you stand for, it will be fine."

I never said that. Standing up for your beliefs and fighting as hard as you possibly can to defend them isn't saying, "Give up everything you stand for." Unless of course, what you stand for is cucking on every major issue and rolling over for your enemies. They call you a racist nazi bastard? That's okay. They have a right to say that. Calling them a tranny dick sucking retard cunt in response is against my values.

#TurnTheOtherCheek

 

[JosephStalin]

20 years since 9-11. Apparently Joey made some speech somewhere, not that it matters. And I guess he recorded some drivel, again not that it matters.

Sometimes a national calamity galvanizes America to take a lot of positive actions, and ultimately, despite the sacrifices, come out better as a country. Most recent example of that I can think of is Pearl Harbor.

9-11 has not made us better as a country at all. The knee-jerk reactions were much too harsh overall. Still not sure if our continental air defense has been upgraded. We took the good mission of routing the Taliban from Afghanistan and setting the stage for free elections and turned it into a 20-year tale of stupidity and waste in trying to build a nation from a medieval quagmire. As a nation, America started running scared. When you have to make military language students do a threat assessment to have a picnic in a Monterey, CA city park things have gone off the deep end.

And we have paid a terrible price for 9-11, in so many ways. First, all those killed/injured/exposed to damaging substances that day. Second, the waste of Afghanistan's mission creep. Third, the accelerated loss of confidence, faith, and trust in government/law enforcement/judiciary/media at all levels. Please note this has continued while both Republicans and Democrats sat in the White House. Am sure anyone here can add more of the price paid. I cannot think of one single solitary good thing that came out of 9-11. Can you? National unity? Fleetingly.

And Joey, who was VP for eight years of this shit, just bumbles along like Mr. Magoo, not a fucking clue, just incompetent and useless.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

A violation of constitutional rights is an injury itself

 

[Gehenna]

Everyone would prefer a peaceful solution, but since that involves the currently entrenched tyrants losing power and wealth they have been working overtime to ensure that such solutions are increasing impossible. They have been turning up the heat as high as they can in as many spheres as possible while simultaneously shutting off all the normal pressure release valves and welding them shut. You'd almost think that they want violence, as if they hunger for blood.

Are they that confident, or just arrogant?

I'd say it's increasingly -possible-, hence the violent and aggressive moves by those tyrants. Those tyrants are all reaching the ends of their lives, and modern medicine can only go so far. What's worse, they have systematically removed anyone that could rise up in the ranks after them. This could all be ignored if the status quo has been maintained, with the RINOs toothless and the Progressives in line, the Uniparty would remain supreme and when the current leadership dies new ones would naturally find their place.

But that's not the case, the Republicans are making a comeback, the progressives have yet to lose any steam. When the current leadership dies, everything they worked for will die with them.

 

[Rumpled Foreskin]

Not sure why, but this has been stuck in my head for a few weeks.

 

[Some Badger]

The reason the Left propagates itself so easily these days is because they don't care about hypocrisy or ethics. They brute force their way through everything. Meanwhile, the Right fights with it's hands tied behind their back. If you want to win, stop "losing with dignity" and "being the better man" and start playing to win. There are no bad tactics, only bad targets.

Make your enemy play by their own rules.

You're forgetting that the Left is able to collectivize across sub-ideologies yet the Right can't because the former has collectivization baked into the way they operate and conduct policy. It's how they were able to usurp the religious right's thirty-year hegemony over culture methodically within a couple decades. It's not necessarily ideology that allows the Left to overlook its own hypocrisy, play by its own rules and constantly shift rhetorical goal posts, but it's also the fact that the deck is stacked in their favor now. These are the same people who, twenty years ago, were bitching about the Right's hypocrisy and desperate need to retain its slipping power, simply because they were envious of the power that the Right wielded; they have now become everything they used to despise without a shred of irony.

With all that said, infantilizing politicians at the expense of the Left doesn't have the same bite to it the way the Left does it to the Right. Their stranglehold on mainstream media allows them to control the narrative to such an extent that it makes the Right look foolish while the Left doing the same thing either gets downplayed or outright swept under the rug. Following the 2016 election, you had a bunch of Brits across a fucking ocean with zero stake in our politics flying a giant parade float of a big orange baby through the streets of London that got media attention across the developed world. If the Right did the same thing, not only would the Left be clutching their pearls and take the moral high ground at every turn, but a lot of people on the Right would be dismissive of it too.

You can't win with their tactics because they will just spin the narrative against you, and you will look like a massive faggot to your own constituents.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

For the first time in my life I've actually hit the point where I cannot respect the office of the President of the United States. I cannot look at him as my commander in chief.

I don't know how I feel.

I know the feeling you're looking for.

 

[spiritofamermaid]

Just rejected by everyone. Even Democrat governors will be hesitant to enact it. The knock-on effects of that? Could only speculate. But the fact it will fail due to disobedience is a certainty.

What about companies that are already requiring it due to the order?

 

[Gehenna]

I never said that. Standing up for your beliefs and fighting as hard as you possibly can to defend them isn't saying, "Give up everything you stand for." Unless of course, what you stand for is cucking on every major issue and rolling over for your enemies. They call you a racist nazi bastard? That's okay. They have a right to say that. Calling them a tranny dick sucking retard cunt in response is against my values.

#TurnTheOtherCheek

The inevitable result of "no bad tactics, only bad targets" is the loss of all you believe in. Once you choose to allow any tactic, you must fundamentally agree to compromise any principle to initiate that proposal.

Inevitably, when there are no restraints, there are no beliefs to keep.

 

[SeniorFuckFace]

The election of a populist, often hated by establishments, can do it.

Then how are we not back to where we were with Trump; disobedience, complete subversion and anti-populist from the entire Political/Corporate/Military/Academia/MSN/Hollywood class

It will be a redo because of the existing rot that has now been thoroughly exposed, everyone doubling---tripling down....

What does the newly elected populist do in terms of cleaning house when the source of the rot does not comply with the Executive branch?

 

[Gehenna]

Then how are we not back to where we were with Trump; disobedience, complete subversion and anti-populist from the entire Political/Military/Academia/MSN/Hollywood class

It will be a redo because of the existing rot that has now been thoroughly exposed, everyone doubling---tripling down....

What does the newly elected populist do in terms of cleaning house when the source of the rot does not comply with the Executive branch?

The election of a populist is only the beginning, what follows must be reforms. Trump's election was premature, the reforms unknown, and too much resistance from unexpected angles. But even then, his election didn't have any results. The Republican party is reforming itself, his presence continues and creates openings for more and new populists. The Democrats and Uniparty apparatus of course are seeking to destory this, and may yet succeed.

The war doesn't end with one election, it only intensifies.

 

[verissimus]

The inevitable result of "no bad tactics, only bad targets" is the loss of all you believe in. Once you choose to allow any tactic, you must fundamentally agree to compromise any principle to initiate that proposal.

Inevitably, when there are no restraints, there are no beliefs to keep.

It's pure Machiavellianism.

 

[DicksOutForKiwigglers]

The inevitable result of "no bad tactics, only bad targets" is the loss of all you believe in. Once you choose to allow any tactic, you must fundamentally agree to compromise any principle to initiate that proposal.

Inevitably, when there are no restraints, there are no beliefs to keep.

I highly disagree with this based on the very fact that the Left exists and it's beliefs are clearly defined. Saying fighting with all you have gets rid of your identity is false. If anything, it strengthens your identity and takes hold of the zeitgeist.

 

[derpherp2]

It's pure Machiavellianism.

You mean retarded.
Massive groups live and die in common ideals, if you have nothing in common with the millions of people you're supposed to ally with - why do anything?

Hinging all of your group's identity on being contrarian against another group is a recipe for disaster, after all what happens when that group is gone and you've seen how far your "friends" will go and how hungrily they're looking at each other?