Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

OK, did probably the most useless part: went through the first 50 pages of the thread (so pretty much: before she joined the forum), through her entire posting history looking for something outside of the thread. Most of my findings are questionable at best (mostly her expressing hatred and vindictiveness towards Null with law, at least secular law, being mentioned only vaguely; skipped stuff like cursing Null as unrelated to legal process in any way). Assumed it's better to take notes and delete unrelated stuff later than go through it all again.
What's left to do is going through pages 50-1095, reading every single post and digging up some actual meat. It will, of course, take time.
Is stuff posted by Marshall useful in any way?
Archiving forum posts doesn't work at the moment, possibly because of the DDoS. To be added later.
Twitter archived.

Video archive:
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/WfnUvQ49kMDf/ (Marshall)

Her first post in the thread:
https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5818560

Admission of seeking revenge not justice.
1631376318594.png
(no link, only archived screen survived)

Link: https://twitter.com/MelindaLScott1/status/1409960936278986759
Link: https://twitter.com/MelindaLScott1/status/1409973831855394820
Archive: https://archive.md/3EEfM
Archive: https://archive.md/J3dZp
Quote: „This is such sad, unfortunate news. I have tried to sue Joshua Moon and get that site down. Hopefully the judges will do the right thing and take it down. How many more victims before the government does anything about that horrible site?!”
Quote: „Trying (to destroy Joshua Moon’s business)! I have sued him in federal court for a thread about me. 2 others as well. They are all pending cases. Let's hope a judge or 2, or 3 wakes up!

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/2020-12-07-scott-v-moon-mk-vi.80988/post-8461691
Archive:
Quote: „I can completely mock Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork.”
Comment: Can be interpreted as filing lawsuit to mock the defendant

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5818791
Archive:
Quote: „And I also propose a question to you, the question is twofold: (a) Do you know what the penalty is in The Torah for persecuting the Righteous? and (b) do you know when Elohim will pay out those penalities?”
Comment: Admits to wishing to ruin defendant’s life for "religious" reasons and personal vengeance.
 
Well that's fantastic as I haven't been able to hunt them down yet
@Useful_Mistake Maybe you have the docs where those e-mails were attached as evidence? Ones where Raf offer to pay her one dollar :)

Found something really nice early in the thread:
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827028
Quote: "Call CPS and all I have to do is show them the screenshot of what you just said. It automatically dismisses the allegations under Virginia law."
Comment: Encourages and welcomes CPS call therefore can't claim the call happening caused her severe emotional distress.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5841382
Quote: If the court believed they were "frivolous" they would have never allowed the to make it to the judge and they would have bared me fr further filing.
For one, the judge knew I was a former law school student, and that my legal education could be furthered by allowing them through
And two, the federal judge did not follow the rules of the court nor the laws. It's called judicial fraud/corruption.
Comment: Declares she would accept if the court forbade her from further filing. She admits she's using the lawsuit as a mean to educate herself in the field of law. Expressed distrust for US legal system therefore it's unlikely to be seeking justice in the court.

EDIT. Working on a compilation, this is just an example.
EDIT 2. Why nobody's giving me cool pseudonyms like this?
Demon Prince of Patriarchy, Mr. Deadpool
 
Last edited:
The site is loading like fucking molasses for me right now, but here's the message where Melinda Leigh Scott states her intention to file suit against Joshua Moon in Florida courts if her suit is dismissed in Virginia.
My name is Melinda, not Melissa.

I have 21 days to appeal this Order, which I will.

I have 14 days to file an additional response, which I will.

Don't celebrate too quickly. If this case is dismissed I'll simply re-file and serve Moon in Florida.

Don't be dumb now. You should know better that courts are slow and a long ride. I will exhaust every legal option.

Bye assholes
 
@Useful_Mistake Maybe you have the docs where those e-mails were attached as evidence? Ones where Raf offer to pay her one dollar :)

Found something really nice early in the thread:
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827028
Quote: "Call CPS and all I have to do is show them the screenshot of what you just said. It automatically dismisses the allegations under Virginia law."
Comment: Encourages and welcomes CPS call therefore can't claim the call happening caused her severe emotional distress.

EDIT. Working on a compilation, this is just an example.
EDIT 2. Why nobody's giving me cool pseudonyms like this?
That was adorable when she called him that! He used to have a great avi that went with it
 
That was adorable when she called him that! He used to have a great avi that went with it
You mean the one where he's drinking from a cup? Seen it in the thread. Dark Prince's shoops are what keeps my sanity while reading Mel's posts.

New stuff:
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5824288
Quote: "Second of all, The Torah does not command me to submit to worldly governments. More proof you worship Paul, not Elohim!"
Comment: Admission of not accepting secular law

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5825054
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5840566
Quote: "Israelites can steal the booty of their enemies."
Quote: "Nobody's said anything about stealing from pagans. What I said was ENEMIES. If you don't want your booty stolen, don't start shit and provoke an Isrselite. Enough said!"
Comment: Endorses theft and exortion of resources from her "enemies".

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5825206
Quote: " A corrupt justice system isn't failure."
Context: In relation to losing a lawsuit admits to not believing in justice in secular courts.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827028
Quote: "Call CPS and all I have to do is show them the screenshot of what you just said. It automatically dismisses the allegations under Virginia law."
Comment: Encourages CPS call therefore can't claim the call happening caused emotional distress

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827314
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5841064
Quote: "You mean GIVING A STALKER A PLATFORM TO HIGHLIGHT AND LIVE OUT HIS PLANS? That's not empathy, you're demonic and derranged!
See enclosed screenshot from my above comment in which The Stalker admits he used Kiwi Farms to further his stalking plans.
Some of you kiwi Farmers are just plain ole stupid."
Quote: "You feign empathy and concern, but what healthy well adjusted individual gives a Stalker a platform to continue to live out criminal and immoral behavior by lying, slandering, and attacking another person? What healthy well adjusted individual continues to allow a Stalker to commit violations of a Protective Order? You feign being an empathetic, morally upright group of citizens of society but the reality is Kiwi Farms did nothing more than aide and abet a criminal and immoral action."
Comment: Admits the goal of the lawsuits is to influence the way Mr. Moon moderates his forum.
 
@Useful_Mistake Maybe you have the docs where those e-mails were attached as evidence? Ones where Raf offer to pay her one dollar :)
That email was never made public, Mel publically submitted only a very small amount of emails
 

Attachments

Pages 1-200.
Those marked by three stars are rather clear - she admits she's filing those lawsuits for reasons other than seeking justice. The rest is, in my opinion, rather circumstantial.
Included posts where she contradicts claims made in the docs (like severe distress the thread causes her).
Archiving forum posts wasn't working for me today (neither .is nor .md) so that's to be done later.
Comments under entries are of course my comments and personal opinions or to be more precise: my justification to list those posts.

Link: https://twitter.com/MelindaLScott1/status/1409960936278986759
Link: https://twitter.com/MelindaLScott1/status/1409973831855394820
Archive: https://archive.md/3EEfM
Archive: https://archive.md/J3dZp
Quote: „This is such sad, unfortunate news. I have tried to sue Joshua Moon and get that site down. Hopefully the judges will do the right thing and take it down. How many more victims before the government does anything about that horrible site?!”
Quote: „Trying (to destroy Mr. Moon’s business -IOO)! I have sued him in federal court for a thread about me. 2 others as well. They are all pending cases. Let's hope a judge or 2, or 3 wakes up!"
Comment: Admits her goal is to destroy Mr. Moon's business.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/2020-12-07-scott-v-moon-mk-vi.80988/post-8461691
Quote: „I can completely mock Joshua Moon who is too illiterate to even file his own paperwork.”
Comment: Can be interpreted as filing lawsuit to mock the defendant

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5818791
Quote: „And I also propose a question to you, the question is twofold: (a) Do you know what the penalty is in The Torah for persecuting the Righteous? and (b) do you know when Elohim will pay out those penalities?”
Comment: Admits to wishing to ruin Mr. Moon's life for religious reasons and personal vengeance

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5824288
Quote: "Second of all, The Torah does not command me to submit to worldly governments. More proof you worship Paul, not Elohim!"
Comment: Admission of not accepting secular law therefore unlikely to seek justice through legal system

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5825054
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5840566
Quote: "Israelites can steal the booty of their enemies."
Quote: "Nobody's said anything about stealing from pagans. What I said was ENEMIES. If you don't want your booty stolen, don't start shit and provoke an Isrselite. Enough said!"
Comment: Endorses theft and extortion of resources from her "enemies".

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5825206
Quote: " A corrupt justice system isn't failure."
Context: In relation to losing a lawsuit admits to not believing in justice in secular courts.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827028
Quote: "Call CPS and all I have to do is show them the screenshot of what you just said. It automatically dismisses the allegations under Virginia law."
Comment: Encourages CPS call therefore can't claim the call happening caused emotional distress

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5827314
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5841064
Quote: "You mean GIVING A STALKER A PLATFORM TO HIGHLIGHT AND LIVE OUT HIS PLANS? That's not empathy, you're demonic and derranged!
See enclosed screenshot from my above comment in which The Stalker admits he used Kiwi Farms to further his stalking plans.
Some of you kiwi Farmers are just plain ole stupid."
Quote: "You feign empathy and concern, but what healthy well adjusted individual gives a Stalker a platform to continue to live out criminal and immoral behavior by lying, slandering, and attacking another person? What healthy well adjusted individual continues to allow a Stalker to commit violations of a Protective Order? You feign being an empathetic, morally upright group of citizens of society but the reality is Kiwi Farms did nothing more than aide and abet a criminal and immoral action."
Comment: Admits the goal of the lawsuits is to influence the way Mr. Moon moderates his forum.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5841382
Quote: "If the court believed they were "frivolous" they would have never allowed the to make it to the judge and they would have bared me fr further filing.
For one, the judge knew I was a former law school student, and that my legal education could be furthered by allowing them through
And two, the federal judge did not follow the rules of the court nor the laws. It's called judicial fraud/corruption."
Comment: Declares she would accept if the court forbade her forom further filing. She admits she's using the lawsuit as a mean to educate herself in the field of law. Expressed distrust for US legal system therefore is unlikely to be seeking justice in the court.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5841864
Quote: Under the law (which you may already know?), you can't sue a judge in a judicial capacity for a ruling. My only recourse is to (potentially) report the judge through the judicial complaint process.
(...)
If the pro-se forms mandate that a pro-se litigant cannot cite laws, that does not mean the judge can just omit relevant case law, which is what the judge did.
(...)
The lower courts also did not apply relevant case law which mandates that if a pleading has enough factual content, it should move to the discovery phase."
Comment: Pattern of using legal system as a mean of intimidation (in this instance: to intimidate judge to get favorable ruling despite admitting that unfavorable ruling was a result of her lack of legal knowledge)

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5843235
Quote: "In the past, libel laws were enforced to reduce the number of murders from duals. Historically, since the 1600s, men would have a dual (with guns) when another slandered or published libel against them. Since I care more about my family that sitting in a jail cell for murdering The Stalker or Mr. Moon, I won't be murdering them."
Comment: Admits to wishing to punish her opponents (including Mr. Moon) and using lawsuits as a "substitute for duel \ killing them".

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5846257
Quote: (when addressing Mr. Moon): "If it wasn't for the corrupt judicial system you hide behind, you'd be having to move out of your mommy's house to actually pay the people you harass. But your mommy obviously still cuts your chicken nuggets for you."
Comment: Admits financial motivation for the lawsuits. Expresses distrust for legal system therefore is unlikely to be seeking justice in the court.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5848238
Quote: "I clearly said I sued KF/Mr. Looney Mooney to further my legal education while I was out of law school. I clearly said I came here to guard the Torah. I clearly said "guard" did not mean "convert" or "save" others. I clearly said I study KF like a specimen. And I clearly said Im not a pacifist."
Comment: Admits she's using the lawsuit to educate herself in the field of law, not to seek justice.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5848499
Quote: "People sue people all the time to advance their legal education. Fresh lawyers, and even experienced ones, get corrected all the time. They use courtrooms and internships to gain experience. That's not "vexatious litigation", learn the proper definition of terms before trying to use them."
Comment: Admits she's using the lawsuit to educate herself in the field of law, not to seek justice.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5850739
Quote: "That's called trying to minimize abuse. In this case, verbal abuse. When you gossip, slander (through lovely), and lie about others, that's verbal abuse. You are uneducated and need a course on moral philosophy.
Your examples of the waitress and man aren't equal. Both of them were wronged first before they told something TRUTHFUL to another person in PRIVATE. This website has other factors that you ommitted."
Comment: Confuses morality \ ethics with law.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5859536
Quote: "Unfortunately, I've exhausted the only two options available to me (CDA violation and State actor). Both of which were mishandled by judicial fraud. I could report the lower courts judges under the official complaint system. If the complaint is found valid then it would make my original legal Complaints be reassigned to a new Judge who would re-determine the cases. I'm weighing the risks and benefits of that. Marshall doesn't believe anyone who is not "in the club" (not a Free Mason) can win at the Federal level and that I should not do it. To keep peace at home I might not
I have some other ideas to take out the site though"
Comment: Admits her goal is destruction of Mr. Moon's business.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5876919
Quote: "Secondly, a lawsuit doesn't mean my goal is to get people to "stop talking" about me. There you go assuming shit like always (more sign you are uneducated as fuck). The lawsuit was to remove DEFAMATORY content. And as I said before ON THIS THREAD, to use it as an opportunity to further my law school education while out of law school."
Comment: Admits she's using the lawsuit to educate herself in the field of law. Admits her goal is removal of information \ opinions.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5876919
Quote: "Not true at all. I have 2 (legal) projects in the works that have the potential to earn me between $250k-$1M. I don't need to compromise my morals to "get ahead". Same reason I didn't abort my children in the first place."
Comment: Admits her motivation for suing is financial.

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5876968
Quote: "Null attacked me first. You try to lie and act like posting an article with DEFAMATORY shit about me on March 13, 2017 was an act of benevolence. That's a twisted lie! Your initial KW article attacked me and then proceeded to give The Stalker a platform to live out his stalking lunacy. Mother fucker PA-LEASE, you're full of twisted lies"
Comment: Presents the lawsuits as a form of attack \ counter-attack

Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5898578
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5985259
Quote: "Nothing some idiot pagans say can bring Marshall or me pain. You're opinions are meaningless and worthless. I don't value your opinions at all. You're just a raging demon, like the Stalker. Must be all that porn you both watch, makes you pick up demons"
Quote: "The judgments of the loyal user base on Kiwi Farms are irrelevant to me. But I do find Kiwi Farms useful for debate and discussion about The Torah and moral philosophy."
Comment: Admits Kiwi Farms posts don't cause her distress but she finds the discussion interesting and intellectually stimulating, contrary to claims made in the filing.

*** Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5985647
Quote: "Although I did not get the ideal outcome in filing my lawsuits, I don't regret doing it. I got a chance to further my law school education while away from law school. I got a chance to voice my opposition using non-violent means. And I got a chance to see legal corruption at the Federal level which is a good opportunity for me to consider whether or not I want to really pursue a JD. Because although I saw legal corruption before that, I felt that by becoming a lawyer I could make things better for some and be a voice of opposition for social justice in my small corner of the world. But now I don't know because I wonder if the cults controlling the legal system are stronger than I first realized."
Comment: Admits she finds dismissed lawsuit satisfying and again points out at educational value of the court proceedings.
 
Last edited:
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5898578
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-5985259
Quote: "Nothing some idiot pagans say can bring Marshall or me pain. You're opinions are meaningless and worthless. I don't value your opinions at all. You're just a raging demon, like the Stalker. Must be all that porn you both watch, makes you pick up demons"
Quote: "The judgments of the loyal user base on Kiwi Farms are irrelevant to me. But I do find Kiwi Farms useful for debate and discussion about The Torah and moral philosophy."
Comment: Admits Kiwi Farms posts don't cause her distress but she finds the discussion interesting and intellectually stimulating, contrary to claims made in the filing.
This is actually a good one since it directly contradicts this lawsuit's claim of IIED.

Also if there are any more posts where she says that her goal was to remove defamatory content that she made after filing this action (June 2020), that would strongly support the accusation that she's attempting to re-litigate her previous failed lawsuits in bad faith rather than bringing a genuine and new claim of IIED.
 
  • Like
Reactions: No. 7 cat
This is actually a good one since it directly contradicts this lawsuit's claim of IIED.
Already found one more instance:
Link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-6019902
Quote: "My life isn't ruined by Kiwi Farms, an insignificant trashy pagan site nobody but the loyal user base cares about."
Comment: Admits she doesn't care what is said about her on Mr. Moon's forum.

Also if there are any more posts where she says that her goal was to remove defamatory content that she made after filing this action (June 2020), that would strongly support the accusation that she's attempting to re-litigate her previous failed lawsuits in bad faith rather than bringing a genuine and new claim of IIED.
I'm noting down pretty much everything that's at least in some way related to the lawsuit and motivation behind it, in chronological order. It'll be easier to remove notes later if someone (looking at you, @Useful_Mistake) points out they are irrelevant than to look for more.
 
@An0minous posted a link to this Canadian Judges ruling regarding a certain category of Vexatious Litigants over in the Russel Greer thread. It's fascinating read and seems to fit Melinda and the Mountain Jews to a T.
The Canadian judge who wrote the brilliant opinion in Meads v. Meads certainly followed these nutcases assiduously and the opinion is practically a primer on these arguments and why they are wrong.
I wonder if Skordas or the Judge have read it? Sadly I don't think its anything that can be cited in this case.
 
I've gone through pages 525-600 now.

**link:
"No, actually it NEVER says to obey the laws of the land. The Torah doesn't teach that. You're the fool trying to pretend you know anything about The Torah even though you don't! You don't follow The Torah and you don't even study it, you're just a presumptuous fool who thinks she knows what she is talking about!"
comment: Demonstrates that she feels her religious convictions mean she can flaunt the laws of the land. No respect for the secular government.

**link:
"So basically, in the USA, if you're a woman, or black, or hispanic, or poor, or not a Free Mason, you might as well just keep fighting for the inherent moral principle that it stands for, because you really have a slim change to win unless you're a white Anglo rich male. Just sayin' it like it is. The USA creates an illusion in elementary schools that we are the land of equal opportunity but that's not really true."
comment: She acknowledges that her case is unlikely to prevail, though she blames that on the bias of the judge and the system rather than on the deficiencies of her case. She states that even knowing she is unlikely to prevail, she thinks it's worth continuing to bring suits against Mr. Moon for the moral principle of the thing.


Not exactly on topic, but:

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7363004

comment: Part of bringing a meritorious case is having good faith that you are doing it correctly. Josh straight up tells Melinda that he doesn't live in Florida and she choses to disbelieve him because... reasons. Goes to her ability to claim that she had a good faith reason to believe he lives in Florida.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7398144

"SloberrinJ said:
The dismissals read that in every single one of your attempts to sue, you never had a claim. I'm not sure if you even know what that is, but it means that when you file a suit, you must, with each action, cite a case that supports your action. The Judge Parker and his clerks have repeatedly advised you of this in each dismissal, yet you've responded in kind by repeatedly filing another suit without a claim. Fact enough?


That's not a set of FACTs. That's called another hypothesis.

Here, let me show you how to write FACTS.

FACT 1: I have filed 10 pro-se cases in the Federal Western District of VA.
FACT 2: Each of the 10 cases filed were in DIFFERENT subject matter. POP QUIZ: Can you name each of the bodies of case law/law that they each were about?
FACT 3: "Failure to State a Claim" is a broad term that means you don't have all of the ELEMENTS and FACTS alleged to support the SPECIFIC type of law you are filing under.
FACT 4: One of the dismissed cases was dismissed because I didn't reach the $75,000 minimum
FACT 5: One of the dismissed cases was because I filed upon a Criminal statute, and I cannot do that as a civilian
FACT 6: Each of the other dismissals in my cases were in DIFFERENT subject matters for DIFFERENT reasons.
FACT 7: Two of my cases had no prior case law in the fourth district to rely on for a judgment. I broke fresh ground.


POP QUIZ: Name the reasons the other eight were dismissed."
comment: She doesn't accept that any of her previous dismissals mean that she should stop bringing suit. Instead, she demonstrates clearly that she believes all her suits are being dismissed over minor technicalities that, once she corrects, mean that she will win. Rather than contradicting her previous expressed opinion that she is unlikely to win due to bias, this instead explains the mechanism through which she sees the bias manifesting. The biased judge will find some nitpicky rule by which to throw out her lawsuit.


**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7400347
"Ok, let me show you the FACTS:

Case 1: Cyberstalking (2016) DISMISSED because: Criminal statute, civilian can't file

Case 2: Recovery of Child Support (2016) DISMISSED because: Did not reach $75,000 threshold

Case 3: Constitutional violations by CPS (2017) DISMISSED because: Eleventh Amendment Immunity
*First in the Fourth District to bring this subject to the table

Case 4: Constitutional violations by VA DMAS (2018) DISMISSED because: Eleventh Amendment Immunity

Case 4: Fair Housing violations by landlord (2018) DISMISSED because: Rule 5.2

Case 5: Scott v Moon (Defamation) (2018) DISMISSED because: "Rhetoric hyperbole"

Case 6: Scott v Moon (Tort) (2018) DISMISSED because: CDA 230 Immunity

Case 7: Scott v Moon (Injunction) (2017) DISMISSED because: Prosecutor implies Victim's rights
*First in the Fourth district to invoke this law

Case 8: Scott v Carlson (Video Copyright) (2018) DISMISSED because: No registration of copyright
*This case was the first in the Fourth District to bring this subject to the table

Case 9: ?


Case 10: Pending


Okay, so if you look:

--My cases in 2016, I was really "green" and new on this stuff. I made very basic errors like filing amount statutes and not filing using a criminal statute.

--My cases in 2017 and 2018 had *3* cases where there was no case law to refer to, the judge was setting new precedents. I knocked on their door and asked and got their rulings down for those particular laws.

--The others that fall under "failure to state a claim" were for DIFFERENT reasons in DIFFERENT areas of law. "Failure to state a claim" is a broad term that can mean many things. The reasons mine were dismissed were (a) a Rule 5.2 error (b) Eleventh Amendment Immunity issues and (c) "rhetoric hyperbole". Not because I didn't allege facts that I had my constitutional rights violated or proper facts in general."
comment: Same as above.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7433635

"I've won several cases at the state level.

Big federal courts are a different ball game. The thing about law is, it's all or nothing. Either you get it 100% or you're out. You can't do it 92%, or 95%, or 99%. I've gained more experience over the last few years, to work out the kinks in my pleadings.

The other issue is that some of the stuff I filed for had no precedent in the Fourth District. I was the first one to bring up the issues and file. So, when you are breaking new ground and asking a court to rule on an issue for the first time, there is a high chance for dismissal.

The third issue is that the Supreme Court of the United States cannot accept 100% of cases. Neither can the Supreme Court of Virginia. Unfortunately, social injustice cannot always be cured. They even say that on the Supreme Court website, that they can't fix of all society's wrongs because they can only handle so many cases."
comment: See above.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if Skordas or the Judge have read it? Sadly I don't think its anything that can be cited in this case.
This case is handled by Mr. Hardin :)

@ShinyStar
Archiving is working for you?
Would you be so kind to add a little comment stating why you find specific post relevant to the case? It'll make it easier to compile, clean up and categorize our findings.
 
I wouldn't say that archive is working so much as that I am attempting to use archive in the hopes that it ultimately will work... I believe that, in the future, if you take the /wip/ out of the address, it should link to the archived page. I could be wrong.

I really have to stop for now after this (I'm on page 624), but these pages are around the time that the case against Wise County gets dismissed. She seems to be talking a good deal about the lawsuit here, so starting at page 625 would be a good place to look for quotes.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7501589
ForscytheBat said:
Cope.
You still lost. All that matters is winning. It doesn't matter if you tried. As a matter of fact, it would be better if you never tried at all, because then you could look back and see two outcomes: a positive or a negative. If you lose, you look back and only see a negative. "At least I tried" is one of the biggest copes there is.


No actually it doesn't matter if you achieve the desired result. How you fight your battles is just as important.
comment: She doesn't believe it's important to win her lawsuit. She dismisses the idea that in the legal system, it is important to bring meritorious cases and instead believes that 'fighting your battles' is sufficient justification for using the court's resources and targeting an opposing party using the power of the State.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7532096
You over estimate the importance of this site. It's a fuck around site. Not worth my energy of getting mad
comment: She contradicts claims she made in her court case, admitting that the site isn't important and isn't worth getting mad about.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7547028
Spergichu said:
You know, if you could just understand basic legal practices and case law, the judges wouldn't have to dismiss parties from your suits.


Do you see it dismissed for not pleading well plead FACTS? NO, ya don't ...DUMMY

The entire pleading was dismissed on the grounds of Eleventh Amendment Immunity

Don't try to pretend you're an expert in Eleventh Amendment Immunity

Anyways, Im doing to Motion to Recuse the Judge for denying me the ability to amend the pleading to join in defendants. BIAS BIAS BIAS


Anonymus Fluhre said:
But I thought she learned from her past mistakes!



Do you see it denied for failure to plead well plead facts or infringement of federal rules? No, ya don't ....DUMMY
comment: Another post demonstrating that she thinks it is appropriate to continue to bring the same suit over and over as an iterative process to correct minor defects and ultimately prevail. She demonstrates that she has not received the message from the court that she has no case and should stop using the legal process to harass Mr. Moon.

**link: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/melinda-leigh-scott-marshall-castersen.32118/post-7551327
Don't want to brag or anything, but don't know if any of you legal buffs that actually read the Opinion may have noticed: the Judge didn't dismiss it for "failure to state a claim". He dismissed it under 12(b)(1).

My, my, I've come a long way 🤓
comment: Another post demonstrating that she thinks it is appropriate to continue to bring the same suit over and over as an iterative process to correct minor defects and ultimately prevail. She demonstrates that she has not received the message from the court that she has no case and should stop using the legal process to harass Mr. Moon.
 
Back