Skipping past the tiresome noble savage crap where he ignores how vigorously hierarchical both Aztec and Mayan imperial cultures were, to the point where sumptuary laws forbade non-nobles from wearing clothes woven from soft cotton instead of rough maguey fibers, or even *smelling certain wildflowers*, the idiot mashes together Aztec and Mayan cultural elements like a shitty Victorian-era fantasy writer.
I can't read his garbled "Aztec" phrases, beyond being able to tell pretty quick they're not classical Nahuatl (what the Aztecs spoke), but are probably words from a mangled Mayan dialect. While there was overlap between the Aztecs and Maya in their pantheons, they were *not* carelessly interchangeable, especially Huitzilopochtli, who was *the* national god unique to the Aztecs, and especially the Tenochca ethnic subgroup, who settled the capital Tenochtitlan. Invoking him in Mayan, a language of an ethnicity who didn't worship him at all, and that the Aztecs' sole concern with was as mercantile trading partners, is just stupid, and disrespectful to the differences of the two cultures.
Asking Tezcatlipoca to make you a "warrior for social justice" is comically stupid and shows zero understanding of the god. He's a mercurial god of fate and the primary trickster deity in that mythos. One of his titles is "The Enemy on Both Sides", to communicate how dangerous he is, and how unconcerned he is with mortals. Another of his titles is "He Whose Slaves We Are", to show how utterly powerless mere humans are against his decisions and actions. He's also the god of rulership, whose bestowed favor opens the door to entering the aristocracy or even kingship. He *is* the source of political hierarchical authority in Aztec imperial culture. Some loser crying and whining to him about the world being unfair would be literally laughed at (he's described as playing with mortals like marbles in his hand and laughing).
Quetzalcoatl is similarly hierarchical -- he's the divine source of priestly authority, and the main author of religious rules and strictures... including restrictions based on gender. While some gods had women somewhere in the religious hierarchy, Quetzalcoatl was noteworthy for having *no* female religious positions. Even Huitzilopochtli, the god of close-combat warfare, had female religious professionals.
As for Xipe Totec... yes, he was associated with healing and growth... but at a price. No one gets anything for free in the Aztec cosmos, to get life you have to pay life. His primary form of human sacrifice was by shooting the victims with arrows until they bled out, the running blood symbolizing the springtime rains that fed new vegetation and crops.
Bonus stupidity -- the Aztecs were notorious chauvinists themselves, and made the names of some of the outlying tribes that resisted subjugation like the Huaxteca shorthand for "butt-naked illiterate sex-crazed savages". Some cultural and religious ceremonies included characters that were essentially blackface-tier stereotypical portrayals of these outsider tribes. Super inclusive.
So basically, if you've made it this far through my sperging, this guy's a retard who's addicted to the noble savage copium and whitewashing the cultures he's crying about respecting and decolonizing, rather than letting the historical records and the cultures documented within speak for themselves. And he either can't, or doesn't care to, keep the regional languages he's parroting straight. Dumbass.
