UN says Cyber Violence is equal to real life violence.

Not kidding sadly.

A recent UN panel meeting, thoughtfully headed by some high profile SJWs, have announced that calling someone a name online is the very same as physically assaulting them in real life. Of course this type of cyber violence only happens to women as pointed out by the attendees. Men being the sole perpetrator of any violence are of course free from cyber violence because we all know that men never call each other names online, it's only women who suffer cyber violence.

Here is the link https://archive.is/mrVYv

Note this lovely article is published by Time magazine, the assistant sectary of the UN is the quoted source.

Here are some lovely captions from the conference;


I wish I was making this shit up....
 
Also her hair is ratty as fuck like if I were presenting at the UN I would probably wash my hair? And gurl you aren't fooling anyone with those extensions you could at least straighten your real hair so it kind of matches
 
Not kidding sadly.

This is the same UN that did sweet fuck-all while hundreds of thousands of Rwandans were hacked to death with machetes in the streets for being the wrong ethnic group, and the same UN that refused to even call it genocide.

It is an affront to sanity to put retards being made fun of on the Internet for saying stupid shit on the same level as genocide.

This is why the UN is considered a worthless talk shop.
 
Isn't this pretty much identical to when one of the rich white kids stood near a senator and said things nobody listened to and claimed it was "addressing congress"?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1 person
This is the same UN that did sweet fuck-all while hundreds of thousands of Rwandans were hacked to death with machetes in the streets for being the wrong ethnic group, and the same UN that refused to even call it genocide.
The UN cares about the more important attempted genocide against innocent white women that is gamergate. What Hutu Power did in Rwanda was potatoes compared to what Gamergate has done
 
So now that UN is into this mess, I guess they'll try to approach and help the victims of such horrible crimes. Probably the UN will open their own Tumblr account and give out notes in exchange of sex, same modus operandis as in Africa, right?.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Varis
So now that UN is into this mess, I guess they'll try to approach and help the victims of such horrible crimes. Probably the UN will open their own Tumblr account and give out notes in exchange of sex, same modus operandis as in Africa, right?.

There will be an unarmed dude in a light blue beret in front of every Internet terminal, who will cry and run away when you call him a faggot.
 
Here is why this is important and why you should care.

The UN is basically puppeteered by America. America controls basically all of the Internet and has like 4 times as many IP addresses as China. Even what resources America doesn't control, it probably has influence over because of the hardware that exists in its borders and what has to traverse it. Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn now represented in both Google and America, their influence and their ability to push this concept of "Cyber Violence" is growing.

The appropriate response, they say, to Cyber Violence is to censor the people who commit it. "No big deal, less death threats on the Internet. Cool." Except that the only way to enforce this is to end the idea that: he who posts the post, owns the post. Meaning, if you leave a comment on my website say "I am going to kill Christian Weston Chandler", it's your post and you are liable for it. Under the Anita Quinn Zoe Sarkeesian laws, I now own the post. Well guess what? On a website like this, I'm not going to carry all of your posts and be personally liable for it. The forum goes down. So does Encyclopedia Dramatica. So does 8chan. So does 4chan. Facebook, Google, and Twitter will immediately respond by cranking moderation up to 11 and deleting insensitive material.

If you're the kind of limp wrist, pencil neck cunt to see this and appropriate it to a fucking hashtag movement about video games, you are truly cancer and you are the reason why shit like this passes almost every single year. We are constantly losing our ability to speak our minds and nobody gives a fuck.
 
Here is why this is important and why you should care.

The UN is basically puppeteered by America. America controls basically all of the Internet and has like 4 times as many IP addresses as China. Even what resources America doesn't control, it probably has influence over because of the hardware that exists in its borders and what has to traverse it. Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn now represented in both Google and America, their influence and their ability to push this concept of "Cyber Violence" is growing.

The appropriate response, they say, to Cyber Violence is to censor the people who commit it. "No big deal, less death threats on the Internet. Cool." Except that the only way to enforce this is to end the idea that: he who posts the post, owns the post. Meaning, if you leave a comment on my website say "I am going to kill Christian Weston Chandler", it's your post and you are liable for it. Under the Anita Quinn Zoe Sarkeesian laws, I now own the post. Well guess what? On a website like this, I'm not going to carry all of your posts and be personally liable for it. The forum goes down. So does Encyclopedia Dramatica. So does 8chan. So does 4chan. Facebook, Google, and Twitter will immediately respond by cranking moderation up to 11 and deleting insensitive material.

If you're the kind of limp wrist, pencil neck cunt to see this and appropriate it to a fucking hashtag movement about video games, you are truly cancer and you are the reason why shit like this passes almost every single year. We are constantly losing our ability to speak our minds and nobody gives a fuck.
ily but this is like the most null post ever
 
Back