US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
So what I'm hearing is, European nations as well as Canada are so feeble and devoid of anything of worth in the 21st Century that they follow American culture like the sheep they are.

A bold claim at being absolutely pathetic, but it checks out.
that's straight up bullshitting right there...

...we followed your culture in the 20th. the 21st likely belongs to China.
 
Most of the things that were listed in @Hot Cup of Joe's complete capitulation to American superiority happened in the past 20 years, you ain't fooling anyone!
If you think any of those that i listed are superior, then you're a cold-faced liar.

Be it the jooz, free-masons, TPTB or world bankers, it doesn't matter. America is the HQ for all of the bullshit, fuckery and ruination of every good thing for the past 20 years. Even some of the redeeming features of America, have been ruined by America. Hollywood was pretty good post 2000, now it's cancer. Every form of media from gaming to music to TV to the internet has been ruined.

I mean fuck me, we're on an internet site hosted in Europe and Russia, because America throw an infantile tantrum because of mean words. The same website attacked by Troons (LGBTQ woke) using Twitter (American company) because a fag troon American faked his death.

Defending any of that in general is retarded, doing it on this website is :story:
 
Where we went wrong was the left decreeing that there's certain people you can't criticize or disagree with, certain opinions you're simply not allowed to have, which Anita Sarkeesian was the first major instance of that, Gamergate was just part 2.

Back in my day people would debate and hash things out till the cows come home, people disagreed often, but it was understood that people have a right to their own damn opinion without shit like deplatforming, that all started to change with Anita Sarkeesian.

Yes it's crazy that that's where it started and snowballed from there, but that's what happened, basically the left stopped wanting to play the game called "it's a free fucking country" and wanted control of absolutely everything and maybe it's high time we ask them the question "you and what fucking army?"

I saw that evolution firsthand as left wing people became meaner and meaner and less and less willing to communicate.
Fuck this resonates. Gamergate was the turning point where I decided to leave the blue shithole I was in and that no one around me was worth it. I have so many opinions that were fine in the ultra-left like anti-war and class grievances not based around race, and environmental concerns, etc. Fuck. But I knew the facts around Gamergate and when I communicated to lefties about what was really happening I just got branded sexist and problematic. I didn't even love video games at the time I just was adjacent to it.

It's cringe to say but it is burned into my memory in the same way that 9/11 was. 9/11 made me hate Bush & Co neocons and Gamergate 100% made me feel like I was in a left themed version of Arthur Miller's The Crucible. Things were never the same.
 
can I just note that I appreciate this dickwaving over how the world will end with america coming from an army of Shen-ji Yang AVs? I feel that's very apropos and will simply leave it at that.

Can we talk about Anthony Blinken completely fucking freezing when asked about his FBI interview regarding Hunter Biden?
was he too scared to even say this?
 
So... somewhat random question: we know that no Democrat-controlled state has told Biden to go fuck himself publicly over the federal vaccine mandate. But how many of those are actually going to make an effort to follow it? I can't see a lot of these states being able to enforce it either, so their best option is to voice support and then not do anything.
 
View attachment 2534150
...... ok what's going on? Normally I'd be happy about this, but these look more like the people that would vote for Biden rather than say the same things those damn "whyte supremacysts" would say, ESPECIALLY since it's the city.
Eh, I'll take it.
A find a lot of Brits have no idea how shrunk down their once world-spanning navy really is.
MuQF59fiIcAMd2Jqk1L21YOKRuPUwUmdjBO17uaKvZc.png
So... somewhat random question: we know that no Democrat-controlled state has told Biden to go fuck himself publicly over the federal vaccine mandate. But how many of those are actually going to make an effort to follow it? I can't see a lot of these states being able to enforce it either, so their best option is to voice support and then not do anything.
It's pretty much just been individual cities as far as I can tell.
 
I gotta say watching the shenanigans of the old senile pervert and his handlers had been pretty depressing but watching these eurocucks scream about how the rotting corpses of their empires and cultures are still relevant and they totally aren't just glorified client states to the US has been a real pick me up. Thank you.

Also I kind of remember a particularly not good orange man wanting to cut US troop presence in Europe and all the euro governments threw a fit about having to pay for their own defense being left undefended against Russia.


Additional fun fact about the US Navy. There are 32 aircraft carriers in the world. The US owns 16 of them.
 
So... somewhat random question: we know that no Democrat-controlled state has told Biden to go fuck himself publicly over the federal vaccine mandate. But how many of those are actually going to make an effort to follow it? I can't see a lot of these states being able to enforce it either, so their best option is to voice support and then not do anything.
I would not be surprised if all of the inspectors (or whatever hacks the admin sends to laughably try and enforce this farce) will steer totally clear of the dem states, allowing them to just leave it entirely to the corporations to do whatever they please there, and will instead all be sent into the ones that expressed open defiance to try and rack up casus bellis to try and crucify them as much as possible in the court of public opinion via the media (as opposed to actual court, where they'll lose horrifically).
 
Also I kind of remember a particularly not good orange man wanting to cut US troop presence in Europe and all the euro governments threw a fit about having to pay for their own defense being left undefended against Russia.
I remember that. It was so weird watching them try to explain why they hated Trump and how they thought he was some nuke happy warmonger, but they still wanted him to have troops under his command in their country.
 
That dress and that ticket, together, cost more than a shitload of hard working people earn in a year.

The sheer hypocrisy of this woman, her supporters, and the people like her are astounding.

Be honest, how many of you, if given that ticket, would return it for cash and pay off a shitload of stuff on your house, car, whatever?
We've known for a long time about her love for expensive fashion. This was mentioned in the Squad Thread when she did a big photoshoot with 'working class' Americans.
1631581538667.png
1631581545600.png

So really, I'd like to hear some descriptions of the "magazine shoot" process for politicians that includes the clothing being provided.
I'm sure since this is such a commonplace occurrence there's some trade journals discussing the unique challenges a print magazine (or a photographer, or whoever is supposed to do this) faces in the storage and maintenance of these large wardrobes. Those must be interesting reads for tips at how to do the best at this very real process.

For some of the big magazines, wardrobe is provided for celebrities and other VIPs by fashion design houses or their PR/media arms who rightly view the spread as a form of advertisement. Every now and then you'll hear funny little stories about such-and-such director or actor walking off with a three thousand dollar tie they liked or something, which get no complaints because its more free advertising. This is particularly rampant with fashion, lifestyle, and entertainment magazines like GQ.

I don't think that this suit was provided by Interview however. There isn't a fashion consultant listed, which is what I normally see when the wardrobe is provided - they would coordinate the outfits and work with the fashion designers. Second, she's wearing the same outfit in multiple photographs spread over several locations and times - if it was provided they often do several outfits or mix up accessories. Thirdly, her outfit isn't described in detail as is typically done when this is the case - if it was provided for free as advertising the designers would be namedropped. Again, this is based after my long experience with men's fashion magazines, but if you look at other articles from the same magazine you see consultants, different outfits, and explicit details.

She wore her own suit.

Edit: Since I don't want to subject you to their website or give them clicks, here is a comparison.

Other Articles

1631581645501.png


Her Article
1631582048705.png


Again, there is no way those cunts at Manolo Blahnik provide shoes and don't get name-dropped. They wouldn't allow it.
 
Last edited:
We've known for a long time about her love for expensive fashion. This was mentioned in the Squad Thread when she did a big photoshoot with 'working class' Americans.
View attachment 2534323View attachment 2534324


For some of the big magazines, wardrobe is provided for celebrities and other VIPs by fashion design houses or their PR/media arms who rightly view the spread as a form of advertisement. Every now and then you'll hear funny little stories about such-and-such director or actor walking off with a three thousand dollar tie they liked or something, which get no complaints because its more free advertising. This is particularly rampant with fashion, lifestyle, and entertainment magazines like GQ.

I don't think that this suit was provided by Interview however. There isn't a fashion consultant listed, which is what I normally see when the wardrobe is provided - they would coordinate the outfits and work with the fashion designers. Second, she's wearing the same outfit in multiple photographs spread over several locations and times - if it was provided they often do several outfits or mix up accessories. Thirdly, her outfit isn't described in detail as is typically done when this is the case - if it was provided for free as advertising the designers would be namedropped. Again, this is based after my long experience with men's fashion magazines, but if you look at other articles from the same magazine you see consultants, different outfits, and explicit details.

She wore her own suit.

Edit: Since I don't want to subject you to their website or give them clicks, here is a comparison.

Other Articles

View attachment 2534329
jOATFiY.png

Her Article
3Nf28Jw.jpg
View attachment 2534340


Again, there is no way those cunts at Manolo Blahnik provide shoes and don't get name-dropped. They wouldn't allow it.
Somehow, the shoes are the cheapest part.
 
So... somewhat random question: we know that no Democrat-controlled state has told Biden to go fuck himself publicly over the federal vaccine mandate. But how many of those are actually going to make an effort to follow it? I can't see a lot of these states being able to enforce it either, so their best option is to voice support and then not do anything.
My employer hasnt said a thing about the mandate. nor has anyone else that i have seen.
 
View attachment 2534150
...... ok what's going on? Normally I'd be happy about this, but these look more like the people that would vote for Biden rather than say the same things those damn "whyte supremacysts" would say, ESPECIALLY since it's the city.
Probably people that believed "my body, my choice" only to find out "women only have control over their reproductive organs, the rest is up for grabbin'."

Hardcore Branch COVIDians cannot figure how that backfired Elmer Fudd style on them.
The left has no one but themselves to blame for this situation, you don't go calling half the country Nazis for years and then turn around and expect them to do what you say with regards to vaccines etc.

Think of how easy it instead would have been for the left to just accept that they have to share this country, I mean what's the fighting really all about? What profound difference does it make to some butt fucking Than Franthisco resident that in other parts of the country things are different? There's a hilarious irony here that the US is such a massive country with plenty of room for many different types of people, but no, the left wanted it all, they got greedy, so fuck 'em.
They don't consider anyone with different opinions to be "people." I was seeing the argument that "America is Huge, we need to airlift every Afghan that wants to come here." Kinda just ignoring that, you know, people might live where you are dumping these people and would object to having refugees shoveled on them.

Nor does the left understand logistics. Or resource management. Or culture.

Basically a college education has lobotomized these people.
 
We've known for a long time about her love for expensive fashion. This was mentioned in the Squad Thread when she did a big photoshoot with 'working class' Americans.
View attachment 2534323View attachment 2534324


For some of the big magazines, wardrobe is provided for celebrities and other VIPs by fashion design houses or their PR/media arms who rightly view the spread as a form of advertisement. Every now and then you'll hear funny little stories about such-and-such director or actor walking off with a three thousand dollar tie they liked or something, which get no complaints because its more free advertising. This is particularly rampant with fashion, lifestyle, and entertainment magazines like GQ.

I don't think that this suit was provided by Interview however. There isn't a fashion consultant listed, which is what I normally see when the wardrobe is provided - they would coordinate the outfits and work with the fashion designers. Second, she's wearing the same outfit in multiple photographs spread over several locations and times - if it was provided they often do several outfits or mix up accessories. Thirdly, her outfit isn't described in detail as is typically done when this is the case - if it was provided for free as advertising the designers would be namedropped. Again, this is based after my long experience with men's fashion magazines, but if you look at other articles from the same magazine you see consultants, different outfits, and explicit details.

She wore her own suit.

Edit: Since I don't want to subject you to their website or give them clicks, here is a comparison.

Other Articles

View attachment 2534329
jOATFiY.png

Her Article
3Nf28Jw.jpg
View attachment 2534340


Again, there is no way those cunts at Manolo Blahnik provide shoes and don't get name-dropped. They wouldn't allow it.
all that money spent on fashion...and none on fixing her horrendous horse teeth...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back