2020-12-07 - Scott v. Moon Mk VI(?)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Illuminati Order Official said:
Something that makes me wonder regarding the case: is it normal to respond to a motion that's already granted? I mean the time extension.
Click to expand...
She mails her motions. By the time she sent it it was likely not granted yet, but by the time it arrived, it was already granted.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Drowningman, Flim Flam, Shaka Brah and 1 other person
Useful_Mistake said:
Yeah, same. Correct me if I'm wrong, but he didn't cover much of anything recent from Russ and Mel, bar the "Mel is appealing? Not in that way ew" video
Click to expand...
I think trying to read Mel's last filing broke him... err made him even more broken. Trying to read through this one would put a devout Mormon well on the way to alcoholism. This filing is like a do it yourself lobotomy kit.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Botchy Galoop, Drowningman, Illuminati Order Official and 1 other person
RodgerDodger said:
I think trying to read Mel's last filing broke him... err made him even more broken. Trying to read through this one would put a devout Mormon well on the way to alcoholism. This filing is like a do it yourself lobotomy kit.
Click to expand...
He has covered every Melinda and Russ filing from both sides of the aisle. But you see, he live streams about 4 or 5 shows a week that run about 3 hours each. He also makes 5-10 short vids on specific issues per week. It can be easy to miss the relevant stuff if you aren't paying attention.

I'll say this about Rackets, he's a workhorse. I would never give him money or anything but I respect his grift. I just tend to value those who aren't driven by money (i.e. Jersh) over those who are.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: The Worm Ouroboros, AStupidMonkey, Drowningman and 6 others
Cynically Insane said:
He has covered every Melinda and Russ filing from both sides of the aisle. But you see, he live streams about 4 or 5 shows a week that run about 3 hours each. He also makes 5-10 short vids on specific issues per week. It can be easy to miss the relevant stuff if you aren't paying attention.

I'll say this about Rackets, he's a workhorse. I would never give him money or anything but I respect for his grift. I just tend to value those who aren't driven by money (i.e. Jersh) over those who are.
Click to expand...
It was more fun when he wasn't so engaged with his "community" and all the legal activism and just talked about retarded lawsuits in decently sized videos. I loved his Greer Saga and early Melinda stuff but the whole superchats thing is grating when it breaks up the pacing so much. The sad thing is though, short documentaries and informative videos are content YouTube doesn't like. So anyone who wants to make money doing content (and I'm sure he does) won't do them because they kill your channel's visibility.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: The Un-Clit, Illuminati Order Official, Bloitzhole and 2 others
Useful_Mistake said:
She mails her motions. By the time she sent it it was likely not granted yet, but by the time it arrived, it was already granted.
Click to expand...
Other way around. The court gave an order granting the motion for extension on Sep 9, the day before she signed her reply, Sep 10. But by the time she got the order in the mail she'd already mailed her reply.

Order: 1631596544345.png
Reply: 1631596600353.png


If she was paying attention to the case online she wouldn't have to wait around for orders to get to her in the mail, just saying... (documents on PACER are only $0.10 per page up to a $3.00 max and if your quarterly balance is under $30 it's waived, and RECAP mirrors the documents for free as soon as someone has purchased them)
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: The Un-Clit, AStupidMonkey, Drowningman and 3 others
Does “open” mean (1) they are administratively considering allowing her to appeal, (2) that she has been granted permission to appeal / can present arguments to be assessed for an appeal ruling but no decision has been made about changing the judgement, or (3) the appeal is allowed and ruled on. I am pretty sure it’s not (3). I am hopeful it’s (1), ie “we gotta acknowledge we received this crap and we aren’t allowed to just point and laugh her but must use our words like adults”
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Illuminati Order Official and Flim Flam
Kendrick said:
So the appeal is open? Does that mean Moon's motion for "pay up front or shut up" was denied?
Click to expand...
It only means that the appellate clerks are doing their job. It means that her appeal has been received and docketed. It doesn't mean her appeal has been approved yet, or anything as such.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist, Drowningman, Illuminati Order Official and 4 others
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt and Useful_Mistake
Calling it now. She's going to appeal the demand that she pay the appeal bond. Funny story. The 4th circuit may actually take it up just so they can create some guiding precedent for dealing with this vexatious scenario. It won't cost Null anything as her argument would solely be with the Court.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: polyester, AnOminous, Kosher Salt and 2 others
Null's new motion.

Edit: New docs (1, 2)

Edit: New new docs

Edit: New Mel docs

Edit: New doc from Mel

Edit: New docs. Hardin claims this appeal will cost Null, at least, $9250.30, and so he asks the appeal bond to be this high as well

Edit: Hardin replies in Appellate Court

Edit:
Null1.png
null2.png
null3.png
Null4.png

Edit: New docs!

Edit: New doc

Edit: New Motion by Mel

Edit: New Mel docs. Very spicy

Edit: Melinda's back.

Edit: New doc.

Edit: New docs by Null. Images.

Edit: New docs

Edit: New docs

Edit: New doc by Null

Edit: New docs by Mel.

Edit: Mel's back

Edit: New docs by Null

Edit: New docs

Edit: New docs

Edit: New docs by Mel

Edit: New doc by Null

Edit: New Mel docs

Edit: New Mel Docs by Hardin

Edit: New appellate docs by Hardin

Edit: New Mel doc

Edit: New Mel stuff

Edit: New docs by Hardin

Edit: New Mel Appellate docs

Edit: New Mel doc

Edit: New motions by Mel after the judge told no more motions (plus Hardin's doc in the appellate court)

Edit: Hardin responds to Mel's latest motions

Edit: Reply by Hardin in the appellate court

Edit: Judge makes another ruling, Mel suffers another loss

Edit: New Mel doc in the appellate court

Edit: Hardin replies in the appellate court
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Anstiv, mindlessobserver, polyester and 5 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back