US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
CarlosDanger said:
Manchin is a Democrat in a state where every single county voted for Trump in 2016 and 2020. Manchin is seen more as a "blue dog" Democrat, although that is typically a designation in the House, he fits the definition, which is a more conservative leaning Democrat. They used to be more of a presence, but a lot of them were taken out after the Obamacare fiasco, where a lot of them fought against a lot of the provisions but were threatened to vote for the bill, then Pelosi basically left them to die during mid terms.
Click to expand...
When you put it like that, it sounds like a baby version of Stalin's purge of his officers. Their concerns were valid given how badly Obamacare failed as a policy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager, spiritofamermaid, AnotherPleb and 3 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
Gents, at this rate, what are the odds of Trump 2024?
Click to expand...
He is definitely going to run. I am being bombarded with contribution emails. His chances depend greatly upon how profoundly the Biden admin continues to fuck up and the cascading effect that has on the Dems at a local level. But this is Clown World. Could be Kanye 2024 for all I know.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: dry roasted, like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Confused Doggo and 9 others
Unreal. I would give them the benefit of the doubt, but it is Biden we're talking about. If nobody can see it, it doesn't exist, right?

Screenshot_20210916-212632.png
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, not william stenchever, Francis York Morgan and 24 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
No need to wait, I can tell you where this goes.

Child abuse. Lots & lots of child abuse. Child abandonment too.

I just can't wait to hear all the stories of fire departments being inundated with unwanted babies⸮ How exciting⸮

Oh & we're headed into an economic crash as well, no? Excellent timing, child abandonment flies high during economic strife.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I'm sure there's tons of stories of orphans and people who come from abusive home who outright say they wish they were aborted.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Dislike
Reactions: silverstacks, Yamma Damma, Foreverial and 10 others
Reminder that 90% of the abused and damaged kids filling up the adopt/foster system were born from lower-class mothers who chose to carry to term and also have produced 5 kids by 8 possible sperm donors.

Most of the would-be normal adoptable orphan infants got aborted by antinatal feminist mothers who are too good for birth control.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Francesco Dellamorte, Foreverial, DicksOutForChauvin and 16 others
Clockwork_PurBle said:
Reminder that 90% of the abused and damaged kids filling up the adopt/foster system were born from lower-class mothers who chose to carry to term and also have produced 5 kids by 8 possible sperm donors.

Most of the would-be normal adoptable orphan infants got aborted by antinatal feminist mothers who are too good for birth control.
Click to expand...
I'm sure those demographics won't budge.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, DicksOutForChauvin, Randall Fragg and 4 others
Clockwork_PurBle said:
Reminder that 90% of the abused and damaged kids filling up the adopt/foster system were born from lower-class mothers who chose to carry to term and also have produced 5 kids by 8 possible sperm donors.

Most of the would-be normal adoptable orphan infants got aborted by antinatal feminist mothers who are too good for birth control.
Click to expand...
Tbf, I'm sure a lot of said antinatal feminists would probably just troon out kids they were 'forced' to have.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Red Sun, DicksOutForChauvin, Blasterisk and 8 others
Iceland Heavy said:
The Soviets did violate the Molotov Ribbentrop pact by annexing a bit of land between Romania and the Ukraine that was agreed to be in Germany's sphere of influence, but Stalin wasn't going to make a move against Germany in 1941, his officer ranks were still reeling from the Great Purge and Finland had seemingly revealed the immediate post-purge Red Army to be a laughably incompetent mess. Germany struck because they needed the food and oil and thought the Soviets would simply collapse if they encircled and destroyed enough armies and took Moscow. Once they didn't Germany's many logistical deficiencies doomed them in the long run.
Click to expand...
Hitler had a very decent chance of winning against the communists, but his policy of genocide against civilians SEVERELY backfired. Before they drove the civies back into the arms of Stalin, the nazis were greeted as full blown liberators, with flowers and everything. They could have fermented a civil war in russia if they played their cards right. Unfortunately Hitler for all his based aspects, was still a genocidal asshole at heart.
Tree said:
France had taken territory from them that they wanted back, Hitler did not intend to subsume France more than that. Russia was planning to attack Germany, it was an open secret for months before Germany made the first move, if it could even be called that. It's not easy to say which side instigated conflict, as one of Hitler's primary goals, for which he had even asked for Britain's allegiance, was to put Russia in its place. Hitler (correctly) saw this as a good for all of Europe, yet (((for some reason))) the rest of Europe was convinced otherwise. Even before Hitler, Russia had threatened Europe for a long time and everybody knew it was a major force behind Bolshevism and related evils.
Click to expand...
I suspect public opinion of the Russians was influenced by the all the sympathizers and spies they embedded literally everywhere. Seriously the soviets had the best, most reliable spies of the war, it's just that Stalin was too much of a paranoid tard to trust them. I remember they had one guy working in German high command they lost contact with after the purge, that they never got back in contact till AFTER the war.



1631848445035.png


1631848572668.png

mistake. Your done Lindsey.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/sen-l...h-communist-china-to-subvert-president-trump/
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Jann_Hörn, Oats12345, Yamma Damma and 21 others
  • Feels
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Francesco Dellamorte, Red Sun, Yamma Damma and 9 others
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Francis York Morgan, Yamma Damma, Saints Suck and 9 others
Michael Wade said:
Hitler had a very decent chance of winning against the communists, but his policy of genocide against civilians SEVERELY backfired. Before they drove the civies back into the arms of Stalin, the nazis were greeted as full blown liberators, with flowers and everything. They could have fermented a civil war in russia if they played their cards right. Unfortunately Hitler for all his based aspects, was still a genocidal asshole at heart.
Click to expand...
You could easily say that Hitler did more to turn the average Russian into a Communist fanatic ready to die for his motherland even more than Stalin ever could.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: Emperor Augustus, DicksOutForChauvin, Cyber Floyd and 9 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
Funny you should mention that.
Childhood maltreatment is linked with suicide ideation.
View attachment 2544289
Click to expand...
Cool graph. People commit suicide for all manner of reasons, and not even giving them the chance to choose it themselves later in life to begin with is what makes this a retarded statement to make as any kind of argument against what you quoted.

Find me the people who say they'd rather have been aborted, and a study on how large that percentage is of people who would've been aborted otherwise, and you might have an inkling of a salient point. Otherwise, you just have a graph with a comical lack of nuance and an article that suggests such things might be part of why people commit suicide, an incredibly complex topic.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: silverstacks, thyme's up, Red Sun and 9 others
LurkTrawl said:
Cool graph. People commit suicide for all manner of reasons, and not even giving them the chance to choose it themselves later in life to begin with is what makes this a retarded statement to make as any kind of argument against what you quoted.

Find me the people who say they'd rather have been aborted, and a study on how large that percentage is of people who would've been aborted otherwise, and you might have an inkling of a salient point.
Click to expand...
This is a nonsensical counterargument, here I have a study showing that yes, people who were abused as children idealize suicide. "Oh, they didn't specifically idealize abortion in particular so suicide doesn't count."

What is the tangible difference between wishing you were aborted & wishing to kill yourself?
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Red Sun, DuckSucker, Justa Grata Honoria and 1 other person
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
This is a nonsensical counterargument, here I have a study showing that yes, people who were abused as children idealize suicide. "Oh, they didn't specifically idealize abortion in particular so suicide doesn't count."

What is the tangible difference between wishing you were aborted & wishing to kill yourself?
Click to expand...
The mother wanted her child to not exist.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: dry roasted, Clockwork_PurBle, Blasterisk and 4 others
Corn Flakes said:
The question is, who will be taking his place?
Click to expand...
Isn't the district Anthony Gonzalez is retiring from being eliminated due to districting in 2023? If that's the case, that would mean no one would be taking his place.

It needs to be said, but the redistricting benefits Democrats overall. Most of the districts cut are Republican. With Newsom outperforming expectations on surviving recall, this is a warning to Republicans to step up their game or else, Democrats will expand their majority in the House and Senate. Oh and the DNC will cheat too.

Every candidate that has a Democratic running needs to fight like they are forty points behind. We learned with the Newsom recall that pollsters will manipulate polls to galvanize their base and will do so at the latest possible moment to make Republicans complacent. They will do this for governors, local, House, Senate, and president race going forward. Cover every base or the GOP will lose.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Oats12345, beef lo mein, Cyber Floyd and 8 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back