Hell, even when i give my buddies a good night kiss on the lips is still not gay and these lunatics want to make talking other man a homo thingFellas is it gay to talk to a guy? You are literally building a relationship with a MAN after all
Wait, so they literally know the Mary Sue writes biased and opinionated articles but they are still approved? Shouldn't that mean outlets like Breitbart are also approved? They write opinatied right-leaning articles but are factual.
Breitbart isn't only not allowed, its URL is blacklisted.
I always liked the way ED lampooned these, by linking quotes to "Liar" and so on.
As an example, thread was started here on their article from yesterday:
They do good coverage on Ukraine related topics. I wonder what Wikipedia would think if you cited them as proof that the Russian invasion was partially caused by Ukraine and NATO, that Ukraine shot down flight MH17, that the Ukrainian government since 2014 was brought to power by a US-backed fascist coup, or any number of topics like that?
I know we already mock Wikipedo for being really biased, but the fact that they won't even humor one of the most established center-right publications while treating leftist blogs as acceptable sources is outright damning.
It's gender affirming care now bigot.
I will continue my practice of just calling it genital mutilation.
There was one Larry Sanger was trying to get off the ground: Citizendium. Real-names only for users and a much more detailed review process that includes scientists checking the articles. Sadly AFAIK it stands mostly abandoned.
