Fewer Young men are having sex, why? - And why the sex disparity?

You can't serve God and mammon both, mammon being money.
Do you live in fantasy land? Money is evil but you need at least some of it to live nowadays. If you don't have money, CPS will come along and make sure you don't keep those kids anyways. Pumping out kids into poverty and homelessness like the most backwards social classes in the poorest parts of Africa does not make you a virtuous person. This worldview tracks with your previous posts though, so I shouldn't be surprised.
 
I think you are severely and purposefully understating the burdens of having an unwanted, unplanned pregnancy while in your teenage years. And you've decided to die on this hill, for some reason.
Valuing a career making powerpoints or shuffling papers for some pointless bureaucrat position for $75k a year over the life of the child you created will never not be a completely retarded take. Most people have regular people jobs. None of them are worth killing a child over.

Carry on.

There are many women who have an abortion despite only having a few sexual partners. The narrative that every woman who gets an abortion is a "slut" is completely insane, inaccurate, and destructive.
Because every woman who gets an abortion is usually a careless slut. I have multiple children and my woman has never had an abortion in her life. But I knew careless sluts in university and such that had three or more abortions in just a few years.

How is it so hard?
 
The correct answer is to have more kids. If you're married and you get pregnant its a blessing not a curse. God wants you to have more kids so have more kids
Then I pray for God for mercy on those families that are suffering.

And he is a God of mercy.

As did I.
You asked someone else. And why? Because your arguments smell like someone who thinks marriage is some prevention to abortion. It isn't.


Again, you're just being stupid and argumentative. Pro-life values are not the cause of misery, sin is. Stop being retarded.
it literally is causing misery

You're right, the 1.5% were the rape and incest exception, not the fetal health exception.
You're obviously wrong regarding mercy killings. It's rooted in the perspective of someone that cannot imagine any fate worse than the inability to consoom. If we have the right to kill people to spare them their own miserable existences because "we know better", then I'd spend my free time blowing away left lane campers.
What, no death for the cancer ridden elderly who literally want a mercy death? You sadist you.
 
I think you are severely and purposefully understating the burdens of having an unwanted, unplanned pregnancy while in your teenage years. And you've decided to die on this hill, for some reason. Having a child takes a lot of time and money. How is a likely single mother going to afford rent? How is she going to work a full time job? How is she going to afford daycare? Where is she going to get the money to afford diapers, and formula?

Wow, being a single mom sounds really tough. Sounds like that if there's no abortion, your only realistic choice is to keep your legs closed.
 
You are living in a time of global depression and a cost of living crisis.
During the Fall of Rome, people kept having kids. In fact, they kept having kids through the Black Plague and other such societal calamities. Even during the Great Depression, people were still having large families. I'm not saying you should go full Duggar mode, but to not have kids because of a transient event is poor planning on your part.
Kids are a blessing, but contraception is sadly necessary if you don't want to collapse your family finances.
You can also just cut back on non-essentials hard. The truth is most people live above their means to an irrational degree. You don't need the newest iPhone or desktop/laptop or those superfluous decorations noone will notice anyways. You don't need to buy things that don't have a direct use and you can start a system of passing on hand-me-downs from one child to another in terms of clothes and the like. For entertainent, you don't need to be super spartan, but you don't need the newest PS5 or whatever. Books, physical equipment like a jumprope or Legos/Barbie dolls and maybe an old computer/game console so the kids can have some fun isn't irrational. Plus, it forces them to interact with one another and develop basic social skills, something a lot of kids lack today. Even with the older computer, you can make it into an educational tool given the right software and parental controls.


Outside of shit like death or a natural disaster, you can manage a somewhat large family if you put actual energy to raise them and also connect with your parents and use them as babysitters. That's historically what happened, so why do we think we aren't subject to these basic laws of human interaction?

Use contraception if you must, but not chemical contraception. That's literal poison and causes mental and hormonal imbalances in women to their detriment. It's not even a theological argument, but finishing on the outside or in your wife's mouth won't have any long term effects compared to chemicals that trick your wife's brain to think she's constantly pregnant when she's not, which is obviously unhealthy. The other obvious answer is to practice chastity and continence since that always works, but I'm being realistic by saying that most people can't do that easily if at all. The first answer is what I plan on practicing with any woman I marry along with rhythm methods
 
Last edited:
You can also just cut back on non-essentials hard. The truth is most people live above their means to an irrational degree.
The median home sales price in the USA is $420,400 and that's including all the shitholes. Stop acting like you're a geriatric retard because this crisis is not about buying less Starbucks coffee. People need homes and they cannot buy them anymore. Food prices are spiking even in Russia. Do you plan to feed your children using only food banks while being homeless?
 
Pumping out kids into poverty and homelessness like the most backwards social classes in the poorest parts of Africa does not make you a virtuous person
They're jealous of Africa because they wish the West was as behind as it is
The pro lifers in this thread are genuinely so far far behind on basic logic them being alive shows how sometimes abortion is the right option
 
Last edited:
They're jealous of Africa because they wish the West was as behind as it is
That mentality has already left Africa outside of the most underdeveloped regions. Somehow the retardation has been transferred from the most backwards countries of the world into the heads of Western autists who pray for neo-feudalism.
 
For entertainent, you don't need to be super spartan, but you don't need the newest PS5 or whatever.
God wants you to have more kids so have more kids.
Still no peanuts.. *sigh* Being a dogmatic moron incapable of receiving new information seems like fun sometimes. I wonder why women aren’t partnering with males who want them to have as many children as possible with no out and who think the cost of living crisis is about irresponsible luxury spending? Really puzzling.
 
Do you live in fantasy land? Money is evil but you need at least some of it to live nowadays.
There's a difference between prioritizing life over money and opposing the existence of money entirely. I am not saying people should willfully drive themselves broke, but I am saying that there are a lot of luxuries that you could do without before you decide not to have kids over monetary concerns.

Also, there are natural ways to reduce the odds of pregnancy when married couples have sex. The most obvious one is right after she's had her period you've got a good week or so before theres any real chance of ovulation. Obviously its not 100% effective but neither are contraceptives, or abortions for that matter, and if she still gets pregnant then God really wanted you to have that kid.
If you don't have money, CPS will come along and make sure you don't keep those kids anyways.
Doesn't seem to happen with ghetto welfare queen niggers.
This worldview tracks with your previous posts though, so I shouldn't be surprised.
My worldview is based on consistent religious values. I realize that's a rarity on the Internet.
You asked someone else. And why? Because your arguments smell like someone who thinks marriage is some prevention to abortion. It isn't.
Marriage is not some kind of magical abortion stopper, but if everyone refrained from premarital sex there would be less demand for abortions. The majority of abortions are performed on single mothers.
it literally is causing misery
>If you don't let us outright murder babies some of them might die anyway!

What an absurd argument.

Still no peanuts.. *sigh* Being a dogmatic moron incapable of receiving new information seems like fun sometimes. I wonder why women aren’t partnering with males who want them to have as many children as possible with no out and who think the cost of living crisis is about irresponsible luxury spending? Really puzzling.
Being a condescending retard doesn't make your shitty arguments in favor of child murder and promiscuity any better.
 
The young women with colored hair screeching "a kid? In THIS economy?" never considered a kid in their fucking life. I've seen enough women have 3 kids by 25 with an unreliable father to know that if you want a kid, you're having a kid. Having a kid is life-affirming to many women. They feel validated and as if their goal in life has been completed. It's not an accessory to your instagram. At least here in the first world, two people can work literal bottom wage jobs and have a kid and a car, and not a bad one either. Having a kid if you truly want it is 100% possible-

But what these women hear when you talk about "having a kid", is "me being impregnated and having to deal with it myself" cause that's a lifestyle they already live and know the outcome of. Notice how it's never about starting a family, only having a kid. They could marry someone who makes more than them (most women do). They could get a man who is able to grift and hustle the means to have a kid.

But the equation starts and ends with "me, a single person, pushing out and caring for a child". Cause that's how lonely a life they live.
 
There's a difference between prioritizing life over money and opposing the existence of money entirely. I am not saying people should willfully drive themselves broke, but I am saying that there are a lot of luxuries that you could do without before you decide not to have kids over monetary concerns.

Exactly. It is true that the cost of living is rising in America, but it's also true that we're not poor. The following are luxuries:
  1. Smartphones and tablets
  2. Delivery (GrubHub, DoorDash, etc)
  3. Recreational travel
  4. A home theater system
  5. Streaming services
  6. Restaurants
  7. Ready-to-eat foods
  8. Meat twice a day
  9. Coffee & tea
  10. Dessert
  11. Any beverage that isn't water
  12. Floofy smelly woman bath stuff
  13. Video games
  14. A home computer less than 7 years old (you really do need ready access to email in the 2020s)
  15. A yard
  16. More than one car (in most places in America, you really do need a car to hold down employment)
  17. A gym membership
  18. More than a couple changes of clothes
  19. Working only one job
  20. 500 sq ft of living space per person
Children, by contrast, are not a luxury. Children are a requirement for survival. There is nothing that is more important, not even your own temporary survival as an individual. There are animals that give their lives to spawn, while white people say "nooooo I can't have children, I'd have to start cooking food from raw ingredients every day, noooo." Literal jungle savages who don't even have pants or permanent shelters reproduce. American niggers who live like animals reproduce.
 
This is why the Woke Left is a death cult. By abandoning children you are abandoning your own principles. As you are not cultivating the next generation to uphold them but instead dooming them before they were even born. All because they inconvenience you and the hedonistic lifestyle you think is the most important thing in the history of ever.

I am just a few years away from no longer needing to work. All because I long ago figured out how little I actually need the nonsense people are consumed with these days. Yet I want for nothing. I make coffee only at home, I have an old phone I got used, I cook 99% of what I eat at home from raw ingredients, and so on. If you take up these things you suddenly find yourself with far more disposable income than you had before. I even maintain a gym membership, video games, and other luxuries I don't need.

There absolutely are ways to reduce costs while understanding that COL is indeed extremely high.
 
Last time I used tinder, the only people who wanted sex were people who used the app solely for one night stands.

Would YOU stick your dick in that?
 
This part of your post is stupid. Jerking off more or less does not affect your ability to get a girlfriend. Sloth doesn't stop you from getting a girlfriend.

Wrong. Sexual drive (which is muted by constantly jerking off to porn) is a key factor in making men put themselves out there with women, putting themselves in uncomfortable positions, doing the things necessary to end up with a woman. When you sit around jerking off online all day you have significantly reduced the sexual drive and removed yourself from the situations where you'll come in regular contact with women. And here's another thing you may not know, women can sense that shit. They've evolved to detect sexual drive (as desirable) as well as sexual resignation (as undesirable).

"I'll just bust a nut on pornhub and play vidya" is not going to improve your success rate with women. This shit ain't rocket surgery. Your ancestors going back thousands of years had no problem getting laid, so maybe look at your approach since that's the only thing that has changed..
 
Back