Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
View all 11 filings

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
— Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)
View all 30 filings

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) PDF
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) PDF
View all 50 filings
Sneed Force One said:
Imagine demanding to rezone someone's private property without even informing them. What did Greer think was going to happen?
Click to expand...
Isn't he currently in the process of filing lawsuits against Gilman to force him to sell his plot of dirt to him completely oblivious that land is also currently blocked by state law from opening a new brothel because in 2009 a bunch of mexicans turned a fucking carpet store 2 blocks away from it into a Church?

Yes I've been doing the fucking research to determine how long these peices of land have been haram yet here this slack jawed fuck doing all this bullshit

By the way, Scott Shady Court? The Methodist church that makes that 100% haram has been there since NINETEEN FOURTY-SIX, ALMOST 80 YEARS.
 
m1ddl3m4rch said:
as is his won't
Click to expand...
In the words of another pop starlet: "Oops, I did it again."
nop.webp
 
Silver Coin Anon said:
I suppose dismissal is the sensible, quickest, and best remedy but I have this itching hope he manages to violate something so substantial that it enters court recommendation for criminal prosecution. I guess contempt would be the most any could hope for such a pitiful retard.

I'll keep visualizing it while rubbing magic quartz crystals and reading horoscopes in hope.
Click to expand...
Anything criminal would more likely arise on the state level out of his grand brothel empire dreams. More and more he is moving beyond "local lunatic shouting at clouds" and dancing ever closer to actual fraud.

Or he's going to get popped locally for something insane and stupid involving whores. Or 9 or 10 hotness Door Dash delivery customers that he starts creeping on.

The Federal Courts will just wash their hands of him. Hit him with fees and fines and rejection. They are not going to be interested in prosecuting him.
 
Silver Coin Anon said:
Which options would these entitites have to remedy the situation? Which options would a supposed defendant have to remedy the situation?
Click to expand...
obsdj said:
If it's determined that IFP status was obtained by fraud, the remedy is dismissal of the case. US code states that the court SHALL dismiss the case -- not "may" do so, but SHALL dismiss -- if it's determined the allegation of poverty is untrue, as we've mentioned a few times in this thread previously.
Click to expand...
The Magistrate Judge ordered Greer to pay the filing fee which should have resolved the issue. Of course Russel is refusing to pay the fee which opens a can of worms, and there is the fact that the District Judge used IFP status to grant a lower sanction.

This allows Hardin to show all of the scummy things Russel Greer is doing in relation to his brothel. If Greer had paid the filing fee close to when he was ordered and the District Judge hadn't made his retarded motion with IFP front and center then there would be less reason for the court to even care as the issues wouldn't exist.

But Greer being the retard that he is has left an opening for Hardin to attack him in by playing games with the filing fee.
Silver Coin Anon said:
I'll keep visualizing it while rubbing magic quartz crystals and reading horoscopes in hope.
Click to expand...
That's Greer's secret weakness that will assuredly work unless he hires a goth prostitute who is into crystal healing.
he who has thus come/gone said:
The IFP fraud should really be the center of a motion to dismiss, pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 1915(e)(2)(A):
Click to expand...
That is what Hardin is likely angling for as he likes to have several methods of getting this case dismissed all at once.
There is a motion to dismiss because of the inability for Russ to serve the other defendants in his amended complaint, there is fact the case will be dismissed if Greer doesn't pay the filing fee, and now there is likely going to be a motion to dismiss concerning Greer lying about IFP and in general lying to the court.
 
Napoleon III said:
There is a motion to dismiss because of the inability for Russ to serve the other defendants in his amended complaint, there is fact the case will be dismissed if Greer doesn't pay the filing fee, and now there is likely going to be a motion to dismiss concerning Greer lying about IFP and in general lying to the court.
Click to expand...
There are also the multiple and escalating Sanctions Motions. The potential of which are dismissal with prejudice.

And the Court does not have to simply pick one. It can grant multiple motions/reasons for dismissal. And all would need to be successfully appealed indivually. If one stands the case is still dismissed.
 
Checking the timing on the meeting minutes.

1747846919456.webp

1747847481148.webp


This is NV time, which is 1 hour behind Utah time. So Russ was in the meeting somewhere from 2:00 PM to 2:50 PM Utah time; we know he spoke because the minutes include things the powerpoint does not (like being unable to purchase the Scott Shady wing). His proposal shows up as the 2nd business item after some light housekeeping, so he probably spoke early on.

I don't remember the exact time for the Court hearing, but I think it was 1:00 to roughly 1:45 Utah time. If that's right, then Russ got lucky and got out of his pesky Court-mandated hearing just in time to do his brothel pitch, probably within 15-30 minutes.

Also, assuming the Greer emails Null posted are in NV time, that puts 3 emails occurring during the Court hearing, 2 sent from him.

1747848155505.webp


He tells Ruth "Ok, I will be there" at 1:19 PM Utah time, halfway through the Court hearing. Four minutes later he emails to ask "Can you push it to the end of the meeting? I’m on a business call." He got no response, and now we can see that they didn't push it to the end of the council meeting, it was near the start. So if the Court hearing had stretched another 20 minutes, he would have been screwed.

[Late edit after Null posted the video]: Looks like his item actually came up 33 minutes into the meeting, the mural discussion took longer than I estimated. So Russ had more time to spare before he talked, but didn't know that would be the case during his court hearing. He still had to rush to get into the council meeting before it started.

If this was anyone but Greer, I would consider the following question too retarded to ask... but it is worth wondering:

Did Greer only tell the judge he could pay the filing fees because he was rushing to end the hearing, to make his brothel pitch on time?
 
Last edited:
Napoleon III said:
There is a motion to dismiss because of the inability for Russ to serve the other defendants in his amended complaint, there is fact the case will be dismissed if Greer doesn't pay the filing fee, and now there is likely going to be a motion to dismiss concerning Greer lying about IFP and in general lying to the court.
Click to expand...

Hardin has already mentioned this in ECF 289 (requesting extension of time to reply to Greer's opposition to the Motion to Dismiss):
1747848752000.webp

I love how he stressed the MANDATORY nature of the dismissal three times. Suffah judge, the US Code says you SHALL dismiss, fuckers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom