David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Case: 2:24-CV-00140, Southern District of West Virginia. - Acerthorn sues the Farms

Stebbins v. Moon 2:24-cv-00140 — District Court, S.D. West Virginia

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00140
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. West Virginia
  • Filed
    Mar 20, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    May 3, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC, David Stebbins

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 39)

# Date Description Filing
43 May 3, 2026 TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE OF APPEAL TO 4CCA via APPEAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA. (lca)
42 May 3, 2026 NOTICE OF APPEAL by David Stebbins as to 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Attachment: # 1 Envelope) (lca). PDF
41 Apr 26, 2026 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 29 Objections are OVERRULED; the 24 Proposed Findings & Recommendation is ADOPTED; the 1 APPLICATION by David Stebbins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs is DENIED; this case is DISMISSED without prejudice unless the Plaintiff pays the filing fee within 30 days of this order; the 34 First Amended Complaint is STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 4/27/2026. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)
40 Apr 7, 2026 CLERK'S ORDER. Pursuant to 39 Order, the referral of this civil action is transferred from Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 4/8/2026. (cc: Magistrate Judge Tinsley; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc) PDF
39 Apr 7, 2026 ORDER directing that this matter be transferred to Rory L. Perry, II, Clerk of the Court, for reassignment to another Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/8/2026. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca) PDF
View all 39 filings

In re: David Stebbins 26-1398 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-1398
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Filed
    Apr 6, 2026
  • Last Filing
    May 4, 2026

Parties (1)

Parties
In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 17)

# Date Description Filing
17 May 4, 2026 RESPONSE/ANSWER by David A. Stebbins to Motion to dismiss appeal [15]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001972939] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:58 AM]
16 Apr 29, 2026 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to Motion to strike [14]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001971074] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:12 PM]
15 Apr 28, 2026 MOTION by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to dismiss appeal [15]. Date and method of service: 04/29/2026 ecf. [1001969770] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/29/2026 12:56 PM]
14 Apr 22, 2026 MOTION by David A. Stebbins to strike brief Motion to Strike Docket Entry #13, the Defendant's Reply to my Response to their Motion to Reconsider.. Date and method of service: 04/23/2026 ecf. [1001965881] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:50 PM]
13 Apr 22, 2026 REPLY by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to response [12].. [1001965846] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:16 PM]
View all 17 filings

David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon 26-1556 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-1556
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Filed
    May 4, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    May 4, 2026

Recent Filings

# Date Description Filing
4 May 4, 2026 RECORD requested from Clerk of Court [1001973037]. Due: 05/19/2026. [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/05/2026 09:26 AM]
3 May 4, 2026 INFORMAL BRIEFING ORDER filed. [1001973035] Informal Opening Brief due 05/29/2026. Informal response brief, if any: 14 days after informal opening brief served. [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/05/2026 09:24 AM]
2 May 4, 2026 FEE NOTICE issued to David A. Stebbins - initial notice. Fee or application to proceed as indigent due 06/04/2026. Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. [1001973033] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/05/2026 09:22 AM]
1 May 4, 2026 Case docketed. Originating case number: 2:24-cv-00140. Case manager: CHalupa. [1001973000] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/05/2026 09:07 AM]
View full docket
I think we are still waiting for the District judge to rule on the findings of the Magistrate for the In Forma Pauperis application by Stabby. The court is apparently treating this case with the alacrity its merits deserve.
 
mindlessobserver said:
I think we are still waiting for the District judge to rule on the findings of the Magistrate for the In Forma Pauperis application by Stabby. The court is apparently treating this case with the alacrity its merits deserve.
Click to expand...
Aren't we closing in on the one year anniversary of that initial IFP filing? This has to be a record for slowest IFP consideration.
 
I hate when you guys shitpost in this thread

I see a nice notification about a new Mr Stabby post, get all wet and excited about more crazy Stabby lolsuit filings going up but it turns out it's just a bunch of numbnuts trying to be funny.

Son I am disappoint!
 
Sweeter and Savoury said:
I hate when you guys shitpost in this thread

I see a nice notification about a new Mr Stabby post, get all wet and excited about more crazy Stabby lolsuit filings going up but it turns out it's just a bunch of numbnuts trying to be funny.

Son I am disappoint!
Click to expand...
stabby will read the posts and get mad about it though. worth.
 
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TIME, BABY
Screenshot 2025-07-25 181726.webp
 

Attachments

This fucking non-aware idiot.
1753457381227.webp

Greer v Moon racking up those citations, baby!
1753457437617.webp

Kind of leaves out an important fact about the Florida jurisdiction saga, doesn't it?

1753457553867.webp
:story:
 
Here's all 7 of the alleged libel claims.
2025-07-25_08-37.webp
2025-07-25_08-37_1.webp
2025-07-25_08-37_2.webp2025-07-25_08-38.webp
2025-07-25_08-41.webp
2025-07-25_08-38_1.webp
2025-07-25_08-38_2.webp
They all sound true to me.

And, once again, time travel appears in a federal court case.
2025-07-25_08-43.webp
 
I noticed something... there's no proof of service that I can see in the docket, was Moon ever even served? For that matter was Lolcow LLC even served? I mean he may have waived that by having his lawyer reply for "Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC"
The "Stebbins tries to serve Moon" arc would have been extra funny considering Moon's location at the time.
 
1753459203457.webp

NOOOOO STALKER CHILD,
He wanted to give it to them as a gift, and he wanted Taylor to acknowledge him (not a date tho)!

Alright guys, see you in a year for the next filing.
 
4090 Chad said:
It’s going to be really funny when the judge reads those and ultimately concurs with Null.
Click to expand...
I don't see how a judge can see two courts slapping Ace with vexatious litigant status, and conclude "Ace files frivolous lawsuits" is anywhere near libelous. Even if Josh was wrong and Ace really is an innocent justice seeker, it's a very reasonable conclusion for Josh to draw.

Also, I can't wait for the lolbertarian argument that a person may, in fact, choose to enter into voluntary contract to become a slave. Therefore Jones is a legally bound slave, Stebbins is a slave owner, and libel counts 3-4 get thrown out. Start scribbling, Hardin!
 
I like how the envelope is covered in shit like always. Such a messy FAT RETARD WHO STABBED HIS FATHER IN THE FACE BECAUSE THE INTERNET WAS TOO SLOW
 
Useful_Mistake said:
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT TIME, BABY
Click to expand...
This is some top tier law lolcowdom. This is obviously not going to work. Acerthorn put time and effort into amending his complaint and he is just going to get slapped with a we didn't give you permission to do this denied lol.
DavidS877 said:
I noticed something... there's no proof of service that I can see in the docket, was Moon ever even served? For that matter was Lolcow LLC even served? I mean he may have waived that by having his lawyer reply for "Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC"
Click to expand...
I mean you can't just file an amended complaint. The court has to give you permission.

Harvey Danger said:
Greer v Moon racking up those citations, baby!
Click to expand...
The funniest thing is I'm pretty sure defendant gets their home jurisdiction as preferred jurisdiction. Also funny that he isn't even citing the most egregious part of Greer v Moon but the fucking weird as jurisdiction shenanigans
 
DavidS877 said:
Please let the District Court Judge wake up and rule on the IFP recommendation.

Anyway.
Single PDF and Images
View attachment 7690453View attachment 7690454View attachment 7690455View attachment 7690456View attachment 7690457View attachment 7690459View attachment 7690462View attachment 7690463View attachment 7690465View attachment 7690467View attachment 7690469View attachment 7690470View attachment 7690471View attachment 7690472View attachment 7690473View attachment 7690474View attachment 7690475View attachment 7690476View attachment 7690477View attachment 7690478View attachment 7690479View attachment 7690480View attachment 7690481View attachment 7690482View attachment 7690483View attachment 7690484View attachment 7690485
Click to expand...
TLDR: Acerthorn files paperwork that reads like it was written by a grandmother on Facebook where he bitches about Null complying with a DMCA takedown request and encouraging his userbase to utilize Fair Use when criticizing a gobbling face stabber.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom