Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More than just pushing away his friends, he openly preys on the charity and compassion of strangers by pretending to urgently need financial assistance which he uses to sustain a decadent lifestyle based around ceaseless, empty consumption. Charitable people are very likely to become far less charitable when they discover that their acts of charity have been wasted on unnecessary luxury items for an obese sociopath who jerks off to cats.As I am sure you know, but to share it with everyone else, Cuckoo chicks will also push other eggs out of the nest, and literally eliminate any sort of competition. Lou pushes everyone out and away from his nest, I wonder if he dislikes his nephew so much because his nephew is taking resources that could be HIS?
Oh my fucking god I absolutely hate this. It's like every time we mock Lou for getting a shit commission he takes it as a challenge to waste money on an even worse one. Aside from the fact that that looks absolutely nothing like a lion, I am infuriated that the artist just threw up a mirror plane and then only drew half the face and head. The only thing conpletrly drawn out is the hair. I know it's a "symmetrical commission", but it makes the drawing look even cheaper, shoddier, more awkward, and doofier. Above all, it just looks lazy. I don't know about furfag anatomy, but it's also way too narrow and the spacing is all off (I blame the mirroring)View attachment 1549664
A tiger...? Look, I might not be a animal expert or anything, but this looks nothing like a Tiger. A mouse, or perhaps a deer. But a TIGER?
Fuck it, maybe it's a donkey. It would fit Lou more than anything else. Or maybe it is an elusive Snipe?
I was born with crossed eyes. I underwent four eye surgeries before I was a year old to cosmetically correct my eyes (I still don't have true binocular vision). This recent artistic trend of cutesy cartoon strabismus fucking triggers me.View attachment 1549664
A tiger...? Look, I might not be a animal expert or anything, but this looks nothing like a Tiger. A mouse, or perhaps a deer. But a TIGER?
Fuck it, maybe it's a donkey. It would fit Lou more than anything else. Or maybe it is an elusive Snipe?
That's fair, but I'm of the opinion that it's a bad idea for an artist to offer something of an intentionally poor quality for a cheap price in order to make a quick buck. My reasoning is this: when the person you drew it for shows off the commission, they aren't likely to always put the price next to it every time they post it. That means that the low level of quality then becomes associated with the artist's name, because that's what people are seeing, and most people wouldn't consider the circumstances of that piece. Additionally, since low effort pieces take less time, the artist then has a larger footprint of poor quality work as opposed to what is truly representative of their skill. That's why most artists charge per foundational tier (sketch, lineart, color, etc.) as opposed to just charging "per effort" like in this case. Reputation is really importsnt to artists, so offering shoddy work for cheap seems like a bad plan in the long run imoNot to white-knight the artist or anything, but I really can't blame them very much for the questionable quality of Lou's commission. After all, Lou only paid them $5 for the picture, so I think it's fair to say he got what he paid for; a quick slapped-together attempt at a headshot.
I'm no artist myself, but I'd assume that for most of the ones who take furry commissions, the more expensive the commission was, the more effort I'd put into it.
Oh my fucking god I absolutely hate this. It's like every time we mock Lou for getting a shit commission he takes it as a challenge to waste money on an even worse one. Aside from the fact that that looks absolutely nothing like a lion, I am infuriated that the artist just threw up a mirror plane and then only drew half the face and head. The only thing conpletrly drawn out is the hair. I know it's a "symmetrical commission", but it makes the drawing look even cheaper, shoddier, more awkward, and doofier. Above all, it just looks lazy. I don't know about furfag anatomy, but it's also way too narrow and the spacing is all off (I blame the mirroring)
Also, the ears look like Shrek's
Edit: What the fuck is going on with the mouth, by the way? Is it smiling and are those light spots teeth, or is it the bottom of the snout? If it's the boyyom of the snout why tf is there a pointy ass chin way farther down? Whatever it is, it makes me uncomfortable
The Shrek ears are appropriate since Louie is a fat, disgusting ogre with a small brain.
Cunt don’t you fucking dare be insulting my man Shrek like that. Shrek is a hard working and wholesome family man.
Lou is a Farquad, a repulsive and petulant dick that lives opulently at the expense of everybody else and gets violently angry when his ego isn’t stroked.
Uber feminist and strong, powerful woman Lou Gags doubles down on his misogynist slurs
View attachment 1551202
Lou lectures Mike Pence about lying (how is your 'dead' mother doing Louis?)
View attachment 1551203
Good god, that's unprecedented levels of edge. How can he think saying this in a public space is acceptable, especially when his name and face are attached to it?Uber feminist and strong, powerful woman Lou Gags doubles down on his misogynist slurs
View attachment 1551202
Lou lectures Mike Pence about lying (how is your 'dead' mother doing Louis?)
View attachment 1551203
Bolded sentence/paragraph starting letters?Granted, I'm more upset that I need to now figure out how to edit "is a misogynist" into an OP that's already at the text limit.
Good god, that's unprecedented levels of edge. How can he think saying this in a public space is acceptable, especially when his name and face are attached to it?
Granted, I'm more upset that I need to now figure out how to edit "is a misogynist" into an OP that's already at the text limit.
Those a Jerry's ears from Tom and Jerry.Not to white-knight the artist or anything, but I really can't blame them very much for the questionable quality of Lou's commission. After all, Lou only paid them $5 for the picture, so I think it's fair to say he got what he paid for; a quick slapped-together attempt at a headshot.
I'm no artist myself, but I'd assume that for most of the ones who take furry commissions, the more expensive the commission was, the more effort I'd put into it.
>Israhell is an apartheid stateUber feminist and strong, powerful woman Lou Gags doubles down on his misogynist slurs
View attachment 1551202
Lou lectures Mike Pence about lying (how is your 'dead' mother doing Louis?)
View attachment 1551203