- Joined
- Sep 29, 2018
>Chief Censor's Office
jesus christ how horrifying.jpg
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
>Chief Censor's Office
jesus christ how horrifying.jpg
NYT:
Police officials say it took 36 minutes from when they received the first call about a shooting at a mosque to when the suspect was taken in custody.
“That is an incredibly fast response time,” said John Price, commander of the district police. “You have a mobile offender across a large metropolitan city, and I am very happy with the response of our staff.”
lol, 36 minutes a guy is shooting innocents = "an incredibly fast response time"
Every IP packet has a source address field. You can put whatever you want into that field. However, when you set it afloat on the internet, every intervening device has the option to critically examine it.I could have sword I had heard of researchers spoofing IPs in a BitTorrent swarm to prove they aren't reliable... making it look like a law enforcement agency was in the swarm or something. I can't find it now.
You can taste that saltHi Josh
Appreciate your quick response.
Will definitely consider what you have said.
Regards
John
All IPs are owned by someone. The "someone" is often an ISP. ISPs keep records on which IPs they loan to which person at any given time.
VPN IPs are owned by the VPN. If they got a VPN, no harm no foul, they just toss out that IP. (Or maybe they could pester the VPN company for a customer lookup, but many of them don't keep records to forestall that.)
IPs can't be faked, necessarily. They just might not be useful. But they certainly might be useful.
Fuck, man. You've got balls of steel.
I could have sword I had heard of researchers spoofing IPs in a BitTorrent swarm to prove they aren't reliable... making it look like a law enforcement agency was in the swarm or something. I can't find it now.
No. Strolling onto someone's website, located in an entirely different country than yours and expecting the lead admin to hand over confidential info because you're with the popo requires balls of steel.
my guess is that they want it censored because his manifesto is full of heavy redpill/blackpill content, and they want to prevent that stuff from spreading.Imagine trying to ban a video that will let everyone know exactly what went down and how horrible it was. The video and manifesto turned the attack from a list of numbers and a title to the inner workings of a demented person who went out to kill innocents. People can only benefit from being able to access it.
Also about the email footer you guys are all spazzing about, it's talking about if you weren't the intended recipient, or if you were but then you share something sensitive (evidence attached for you to comment on / explain, for example).
To be fair, they censored out the actual shootings. They had one shot of a muslim on the floor as he walked towards the hallway through the smoke. Sloppy editing.Not only do they allow 9 news to publicise the video of the shooting, but it's actively promoted to me by youtube. The gate keeping is so incredibly clear.
![]()
Video in question.
my guess is that they want it censored because his manifesto is full of heavy redpill/blackpill content, and they want to prevent that stuff from spreading.