2020-12-03 - FBI inquiry into post threatening political violence

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm guessing he thought it was implied. The class clown of sorts. "Demoncrats" being the joke spin. But there ARE people that think that way.

No wonder the Internet is regulated like it is. It's hard to distinguish reality and a joke.
In context, he's lampooning the angry doomposting of the thread by taking it to the edgy extreme. Out of context it apparently looked like a real threat, sadly.
 
In context, he's lampooning the angry doomposting of the thread by taking it to the edgy extreme. Out of context it apparently looked like a real threat, sadly.
If you were Null, faced with legal action on a regular basis because of your identity and user traffic, and the FBI comes to you with a post under your domain, what would YOU do?
 
Benny_with_Maria.png

POV: You are @SIGSEGV
 
If you were Null, faced with legal action on a regular basis because of your identity and user traffic, and the FBI comes to you with a post under your domain, what would YOU do?
If I ran the site I'd have already sold all of your information to anyone willing to pay for it
To clarify, I'm not criticising Null for banning him, just sad it came to it
 
In context, he's lampooning the angry doomposting of the thread by taking it to the edgy extreme. Out of context it apparently looked like a real threat, sadly.
In other words, it takes a fucking fed to think that post was serious.

What type of data did null give away though? Name, email and IP?
 
He's in more strife than flash gordon
 
I've always wondered if that was an actual legal defense.
Someday at a watercooler in the FBI HQ
"Hey Gary, remember that retard who thought he could get away with his plotting by adding 'in minecraft' to everything he said?"
"HAHAHA! Yeah, that was a fun one, the fucking face he made dude! I love this job."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back