2020-12-07 - Scott v. Moon Mk VI(?)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not aware of any civil cases, but I heard a story about a patent attorney who was suspended from filing and prosecuting patents before the USPTO. He would still practice and represent clients before an examiner by coming up with a dependent claim, adding himself as an inventor, and then proceed as an Inventor instead of a Patent Attorney. He would then drop his dependent claim and remove himself as an inventor once the notice of allowance was obtained. The USPTO eventually stopped him.

Melinda could try something similar in theory, but in reality it would end up being slapped down hard by a judge very quickly. Ideally during the start of the IFP process. I'm shocked that this lawsuit made it through the IFP process to even require an answer, but it's likely due to the Federal Claims, which could possibly be a cause of action if she could sue that office.
She got IFP because she was suing the State first and foremost. I'm general, the courts are very deferential to an IFP tort if the defendant is the Government. With this prejudicial dismissal though she is pretty much on notice this shit will not fly anymore. If she files a 7th lawsuit Dear Leader will have grounds to take her to the mat and request everything from a restraining order barring her from suing him again without special leave of the court to attorneys fees, costs and special damages that can include the cost of every one of her prior lawsuits.

When this has been pointed out to Melinda in the past she just laughed and claimed even if this did happen she was so fucking broke there would be nothing to collect. But there is ALWAYS something to collect. For example, while Virginia does not allow you to seize someone's home in collection, you CAN seize their car. And if that does not discharge the judgement when they buy another car to replace the one you took you can seize that too. The phone that she uses to post on this forum is also siezable, as are any subsequent phones. Her stank ass panties are seizable.

Even a poor fag can be made to suffer. It may not discharge the cost of the seizure let alone the judgement, but if Null wanted to make an example he could absolutely hurt even the most broke of IFP litigants.
 
Has anyone checked the Wise Co obits? He could have killed her for all we know. Alternately, DSS could have seized the kids and Mel's in jail for shooting at Marshall.
I think @Rod Dangerous was keeping up with her social media. And I suspect if one of them fatally hurt the other nobody would know for some time. They seem to be rather reclusive so I doubt anybody would go looking for them.
 
So, she used Ty Beard as her attorney?
Screenshot_20210901-162601_Drive.jpg
Screenshot_20210901-162653_Google.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: AmarettoPie
It is my opinion based entirely on Kiwifarms posts that Melinda Scott is an unfit mother. She's vicious, nasty, entitled and really really fucking dumb. Her children are in danger every moment they are in her custody. CPS should remove her children from her care at once.

Now that I've stated that publicly using an IP address that my ISP have me, I'm going to stare at my vast piles of Jew gold held in my enormous Scrooge McDuckian vault.

Melinda, send service to my attorney, Mr Lionel Hutz, I can't believe its not a law firm, Springfield Mall, Springfield, Oregon.

Also Melinda is fat, unattractive, and it would give me great pleasure to read about how she killed herself and her children by locking them in a car and driving into a lake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back