- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
She got IFP because she was suing the State first and foremost. I'm general, the courts are very deferential to an IFP tort if the defendant is the Government. With this prejudicial dismissal though she is pretty much on notice this shit will not fly anymore. If she files a 7th lawsuit Dear Leader will have grounds to take her to the mat and request everything from a restraining order barring her from suing him again without special leave of the court to attorneys fees, costs and special damages that can include the cost of every one of her prior lawsuits.I'm not aware of any civil cases, but I heard a story about a patent attorney who was suspended from filing and prosecuting patents before the USPTO. He would still practice and represent clients before an examiner by coming up with a dependent claim, adding himself as an inventor, and then proceed as an Inventor instead of a Patent Attorney. He would then drop his dependent claim and remove himself as an inventor once the notice of allowance was obtained. The USPTO eventually stopped him.
Melinda could try something similar in theory, but in reality it would end up being slapped down hard by a judge very quickly. Ideally during the start of the IFP process. I'm shocked that this lawsuit made it through the IFP process to even require an answer, but it's likely due to the Federal Claims, which could possibly be a cause of action if she could sue that office.
When this has been pointed out to Melinda in the past she just laughed and claimed even if this did happen she was so fucking broke there would be nothing to collect. But there is ALWAYS something to collect. For example, while Virginia does not allow you to seize someone's home in collection, you CAN seize their car. And if that does not discharge the judgement when they buy another car to replace the one you took you can seize that too. The phone that she uses to post on this forum is also siezable, as are any subsequent phones. Her stank ass panties are seizable.
Even a poor fag can be made to suffer. It may not discharge the cost of the seizure let alone the judgement, but if Null wanted to make an example he could absolutely hurt even the most broke of IFP litigants.