Rejected! 2021-08-31 - Isabella Loretta Janke (via attorney): A courtesy request.

[Feline Supremacist]

She's disgusting filth and a sociopath that tortured animals to death for pleasure, murder is only a matter of time for her. Don't delete.

Also ignore the Streisand effect at your peril.

 

[AngeloTheWizard]

We keep it.

No tears, Janke. It's a waste of good suffering.

 

[Goyslop Muncher]

I'm curious if these votes have ever resulted in deleting

 

[Carpshoot Circuis-breaker]

I'm curious if these votes have ever resulted in deleting

I'm curious if anyone ever, by proxy of a lawyer or friend, specifically requested a Rules of Nature hearing from Null

 

[Lame Entropy]

200 of you are brain-dead simps that deserve to lick Bella's toenail. I'll be kind and assume that the other 2 were drunk and chose delete by mistake.

I'm curious if these votes have ever resulted in deleting

They have. I recall one being some cosplayer who was polite when asking and whose thread was dead anyway.

 

[Zaryiu2]

Hell no

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm curious if these votes have ever resulted in deleting

Quite a few, actually. All the ones marked "approved" in this thread.

Usually it seems to happen if the stuff is old, nobody gives a shit, the info was bad, et cetera.

This bitch boiled hamsters, and it's still fresh in everybody's mind. Fuck her.

 

[NulWillBecomeTranny]

She's disgusting filth and a sociopath that tortured animals to death for pleasure, murder is only a matter of time for her. Don't delete.

Also ignore the Streisand effect at your peril.

The Streisand effect isn't real. If KF gets killed by feds over this you can bet there's not going to be academics, the media, police, or other agencies spreading information about it. The extent that the effect exists is only when a site exists to keep track of jewry and censorship and an easy way to share information. People are lazy. When youtube censors something, the vast majority of people don't rush to odysee or bitchute or something to get more information, they just keep using youtube, because they are lazy and ultimately don't care.

 

[Soulless Manniquin Esq.]

It’s a nice sentiment, tho

I can understand what you’re saying, but it’s a fucking terrible approach to the situation. Your mindset is the same sort of thing that would consistently allow terrible people with power to get away with whatever they want, simply based on the premise that they could cause you harm.

Ultimately if this is what destroys the Farms, then it’s a hill I’ll happily die on. If the votes are also to be believed, it’s a sentiment I imagine many share.

It’s a sentiment I share, I just don’t know if I can ask Null to do that for us.

Ultimately he suffers for us.
Either way, I get the feeling he’s mostly ambivalent to the letter and feels no fear from it or it’s sender. So honestly, that makes me feel better about the idea of keeping the board.

If Null felt there was a real danger, then I couldn’t ask him to put his neck in my stead.
I would change my vote to keep, but what’s done is done.

 

[Czechem Republic]

The Streisand effect isn't real

Well that's the dumbest fucking thing anyone without a thread has said today.

 

[Xenomorph]

 

[stares at error messages]

Fuck 'em

Where do I vote?

 

[ChooChooChooseMe]

.

• Fuck 'em
  
  Where do I vote?

  • Total voters 3,903
  • Poll closed Yesterday at 11:28 AM.

 

[The Un-Clit]

What a goddamn shame I missed this early enough to get in on the fun. I'll keep it short and sweet.

No.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

200 of you are brain-dead simps that deserve to lick Bella's toenail.

I would assume at least half of them would enjoy it.

I'll be kind and assume that the other 2 were drunk and chose delete by mistake.

Those two are probably @GiBi and @Psychic Espeon.

 

[Uncle Meat]

OK, we've got it wrong. That is certainly possible. If the explanation is off the record and not public, the entire readership of Kiwifarms will remain misinformed forever. That isn't right. The best way to solve this is for their lawyer to post a public notice explaining the factual errors and errors in context fully. Until they do that, I vote no redaction because I believe in truth winning out. If it isn't worth it to them to explain, it isn't worth it to them to complain.

 

[tiamatfminor]

weird how someone whod do this and someone whod want to be remembered would fall back on this, girlie get a grip. for the rest of christory your name will not be forgotten. you got what you wanted.

 

[Kheapathic]

Bitch posts pictures and boasts about molesting roommates and killing animals. "There's additional facts missing that may change the context of the story."

Yes, of course there is, Mr. Soulless Fucking Mannequin Esq. I'm sure someone openly talking about their conquests in the realms of sexual assault and small animal murder is a delicate issue that requires additional information to understand exactly what your client was trying to say.

Hang the whore, and let's keep the record.

 

[Truthkeeper]

As someone who hasn't been around here that long, can someone explain to me why the vote is called Rules of Nature?

I wonder if the lawyer is actually aware of any of the material on Janke covered here, or if he stopped paying attention once the check cleared.

 

[Nuttelex]

That was an incredibly polite legal letter.
But yeah fuck her, act like a psychopath get treated like a psychopath.
I see her and her 1337 h4x0r friends voted 202 times lol