2022-06-10 - DMCAForce finally responds after years of sending OnlyFans related complaints

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't know much about this, so if you don't mind my asking, how would you go about it if you had the authority?
I can't speak for who you are quoting, but I can think of a few good places to start:

1) Requiring the fair use analysis be included in the takedown notice by the filing party. Currently it is "required" but you don't have to show your work, so it's not "required" at all. This would be an excellent speedbump especially in combination with some procedural changes and liberal "shall issue sanctions" language added to the law for missing or obviously incorrect analysis.

2) Prohibiting foreigners from using the system without an actual lawyer in the USA retained to file the actual takedowns for them. No more of this "DMCA agent in Cyprus for companies in the Canary Islands" shit. Headquarter in the USA or shove money up a lawyers ass at $200 or more an hour to do your dirty work.

3) Some way to drag the complainant into court on the complainants dime for situations exactly like this, though implementing and balancing such a system would be difficult so I won't claim to have the answers on specifics.


On fair use analysis, if my memory of this is correct, the only time someone's gotten dinged was when a company admitted in a lawsuit that they did not do a fair use analysis, and for clarity, that's a once in a lifetime thing because after that everyone will just blanket claim they did and that's good enough.

The reality is most fair use analysis is not complicated: typical piracy websites do not try to be transformative at all, and don't post the content in a way which can be explained away by fair use, so such a requirement as laid out by 1 shouldn't be onerous for a rightsholder who is sufficiently invested in protecting their IP, but it should provide a barrier to entry which makes a rightsholder think "is it actually worth it for me to do this?" as paying a lawyer for even half an hours's work (which seems to be the smallest time fraction I've seen a lawyer bill) per claimed item starts to add up really fast.
 
On fair use analysis, if my memory of this is correct, the only time someone's gotten dinged was when a company admitted in a lawsuit that they did not do a fair use analysis, and for clarity, that's a once in a lifetime thing because after that everyone will just blanket claim they did and that's good enough.
Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. Also the lack of a fair use analysis could be inferred by the filing of a DMCA notification that no reasonable person could possibly have filed after such an analysis.
 
Onlyfans is weird af. Who pays for porn?
Pirates taking one for the team.

Also, to all the e-thots reading this, unless you have a body like Tania Bann and can somehow take quality photos of yourself, you won't make jackshit for money. You hos are quite literally dime-a-dozen.
 
Lawrence? Lawrence what? Of Arabia? That name sounds like royalty is he royalty? Does he suck dicks?
Lawrence Ufa Labia. Seriously, no one made this joke before my late and homosexual ass got here?

Is there an actual subforum where all of Dear Feeder's legal replies are compiled? I'm a lazy fuck, so I haven't searched, but I'd follow it, in a heartbeat.
 
Lawrence Ufa Labia. Seriously, no one made this joke before my late and homosexual ass got here?

Is there an actual subforum where all of Dear Feeder's legal replies are compiled? I'm a lazy fuck, so I haven't searched, but I'd follow it, in a heartbeat.
If you want some really good legal content, go to the Rules of Nature subforum and read the ones tagged fake. Null thought he was talking to real attorneys so he proceeded to destroy them.
 
Gonna make a million with my new OF rehosting I mean "critique" site
www.ratewhores.info

Can I put up reviews of ex-girlfriends?

When your job entails filing frivolous legal threats all day to people over the internet, it may be prudent to have some foresight and not receive mail officially to your headquarters should someone get fed up with your aggressive cunt-ery and decide to send you a dead pig fetus or a literal box of human shit.

Just a reminder to everyone, human shit contains DNA of the individual it came from. If you're going to use human shit, remember to use shit that can't be linked back to you. This goes for dog and cat shit as well, their DNA is in it too, and if you own the animal or have access to it, that's a good way to establish that you were the one that sent it.

I once saw an Onlyfans compilation video where a G-list ethot pulled on a cigarette with her asshole and then blew rings with it.

I dont know where I am going with this but OF is pig disgusting.

I had no idea that was even possible.
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dork Of Ages
Just a reminder to everyone, human shit contains DNA of the individual it came from. If you're going to use human shit, remember to use shit that can't be linked back to you. This goes for dog and cat shit as well, their DNA is in it too, and if you own the animal or have access to it, that's a good way to establish that you were the one that sent it.
Who would ever go to the trouble to go to court, get a subpoena and search warrant to seize a cat or dog to obtain samples of its DNA to then compare against a specimen of animal waste to determine if it's a match, presumably because someone whined about being mailed a turd? How would you even go about establishing who to seek a subpoena against in the first place?

Jimmy "No Fun" McGee shouting "I just know my evil neighbor Bob Chadman mailed this cat turd to me!" doesn't sound like it'd be enough to actually convince a court to force Bob to give up some juicy feline DNA to some random cop who shows up at his house.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back