Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Retard pozloaded the misery goblins neghole and now he reaps the consequences.
 
I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Does this set any kind of precedent though? This is what I'd ask Hardin. If a mutual arbitration isn't and can't be precedent, that would weigh in how much this matters yes?

Also are money orders still viable?
 
I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
It does? There's already a warning during sign-up. If you add whatever Jarrod did (I think upload a copyrighted video, or maybe use an easily-doxed email address) to those guidelines and use Jarrod as an example of why you shouldn't do it, the problem is solved. Then it's not a hard rule so much as "if you do this you're an idiot and will get caught", like using your common username as your Kiwifarms name. I understand not wanting some idiot you hate to have an unearned victory, but this isn't your fight to lose.
 
Null you probably should have made it clear that acerthorne is the person that sued Jared. I say support Jared but with a small amount of the fund
 
If spending my money means this fat, litigious, elder-abusing faggot is finally declared a vexatious litigant, I say go for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .iota.
I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
My unsolicited (and probably inherently despised) take: many see Acerthorne as the beginning of another Greer.

I maintain that another round of funding is probably the safest first baby step.

Edit: Maybe it is technically solicited (see OP), but what I mean is that many don't want to kickstart Greer 2.0 while also subsidizing Zell's decisions. Rich coming from me, I know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BULLY HUNTER_78
He'd still sue. See the current lawsuit.
Honestly, I have a "Fuck it, we ball" mentality. If I had that amount of fuck you money, I'd Intervene. Granted, it's possible another lawsuit could come out of the blue so be prepared to do another legal fund drive if you do go for it.
 
Jarrod is obligated to send DMCA takedown notices on Stebbins's behalf.
am i reading this wrong? the settlement states that jones is a limited agent for the sole pupose of submitting a dmca notice for the video at issue. that's it; just the one video that he (jones) voluntarily posted himself. i see no indication that jones is in any way legally obligated, or even permitted, to submit anything else on stebbins' behalf unless the same video is re-posted elsewhere.
1721959956462.png

There is literally no one more undeserving of your generosity than Jones. He reuploaded Acerthorn's video on Kiwi Farms just to troll and it backfired.
it would also appear that this is the only video that jones is legally permitted to dmca for stebbins.

Hold up, the DMCA slave is the author of the post? He was forced to file take down notice of his own post? :story:
yes. unfortunately, jones couldn't be bothered to provide any commentary to create a transformative work, but apparently, this is the only video that the court has permitted him to dmca on stebbins' behalf. imho, null could simply allow him to edit his post to include a critique and be done with it.

I suggest we ride the current wave of PR such as being mentioned by high profile YouTubers. Like muta. I feel Null could also get a little more grace with the public by riding on the anti boogie train and making an appearance on the fat retard podcast.
no. fuck those fat retards, fuck youtube, and fuck trying to appeal to "content creators" whose "careers" directly benefit from information found on the farms, while they fail to benefit the farms at all.

If he uses Jarrod to send DMCAs for other things then the site is more impacted and it is even more outrageous/fightable in my retarded opinion.
that's not retarded, but i don't think it something that the court has actually permitted stebbins to do.
 
He'd still sue. See the current lawsuit.
Then he takes the first shot and we fight for the forum and its right to publish legal content without indirectly helping a cowtripper - there is no moral ambiguity in this case. My biggest problem with getting involved now is that it says "We have rules but if you break them we'll still fight for you, maybe".
 
If we let a white man (in name only) become a slave George Floyd wins, plus even if he is a retard (he is lol) he shouldn't be punished for first amendment protected speech.
 
Probs not a good idea homes. I mean we gave you the money and I have said do you want you want with it. I will keep to that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back