- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does this set any kind of precedent though? This is what I'd ask Hardin. If a mutual arbitration isn't and can't be precedent, that would weigh in how much this matters yes?I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Replacing that clip with one that provides commentary and therefore is transformative would be a cheaper compromise.I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Yes. Yes.Does this set any kind of precedent though? This is what I'd ask Hardin. If a mutual arbitration isn't and can't be precedent, that would weigh in how much this matters yes?
Also are money orders still viable?
He'd still sue. See the current lawsuit.Replacing that clip with one that provides commentary and therefore is transformative would be a cheaper compromise.
It does? There's already a warning during sign-up. If you add whatever Jarrod did (I think upload a copyrighted video, or maybe use an easily-doxed email address) to those guidelines and use Jarrod as an example of why you shouldn't do it, the problem is solved. Then it's not a hard rule so much as "if you do this you're an idiot and will get caught", like using your common username as your Kiwifarms name. I understand not wanting some idiot you hate to have an unearned victory, but this isn't your fight to lose.I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Random retards from around the world gets what they want every second of the day. No one cares. This happened on KF but doesn’t involve KF. It’s illogical, as if saying two retards slapping eachother at the walmart directly impacts walmart.A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Do you not already have to deal with someon else who is trying to sue you forever? /sincere/
- Declawing Stebbins is a direct benefit to us because the misery golem recently decided he's just going to sue us forever.
My unsolicited (and probably inherently despised) take: many see Acerthorne as the beginning of another Greer.I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Honestly, I have a "Fuck it, we ball" mentality. If I had that amount of fuck you money, I'd Intervene. Granted, it's possible another lawsuit could come out of the blue so be prepared to do another legal fund drive if you do go for it.He'd still sue. See the current lawsuit.
am i reading this wrong? the settlement states that jones is a limited agent for the sole pupose of submitting a dmca notice for the video at issue. that's it; just the one video that he (jones) voluntarily posted himself. i see no indication that jones is in any way legally obligated, or even permitted, to submit anything else on stebbins' behalf unless the same video is re-posted elsewhere.Jarrod is obligated to send DMCA takedown notices on Stebbins's behalf.
it would also appear that this is the only video that jones is legally permitted to dmca for stebbins.There is literally no one more undeserving of your generosity than Jones. He reuploaded Acerthorn's video on Kiwi Farms just to troll and it backfired.
yes. unfortunately, jones couldn't be bothered to provide any commentary to create a transformative work, but apparently, this is the only video that the court has permitted him to dmca on stebbins' behalf. imho, null could simply allow him to edit his post to include a critique and be done with it.Hold up, the DMCA slave is the author of the post? He was forced to file take down notice of his own post?![]()
no. fuck those fat retards, fuck youtube, and fuck trying to appeal to "content creators" whose "careers" directly benefit from information found on the farms, while they fail to benefit the farms at all.I suggest we ride the current wave of PR such as being mentioned by high profile YouTubers. Like muta. I feel Null could also get a little more grace with the public by riding on the anti boogie train and making an appearance on the fat retard podcast.
that's not retarded, but i don't think it something that the court has actually permitted stebbins to do.If he uses Jarrod to send DMCAs for other things then the site is more impacted and it is even more outrageous/fightable in my retarded opinion.
Then he takes the first shot and we fight for the forum and its right to publish legal content without indirectly helping a cowtripper - there is no moral ambiguity in this case. My biggest problem with getting involved now is that it says "We have rules but if you break them we'll still fight for you, maybe".He'd still sue. See the current lawsuit.