Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I vote no, not because I'd shy away from any fight, but because the courts have already proven they can do whatever they want. If THIS would set up a legitimate and useful precedent, then right on. But since in Utah, at this point, not knowing the law is "excusable negligence" that prevents you from filing litigation, then I doubt sinking money into this would prove useful in the other suits, or in general.

The problem is the per se system and the biased judges, not a precedent. It seems Judges wipe their asses on precedents to get their way. I'd focus the money on destroying the per se system.
 
edit: in case it matters, I contributed $400 to the legal fund so I've got some skin in the game.
I agree as another person who donated quite a bit. It's hard for me to care as there's bigger targets to go after and David is happy to drain the funds dry with his stupidity.
 
I consider that taking the offensive can set up one's self as a target not to be fucked with lightly, with the added benefit of possibly garnering a small handful of brownie points for helping some worthless idiot out of the misery of his own mistakes, while also sticking a thumb into the eye of acerthorn, a fat worthless faggot retard who's total value in life is net negative. I vote 'TO WAR!'
 
We're already involved in 3 other lawsuits.
This would be the only thing I'd personally be worried about. If its in the budget, and there's a decent enough argument, sometimes bold things must be done to fight the good fight. You let one nigger take an inch, every other nigger takes a mile. I think it sort of makes a statement, "stop fucking with my website". I say LET 'ER RIP, JOSH
 
It's got to be done.
The means these lawcow bullies use to fuck people over is deeply unpleasant.

It might even be a useful political posture. The reputation of this place, though totally unfounded, through deliberate misinterpretation used by criminals and predators, has been swallowed and reproduced by the ever falling standard of journalism.

Doing this would be a statement of intent to do what is right and clean up an ever more exploited facet of the legal system-the fact that it is not an especially sympathetic beneficiary is almost more significant, of the belief that everyone deserves a fair representation and not to be dogged by creeps and their own ineptitude.
Teach proper liberalism to the shit libs.
Show the way, O benevolent sneeder
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back