Approved 2024-07-25 - Stebbins: DMCA via Gimp Slave

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

Do we intervene?

  • WARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!

    Votes: 819 37.3%
  • nah

    Votes: 1,377 62.7%

  • Total voters
    2,196
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
As a learned poet I greatly respect would say ,
Fuck these niggas
Fuck these lil gay ass niggas

Don't waste any money volunteering to get into another dragged out and costly legal case with another more retarded Greer.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Justtocheck
Is it possible to get Jarrod Jones defanged by declaring him a vexatious litigant? That would make him functionally useless as a proxy to Stebbins.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spider_expert
I'm really sorry you feel this way but the direct consequence is censoring the site. That's what no means here. A retard gets he wants at the expense of the free flow of information.
Oh wait, you mean you’re actually going to abide with the incoming spurious take-down requests? Even if the post is Fair Use?

Because if that’s the case, I change my vote to waaaaaar. God, I love voting.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mankirk
So are you asking if we should help Jarrod at all or just go after Stebbins? No to helping Jarrod. I don't care if he's acting on behalf of stebbins, he should suffer too. He's only ordered to pay his settlement not file DMCA requests as a proxy retard. If you are going to do anything punish them both. Jarrod isn't going to like you if you stick your neck out for him at all and you stand to gain nothing from helping Jarrod fight stebbins settlement.
 
all else aside, I'm a little surprised that a featured poll doesn't have the vast majority voting "yes start shit for more content"
 
  • Agree
Reactions: .iota.
"DURRRRR should I get involved in faggot internet drama for teh heckin lulz???"-- Joshua Connor Moon
 

Attachments

  • emogee 152.png
    emogee 152.png
    340.1 KB · Views: 9
So are you asking if we should help Jarrod at all or just go after Stebbins? No to helping Jarrod. I don't care if he's acting on behalf of stebbins, he should suffer too. He's only ordered to pay his settlement not file DMCA requests as a proxy retard. If you are going to do anything punish them both. Jarrod isn't going to like you if you stick your neck out for him at all and you stand to gain nothing from helping Jarrod fight stebbins settlement.

Quite the opposite.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: zyclonPD
It would be incredibly funny and well-deserved karma but it would also be a bit of a waste of money. Wouldn't the case be thrown out as soon as Stebbins says he isn't suing his own client?
 
The real thing to worry about is the Jenga tower of lawsuits that's starting to form. I'd say if you are willing to take this one on, you might want to raise a sidepot to fund it. I'd be more than willing to slap a couple greenbacks down for kicking a retard down a metaphorical legal staircase.

It'd be funnier to just raise a separate fund to pay off Jones' judgment and deprive Acerthorn of his slave.
If all it takes is $1800 to free a Kiwi (even an especially stupid one) from Acerthorn, count me in for a hundred. Assuming KF could pay the debt without incurring new issues, I think the sidepot idea is best.
I suspect that otherwise, Stebbins knowing Jones has a KF account will lead to more BS DMCA filings, that he will force Jones to do in compliance with the settlement.

IANAL, but if 1800 is all it takes to strip Stebbins of his new favorite puppet, I'd consider that money well spent.

I do not support spending the KF Defense Fund on this.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: crab fucker
Oh wait, you mean you’re actually going to abide with the incoming spurious take-down requests? Even if the post is Fair Use?
I went through the trouble of checking the post:
I'd say it's not a clear case of fair use, commentary portion of the post is rather minimal. If he files a valid complain (and he'll figure it out at some point, just like Melinda Scott - another retard - figured out default judgement) it'll have to be taken down because the forum is US legal.
 
As someone that donated about $2,500 via money order I would advise we keep the money for direct threats to the farms and not get involved here.
Even if we benefit I think there are enough open cases for now
 
If all it takes is $1800 to free a Kiwi (even an especially stupid one) from Acerthorn, count me in for a hundred. Assuming KF could pay the debt without incurring new issues, I think the sidepot idea is best.
I suspect that otherwise, Stebbins knowing Jones has a KF account will lead to more BS DMCA filings, that he will force Jones to do in compliance with the settlement.

IANAL, but if 1800 is all it takes to strip Stebbins of his new favorite puppet, I'd consider that money well spent.

I do not support spending the KF Defense Fund on this.
Also consider that Acerthorn is retarded white trash. Handing him $18000 is likely to be more of a curse than it is a boon. You'd be amazed by what kind of trouble such a person can get themselves into when they have a little bit of scratch to throw around.

EDIT: Actually you don't have to imagine it, just read the farms.
 
Entering litigation voluntarily is generally considered "fucking retarded" in legal circles.
At least in the Greer case, betting on the rational, normal, non-retarded option has generally not been conducive to your success.
I vote Total Turkey War.
 
Entering litigation voluntarily is generally considered "fucking retarded" in legal circles.
You're going to be dragged into litigation involuntarily if you don't fight this fight. Damned if you do, but far more damned if you don't, so I say fucking go for the throat.
 
I'm really mixed on this. Normally I would say avoid direct contact with the cows. Let Acer and Zel to their fates. But the fact that he is using some questionable settlement terms (did the court accept this?) to compel Zel to legally harass Josh and the Farms weighs in on going after him. This is a play by Acerthorne to get around his Vexatious status, and to harass a party that he is already under litigation with. Yes that seems quite actionable. I would go with Hardin's recomendations on this. At a minuet seek an injunction against Acerthorne against the harassment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back