2025-07-25 - OFCOM: "Ofcom engagement - Availability of KiwiFarms in UK"

[WelperHelper99]

Maybe I'll be proven wrong, but I get the feeling this whole flap over OFCOM has brought together US-based people and entities that would otherwise want nothing to do with each other because they nevertheless share the common interest of not giving into this overreach of authority. As the cliche goes, Politics makes strange bedfellows.

Still, I'm sure whatever Dear Leader announces next regarding this will be both epic and worth the wait

If it is to be a lawsuit, the Farms being at the head makes the most sense practically. We deal with retards on the daily. We are also expendable in the eyes of the big corpos. Sending us a lawyer or two to fight their battles means the big corpos don't get their hands dirty. And if we win, all is well. If we lose, well, it is what it is

 

[Dr Cruel]

I don't understand. My impression was that we had a war to prevent this sort of British fuckery over here. We even put it in the US Constitution so we wouldn't forget about it.

Send them a letter. Claim that, after sober reflection with the Kiwi Farms membership and select representatives of the British people, we have determined that the United Kingdom’s Online Safety regulators are fascist cunts. Remind them that they were beaten in the Revolutionary War and tell them to piss off.

"from exposure to illegal content and material that may be harmful to children"

The United Kingdom’s Online Safety regulators are harmful to children. We order them to cease and desist in their online fascist pedophilia or suffer the consequences.


The Great Oz has spoken.

 

[A_right_horrorshow]

What's the most annoying is this is such a thinly veiled attempt to preemptively shut down any place that allows open criticism of the government and it's decision to import millions of pajeets and Pakistani rape gangs for the past 20 years. They're dressing it up as "Protecting children" but they were quite happy to allow the wholesale trafficking and rape of children for decades. They've never respected the working class but at least they feared them after the poll tax riots enough to try and make their lies and schemes less transparent.

 

[UnFuNnYmEmE]

Autists generally just say what they believe to be true, which causes endless problems because most people have learned that the truth isn't meant to be said

Even their adult film actresses suck. Belgium has better talent. RIP Julie Skyhigh

 

[>IMPLYING]

I am awaiting with baited breath our dear Ooperator's response to the ofcom's request.

It'll likely be a reply to their reply, which he probably won't receive until 25+ employees of Ofcom come up with a sufficiently passive aggressive, semi-threatening email to send him in which they'll be extending the deadline by another week.

 

[Made In Wales]

Imagining an OFCOM v Kiwi Farms chase with this classic playing:

Benny Hill Theme

www.youtube.com

 

[Daddy's Little Kitten]

I dedicate this song to all the Br*tish kiwis we have lost:

 

[SilkyJohnston]

Soon you're going to need a loicense to even soypost in the uk, bruv...
OI!

 

[Racial Slurs the Movie]

If it is to be a lawsuit, the Farms being at the head makes the most sense practically.

This is a retarded take.

The forum described as a hate site with revenge porn and going out of it's way to dox people shouldn't be the head of anything you want to succeed. I know those things aren't entirely true but nigga have you see how the rest of the world see's us?

 

[WelperHelper99]

This is a retarded take.

The forum described as a hate site with revenge porn and going out of it's way to dox people shouldn't be the head of anything you want to succeed. I know those things aren't entirely true but nigga have you see how the rest of the world see's us?

What part of expendable don't you understand? We win, everyone wins. We lose, we're fucked anyway. We don't really have a brand risk since we're already tainted

 

[Super Spook Jr]

What happens if he doesn't comply? Sorry if this has been answered already

 

[Automaton Type 2B]

Imagine telling people in prison that you're in here for posting on the Farms.

Wild times...

 

[SCV]

Don't block the UK and make the banner saying "we're not blocking you but your government is full of faggots" link to a live thread covering the latest government sponsored paki rapes.

Liking this suggestion. Not blocking it and a page showing the britoids just how bad it is would make ofcom right and proper upset.

 

[Racial Slurs the Movie]

What part of expendable don't you understand? We win, everyone wins. We lose, we're fucked anyway. We don't really have a brand risk since we're already tainted

Why wouldn't you want to have the best possible chance to win instead of just throwing away any chance.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Why wouldn't you want to have the best possible chance to win instead of just throwing away any chance.

Because Microsoft, Meta, Google, X, can all comply with the new rules. It cost a fuck ton if money though. They would rather not but could live with it if so. This is the compromise. It's a proxy war. Let the little guy fight with your juiced up lawyer. If he fails, you still have good relationships with the UK. If he wins, you all win.

 

[AnOminous]

There are lots of based pajeets here, Mohan Singh of the Sikh Awareness Society and Raja Miah have done a ton of work to expose and fight the rape gangs.

Even a jeet Sikh is a Sikh first. They don't really deserve to be lumped in with street shitters.

 

[The Ugly One]

Whats really sad about Trident is that it's a variation of the US Thor missile.
A very old dilapidated missile platform. It doesn't have the ability to carry the countermeasures and shielding most modern ICBM's have. Even compared to France or China. Most of their technology has completely stagnated compared to most western nations. Even their once lauded biotech sector has been left in the dust.

but there are such yummy yummy halal food carts in london now

 

[>IMPLYING]

What happens if he doesn't comply? Sorry if this has been answered already

They send an "enforcement" warning for him to comply, giving him another deadline.
When he doesn't meet that deadline, they'll open an "investigation" into the website as he hasn't complied.
After several months, they'll reach a judgement and pursue action (or not, drawing their feet forever - see 4chan). At first it'd be a "fine" (one they'd have to pursue privately since they don't actually have state-backing - good fucking luck) then another demand to comply with the threat of the fine emphasising the need to comply, accompanied by a deadline.

1. TV licence route: Null doesn't comply, then they go back to step one, apologising for the tone and requesting compliance by another deadline. Null doesn't meet it, they threaten to enforce the fine by another extended deadline, repeat ad infinitum.
2. Impotency route: Null doesn't comply, the threat of fine is out there, but they somehow have to enforce that fine via private channels. They may then approach the government with their findings, at which point a private court must determine whether their findings prove the site is in violation of the Online Safety Act and consequently ban the site or - funniest outcome - not. (If Null gets fewer than 7 million active users from the UK a month the site was meant to be ignored anyway)

 

[HTTP Error 404]

They send an "enforcement" warning for him to comply, giving him another deadline.
When he doesn't meet that deadline, they'll open an "investigation" into the website as he hasn't complied.
After several months, they'll reach a judgement and pursue action (or not, drawing their feet forever - see 4chan). At first it'd be a "fine" (one they'd have to pursue privately since they don't actually have state-backing - good fucking luck) then another demand to comply with the threat of the fine emphasising the need to comply, accompanied by a deadline.

1. TV licence route: Null doesn't comply, then they go back to step one, apologising for the tone and requesting compliance by another deadline. Null doesn't meet it, they threaten to enforce the fine by another extended deadline, repeat ad infinitum.
2. Impotency route: Null doesn't comply, the threat of fine is out there, but they somehow have to enforce that fine via private channels. They may then approach the government with their findings, at which point a private court must determine whether their findings prove the site is in violation of the Online Safety Act and consequently ban the site or - funniest outcome - not. (If Null gets fewer than 7 million active users from the UK a month the site was meant to be ignored anyway)

3. They declare him guilty of British Wrongthink with a huge fine and a traffic court judge in Hawaii declares Null has to pay the fine because it's the heckin' right wholesome thing to do for naughty wronthinker chuddies who are being fined for doing things the leftist judges don't want you doing anyway, even if it's legal here (but shouldn't be, see: things lefty judges don't want you doing) but not legal elsewhere.

It sounds stupid but I could absolutely see some retard judge go "yeah it's TECHNICALLY legal but you TECHNICALLY broke British law and since they're, you know, allies..."

 

[>IMPLYING]

3. They declare him guilty of British Wrongthink with a huge fine and a traffic court judge in Hawaii declares Null has to pay the fine because it's the heckin' right wholesome thing to do for naughty wronthinker chuddies who are being fined for doing things the leftist judges don't want you doing anyway, even if it's legal here (but shouldn't be, see: things lefty judges don't want you doing) but not legal elsewhere.

It sounds stupid but I could absolutely see some retard judge go "yeah it's TECHNICALLY legal but you TECHNICALLY broke British law and since they're, you know, allies..."

They could but it also feels like the easiest thing in the world to counter-argue considering Null doesn't reside in the UK and the UK cannot claim jurisdiction over the entire internet. I'm not sure Null's location is public, so Ofcom would have to hire solicitors with the foreknowledge of who to contact with regards of enforcing this fine. It's honestly simpler to just ban the website than go through the hassle of trying to claim 10% of the site's income (which I have no idea of the amount that is but I feel like Null could claim all his income is independent of the site itself since he lives off of donations meaning they get nothing lmao)

Another important thing to remember is that Ofcom are an independent body in name, they're not representative of the UK government despite enforcing its laws, so unless they get the UK government to pursue litigation on their behalf, it's the equivalent of an UK company trying to sue a US citizen for acting according to US law.

Just like with the TV licence in the UK (R.I.P in 2027), they rely on fear to get individuals to self-police and comply, because they don't have the manpower, authority, or capital to enforce shit absolutely.

Null is 100% safe.